This is YUGE - "The Washington Post's Fake Trump Quote Scandal Is a Lot Worse Than You Think"
(media.patriots.win)
β Far-Left Media β
Comments (291)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
β’
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
The damage is done. 100% of the npcβs will still believe the original article.
Exactly. A retraction is not a front page headline.
The lie survives and the truth is but a side-note.
Very poetic! This is why I never rejoice those "retractions". I only rejoice when he liars are fired, or better, punished for libel.
Washington Post is a fake news outlet and I'm not really sure why they havent been deplatformed . independent fact checkers have found that they lied over 20,000 times just over the four years of Trump's presidency..
at the very least any Republican who deserves to be in office should be hounding Facebook to remove Washington Post as one of its fact checker
wapo falsely makes up 20000 phony fact checks to claim trump π ππΎ "20π ππππΎπ"
πΆπΊππππππππ π―πππ ππΊππΎπ ππ πππππ πΊππ½ πππΎπ ππΎπππΊπΌππ ππ: βπ¬πππ π±ππππΎπ ππ πππππ πΊ πͺπͺπͺ ππ πππΊπ ππ πππ πππΎπΎπΌππΎπβ
π½πΎπ»ππππππ ππΊππ (πΊππΊππ)
πΆπΊππππππππ π―πππ π±πΎπππππΎπ π«π¨π€π² π π»πππ π³ππππ
πΆπΊππππππππ π―ππ π π π π₯ππ π πππΎππ π―πΊππΎππ ππππ π«ππΎπ πΊπ»πππ π¦π¦ π²ππΊππΎπ π±πΎπΏπππππ ππ π¦πππΎ π΅πππΎπ π£πΊππΊ ππ π―ππΎπππ½πΎππ π³ππππβπ π€π πΎπΌππππ π¨πππΎπππππ π’πππππππππ
πΆπΊππππππππ π―πππ π±πΎπππππΎπ π«ππΎπ π π»πππ π’π πππππ π’ππππ½ π²πππΎ
wapo π ππΎ π«ππππ πΆππΎπ π³ππΎπ π’π πΊππ πππΎ π³ππΊπππΌππππ βπ¨ππβπ πΊ π³ππΊπππΌππππ.β
wapoo π ππΎπ πΊπ»πππ π³ππππ π»πΎπππ πΏπππΎπ½ $π€π’π’π’π’π’π’ ππ πππ πΏππππ½πΊππππ
wapoo π²πππΎπππ π₯πππ½π π―πππ»π πΎπ πΆπππ π£πΎπΊππ ππΏ π¨π²π¨π² π«πΎπΊπ½πΎπ
The Washington PostΒ spreadtheΒ now-debunked lieΒ that Tea Party protesters hurled racist and slurs at Democrat lawmakers.
The Washington PostΒ was caught red-handed lyingΒ about a conservative crowdβs reaction to a Mu slim activist.
wapoo lies that project veritas doctored anything.
Trumps tax cut caused a deficit?
π’ππππππππ πππ½π πΊπππΊπΌππΎπ½ πΊπ πππ½ππΊπ?
π³ππππ πΌπΊπ π πΎπ½ ππΎπππΌπΊππ ππΊ πππππ?
π³πππππΌπΊππΎ ππππ π½ππ πΌπππΎπ πππΎ πΎπππππππ πΌπππ½ππππππ?
π½ππ½ πππππ "πππ ππΎππ ππ π»π πΊπΌπ ππΎπππ πΎ"?.
π³ππππ πππΊπππΎπ½ ππππ?
wapo lies that Russia hacked the power gr..
Source: http://msmlies.com
Excellent job using those Unicode characters (that look just like normal fonts) to foil the Goolag censors!
Wow...Now THAT is WMDs level propaganda!
Lucifer's Bellbirds will not be denied an audience for their choruses of demented blab.
Nice thanks for the source of these msm lies!
Fantastic list of fake news! Keep them coming.
