1122
Comments (46)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
americandrunk 3 points ago +5 / -2

This could make everything worse because that would just incentivize them to work harder for the bribes.

Instead, a better option might be:

  1. Make all government work EXTREMELY WELL PAID, on the border of being / getting rich.

  2. In exchange, reduce the size of government and size of the bureaucracies by ... what 50%? More? And introduce risk mitigation into the equation so it is easy for all bureaucrats to lose their jobs.

The idea is to reduce the amount of variables in the system so it is easier to control and flip the incentive structure such that the bureaucrats value their jobs so much they would be willing to make the system exchange and live under risk.

An even better approach might be to make their pay so high they are effectively rich and tie their jobs to how well they follow the constitution in exchange for living under a higher risk of losing their jobs.

11
bobobob 11 points ago +11 / -0

Shrink the federal government back down to its constitutionally defined role of providing for common defense and resolving interstate disputes. Everything else should be handled at the state or local levels.

4
alucard13mmfmj 4 points ago +4 / -0

Its similar to how trump has a lot of money already so no amount of money bribes can influence him. He had sexy time with plenty of super models, porn stars and have a hot wife so cant bribe with women.

Only way they can get him is with blackmail and threats to his love ones.

3
Awakened 3 points ago +3 / -0

That kind of person would be happy to take they money you are giving them AND take even more through kick backs and bribes.

1
Stanford 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tell Ancaps.win your idea so they can explain why it won't work.