I disagree with one thing you said. We DO know that Ashli Babbit was murdered without any justification. In fact, in this situation the State owes us a very detailed and precise justification and until there is one provided we can rationally assume that it was NOT justified given all we do know plus the video. Maybe this sounds like I'm assuming guilt without due process. But I'm accusing the State. Think about it, does the State get due process? What happens when the State simply declares it is justified and declines due process (like a stolen election)? ... What I'm getting at is - there is NO presumption of innocence given to the State. - So the appropriate action of the State is to charge the officer of murder and then give that officer due process. They don't want to do this because that will expose the murderer in the shooter's ear.
If this was justified then they would be able to show the documented rules of use of lethal force, then show how the victim's actions justified pulling the trigger.
Edit: I posted before asking for a debate with the "Ashli is Fake" crowd. If that's you and you want to debate please use that post. The point of this post is a little advanced for you.
But, but , but..they said she died and held a memorial 30 days later and then a funeral 45 days later....but but but I saw some blood come out her nose....
Run along.... you're only convincing yourself. That's how parroting a lie works.
Sure and you keep posting that lie over and over is how you convince yourself its true.lol
OK since you have a masochistic crush on me:
Most people understand a basic axiom of deduction; that the truth of a matter tends to have the explanation that requires the least illogical assumptions. Occam's Razor.
This does not mean that there can never be a false-flag shooting death. But it does mean that your assertion requires that you have sufficient direct and/or circumstantial evidence to explain your hypothesis - enough to cause it to become the simplest explanation for all of your evidence.
So, you relying on a video and ridiculous claims that NOT seeing a death cert or NOT seeing a funeral or NOT seeing enough blood - should overwhelm what is plain to see.
Furthermore if your conspiracy theory is any good - you should be able to explain the motive behind your theory. And that's where your religion really breaks down. Tell us what purpose it serves the State to have faked a murder that they are clearly guilty of?