NICE LIST. FAKE NEWS IS THE ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE. WHILE I AGREE THAT THERE WILL BE MANY WHO NEVER HEAR THE RETRACTION SPECIFIC TO THE TREACHERY OF THE GA SOS, BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, THERE IS THE OTHER SHOE THAT IS BOUND TO DROP WHICH IS THE FRAUD IN THE GA ELECTION. I EXPECT THAT FURTHER FORENSIC INVESTIGATION WILL RESULT IN THE OVERTURNING OF THE ELECTION IN THE FAVOR OF PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A DIFFERENCE OF LESS THAN 12K VOTES TO ACCOMPLISH THIS.
Like all the BLM stories of innocent church going black "martyrs" executed in cold blood by racist white supremacist cops. As are all Democrats, the fake news media is the absolute enemy of America and Americans
This is how propaganda works.
I see your point but, who sits in the white house? A lot of people still get their news from the big 3 and believe everything they are told. My brother who is a good guy and very smart says, why would they lie?
The media has never fought a war of truth. Ever.
I mean....I definitely get the feeling that no one really believes all this bullshit anymore, which is the 180-degree opposite of my sense of how 2008 went.
The thing now is I'm not sure it matters. People are no longer impressed with 20-minute ads with strings of celebrities literally pledging allegiance to Barack Obama. But I think they're afraid of losing their jobs if they let on that they no longer think in perfect accordance with the brainwashing. They're afraid of being thrown out of school. They're afraid of the social consequences of saying out loud what most of the people they know are already thinking anyway.
Barry legalized propaganda, so....
this is very true....many people don't know this
Truth is the first casualty of war.
Yes. And they know this all to well.
The lie has already circled the globe twice before the truth could even put its shoes on.
This is the only thing that might matter. If these assholes lose another multiple hundred million dollar case it might break them.
I doubt it. These companies are owned by billionaires.
Trilateralists and Bilderbergers
Trump could sue them so hard, he'd own the companies at the end. That's why. Their lawyers told them to retract the story, period.
Now, in a just world, Nancy would be facing expulsion over this. But we don't live in a just world anymore.
Trump was impeached for inciting insurrection only the second time. This call had nothing to do with it.
There were dem calls for impeachment over this call, but they figured they had a better chance with the insurrection BS. Maybe they would have used this alone if they didn't have an actual peaceful protest to pearl-clutch over.
History matters, let's get it right.
NPC11011110000 - "shoes"
HanLoco - "sole"
I see what you did there.
The truth came out. Someone found a deleted copy of the phone call on a laptop during a records request. Something like that... anyway a copy of the call came out so everyone had to retract their bullshit.
I work in a newsroom. They didn't confirm shit. Every day, they write "confirms" or "sources say" or whatever in their stories, without making any actual calls... because they know they will never be held accountable. The execs love it.
And on the off chance their fraud is found out, it won't matter because they almost never do corrections. As you said, the point of the article is to do damage. Nothing more.
They write like bitchy, petulant, catty little girls because they still think Orange Man Bad.
And all this time I thought it was because they were bitchy, petulant, catty little girls with a feminazi axe to grind.
you ever heard of the minnesota gag rule?
since earlier than 1931 from what i read years ago.
spez: just to add, am surprised journalism schools do not include this in their curriculum,
Okay. I just read your comment. Thanks.
Media has the same 1st Amendment right as we do. However, you're still subject to libel/defamation lawsuits and they need to start fucking happening.
Seat belt gag rule? What is the reason for that?
what is a seat belt gag rule? explain as you are just confusing the topic for some inane reason.
My bad. I searched for βMinnesota Gag Ruleβ and the first 5 articles were about a seat belt gag rule. I was as completely baffled as you were. I kept searching and guess you are referring to the gag rule regarding contraception? But, on the other hand, you could be referring to something completely else. Have a great day, fren. https://powertodecide.org/about-usnewsroom/domestic-gag-rule-reduces-contraceptive-access-for-nearly-200000-women-living
negative, it was a supreme court ruling on the press from the minnesota area i believe events happened in 1920's
spez: https://law.jrank.org/pages/23246/Near-v-Minnesota-Significance.html
Good article. Passed in 1925 to counteract βyellow journalismβ. Thx!
