The House would get nothing done without rules, including a hybrid of Roberts Rules of Order. Congress getting nothing done might be a good thing, but there has to be structure, otherwise there's chaos.
The rules of moral human conduct are emergent. Nobody has to tell you that murder, rape or theft is wrong, and everyone has a moral right to prevent such behavior.
The rules of the House are the rules of the House.
One of their rules is that House members can't insult a sitting president at a personal level. That's a pretty good rule, IMO.
The last place we need anarchy is in Congress. It's bad enough as it is.
I would say it is the first place.
Anarchy is not a lack of rules, it is a lack of rulers.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/anarchy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archon
The House would get nothing done without rules, including a hybrid of Roberts Rules of Order. Congress getting nothing done might be a good thing, but there has to be structure, otherwise there's chaos.
An = Without
Archon = Ruler
Anarchy = Without Rulers.
The rules of moral human conduct are emergent. Nobody has to tell you that murder, rape or theft is wrong, and everyone has a moral right to prevent such behavior.
You should start a thread about that.
Down-voted for stating reality?
Zero fucks given.