You work in a newsroom?! Call Project Veritas and put on a hidden camera to expose the fraud you must see on a daily basis!!
I believe it! That must be frustrating for you, pede.
Seems the current level of journalistic ethics means if you think something is sketchy, you quote the other news source.........and run with it anyway.
Talking head on NBC βNYT sources say that Donald Trump kicked his cat,β having never checked if he had a cat.
It is done, but it is a great example of the depth of the BS. Any time absolute proof presents itself causing a media narrative to collapse on itself, it can be useful for redpills. Having multiple MSM outlets confirm the story makes it about as reliable as the news ever gets and it still turned out to be completely manufactured.
That's because they'll issue a retraction on the last page.
Absolute PROOF that the MSM simply makes shit up.
They got caught. Any repercussions? Of course not.
Any fact checks? Nope.
Anyone fired for lying about "sources" who "confirmed" the bull-shit? Not a chance in hell.
This is exactly why there must be a sea change in how the law regards companies who present themselves as professional news sources or how defamatory accusations are legally handled. Of course I realize in the current environment this is not going to happen but I'm thinking of a time when our form of government is being restructured...
And we aren't even sure if we are fully in the era of deep fake videos yet. There is no doubt that they exist and are being used, but where, when and by whom. The damage potential is astronomical and it doesn't need to be on big things, they could be on small things planting subtle ideas. Just make someone look a little uglier, it doesn't take much. And I'll tell you something, they were doing precisely that decades ago.
The media say "we're journalists" the same way Twitter and Facebook say "we're a platform". They're fucking lying Democrat operatives trying to wreck America. They'll get what's coming to them.
Libel and slander laws should be enforced more often.
We need to win more cases like the Covington kid. Journalists hide behind their protections, but they cannot be above the law if they abuse their powers.
All of the liars need to be stomped into the dirt by a herd of Alpacas.
Retracto the Alpaca? Is that you?
Going to have to happen at state level. Swamp certainly isn't going to do anything about their propaganda wing.
Just strengthening defamation laws will go a long way. Someone being a public figure or politician should be irrelevant. Calling someone an "ist" or a "phobe" should explicitly be defamatory. Making negative claims about group or class and then linking someone to that group in order to create a negative association should explicitly be defamatory.
Iirc, didn't the whole 'orange man bad' originate because some networks were filtering President Trump to look more orange? If so, that's right along the lines of subtle changes you mentioned. I'm sure there's a lot more of the subtle stuff that is hard to discern.
Yep, the laws protecting the press' lies are insane. Stories based on anonymous sources are sloppy and presenting them as actual news rather than pure rumormongering is just misleading the public. However, they do it on purpose and no one stops them because they're all in bed together.
Speaking of anonymous sources, this is where I get into trouble with the Q people. If I'm not going to listen to MSM bullshit via their anonymous sources, why would I listen to something that is doing the same with pleasing things I might want to hear?
I precisely ignored the whole Qanon thing because it lacked source.. No source, no credibility.
Q did claim to rise above anonymity through the "Q proofs" which attempted to link it to the executive branch with plausible deniability. Not saying you should believe them, but whether someone followed Q hinged on their acceptance of the Q proofs, which pushed it above a typical 4chan LARP.
The Ukraine call, russiagate, even the WW1 memorial "suckers" thing all made up. "Yes I can confirm anything you want, I'm familiar with Trump's line of thinking" π€‘
Remember the shithole countries remark? The media went apeshit over that for weeks, including repeating it over and over on live TV. Never confirmed he said it, but who cares, that sounds like something Trump would say!
"very fine people on both sides", "all illegals are rapists and murderers", "people should inject bleach"... It never ends. Just constant lies that too many people actually believe.
Those are a little bit different because they are actually on tape and the media just twisted it or left out context. It's not much better than just making up shit because it has the same effect to smear Trump.
BS dude, "inject bleach" wasn't even close to what he actually talked about.
Are you reading the context of what I wrote? What's the BS dude for?
I talked about two different things, the media making stuff up and the media twisting words and context.
"Those are on tape" - he's not on tape saying these things - the media didn't "just twist it" - they totally made it up, in other words the same thing as your above comment, rather than any different (at least the 2nd two - I'm not familiar with the first one/what he actually said vs what they said he said in the first one).
Not saying they don't do that on the regular, maybe just the examples picked are "baldfaced fabrications" not "twisting words and context."
Sorry for the "BS dude" part, I should've explained this better.
Don't forget "grab them by the pussy" - which was a casual aside of how easy it was to get women when you're famous. Not that he was actually grabbing them by the vagina, was intending to, or ever had. He was talking how a lot of women throw themselves at celebrities and powerful men.
Then we have Clinton and Biden, who literally grab women by the vagina, but hey, there, pal, watch yourself, they're innocent, doncha know.
And remember, Trump said "β¦if they let you". All based on the women allowing him to do it, whether he actually did the deed or not.
Everyone forgot "they let you do it". Besides it's some locker room talk, boasting.
Remember when our corrupt government says we can't know things because it will reveal "sources and methods"?
πI present to you sources and methods π
Our sources don't exist and our methods are criminal.
Welcome to Whose Byline is it Anyway
Which leads to it happening over and over again
OR the even more likely scenario is that literally none of them actually had an "anonymous source" and the whole thing was made the fuck up from the get go.
If I lied to law enforcement, Congress, or my wife, there's no way I'd be able to simply "retract" my statement.
These rat bastards are "fact checkers"?
No.
There are plenty of traitors in government to act as an anonymous source to make up lies for the media. Trump said it at the beginning, something like, "the leaks are real, but the news is fake."
"independently confirmed through their own sources" means they collaborated on the same bullshit
but we are just repeating what we all heard from some rando anonymous dude no one will ever see again!
sure you are...
CNN reports that NBC said that CBS said that MSNBC reported and later passed through Buzzfeed. So they checked each other and nothing is wrong!
I asked my partner at the bank robbery what he saw, and just like me he saw nothing!
Like when Christopher Steele gave the FBI the fake piss dossier and also told Yahoo about it so the FBI had "two sources."
Wasnβt that what they did with the Steele document? Fabricated a yahoo article then cited it?
Don't forget the quote was used in the phony impeachment trial too
It would be a shame if anyone emailed:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Why isn't Trump suing these papers for Defamation? Obviously they haven't learned their lesson after the Nick Sandman lawsuits. Hit them in the pockets.
He should sue them, even just to see how the press covers his lawsuit.
We already know. "Not content with his persecution of journalism as president, Mr. Trump is now suing us for doing our jobs reporting on how he pressured Georgia officials to find non existent evidence of voter fraud." Then they will quietly settle out of court to avoid discovery which could uncover far worse fake news.
Since Trump is a public figure, heβd have to prove that those papers acted with actual malice, which is that the papers knew the info was false or with reckless disregard to it being false or not. Both of those things are very difficult to prove.
Then they should be forced to reveal the source (that obviously did know it was a lie) and let Trump sue them.
In an ordinary case. This one looks easy to prove.
How is it difficult when there is blatant evidence that the source doesn't even exist?
Which is why we need military tribunals, not our regular courts. This is enemy action, not mere defamation.
Because the press has blanket immunity when defaming or slandering public figures. Technically we all do, I think.
Pretty sure they don't have immunity. It's just the bar is so high to win a case that no one ever tries.
You basically have to proven that the media knew at the time that they were reporting false information, but did it anyway specifically to harm a person or group. And because political harm isn't objectively quantifiable, the courts often drop the case as there is no remedy that they can provide.
Immunity is maybe too strong of a word, but it's thanks to "precedence" that the bar is so high. "No Standing," etc.
The courts would throw it out. MOOT
The problem is the Sullivan vs ny times case which roughly stated that the media has wide latitude to lie at will, as long as it wasn't intentionally malicious. Even if the legacy media attacks a public figure, and is found wrong as usual, they just need to say "we didn't know". The fix to this is to get congress to pass some sort of law limiting the power of the press to openly lie for financial gain. Alternatively, we all need to call the press' lies and slander to our friends and family.
Forgot about that. What defines a public figure? I'm certain Trump would fall into that category, but the reason I ask is I believe James O'Keefe is suing the New York Times.
Going to have to be state congresses if you're going to expect that to happen in this environment.
Something rotten in the state of Georgia.At this point a blind man can see the Georgia Republicans were in on it and scared to death.
Hollywood Interlopers and Stacy Abrams bitch
They do it because they keep surviving criminal behavior. If you stay alive after stealing elections, of course you will become arrogant and repeat it.
The Media is the propaganda arm of the Deep State. They collude like this all the time.
The most brazen is when they all clamored to declare Biden the winner.
And Obama made it 100% legal.
I'll never understand why this wasn't fixed in the past 4 years..
Even Trump was surprised by the absolute depravity in place. Next time he will go scorched Earth on these fools.
Trump needs to raze the org chart of every Federal agency five levels deep and have replacements ready to go.
There are a lot of things I expected, and lots of other things trump promised, and very few of them actually happened.
It was simultaneously the best presidential term in the history of the US, and also the most disappointing.
DJT and loyalist admin were too soft and/or naive. And surrounded by snakes they thought were being helpful but really were hampering.
Congress.
Or when they all refused to report on the corruption of the Biden family. State controled press like in China.
Time Magazine: How We Did It -- https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
This is so telling -
"...people thronged cities across the U.S. to celebrate the democratic process that resulted in Trumpβs ouster."
Not "Biden's victory", but "Trump's ouster".
That sums up the MSM these days.
(Disclaimer - the above post should not be interpreted as an acknowledgement that Trump lost a free and fair election. Any and all "Fuck the system", "Why even bother fucking voting", and "Fuck Dominion" comments are presumed without posting. Thank you in advance for not distracting from the subject matter of this thread, even though you think we're retards for not explicitly blaming everything on a "stolen fucking election".)
Somebody please bring the pain already!
Sorry, best the Republicans can do is some strongly-worded tweets.
Obvious at this point that the media is controlled and is working together against the interests of the people of the United States.
The press can no longer be called "The Fourth Branch of Government".
They are on the Federal payroll.
State Propaganda.
It was a perfect phone call. I listened to the whole thing.
What'll happen?
Absolutely nothing.
I have a better shot of Albert Einstein walking up to me and handing me $100.
Or Jeffrey Epstein giving you a free ride to his island
Oh, the ride there is free. You just don't come back.
Hotel California
Link to PJ Media article - https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2021/03/15/the-washington-posts-fake-trump-quote-scandal-is-a-lot-worse-than-you-think-n1432763
Enemy of the people. Fake news. Trump is right by a lot.
Anonymous sources = Trying to legitimize false propaganda
Contender for the Dan Rather Medal of (dis)Honorable Mention.
It's called Laundering. It's all news and journalism is today. One "anonymous" source to write the article. The rest of the "journalists" use this first article as a source and can never be wrong after that because they are simply siting or using the article as a source. Writing anything about that article is technically true even if the article is made up BS.
This is also what is happening in our universities. One person writes for a "peer reviewed" journal with bullshit data and every book written that year quotes the journal and teaches the next group of people the bullshit. Eventually you have people who learned from the book, writing the new books for the next generation to learn from. 10 years ago I had one teacher who had real life experience who would pick and choose what was valuable from the books he taught. The rest of the teachers were so far removed from the real world they couldn't explain or give examples that were not in the book. Today, I would bet there are no teachers left with real world experience in the field they teach.
Obamaβs 2012 NDAA allowed for media to function as propaganda outlets. Thatβs why this is being allowed to happen so frequently with no accountability whatsoever. Journalism is dead.
I'll never understand why this wasn't removed on day 1 in 2017.
this is about the 10th time the media has completely made something up to hurt Trump, parotted it for several days or weeks, only to have it proven completely false. damage done. mission accomplished.
10th? You forgot a few zeros!
Now go back and look at everything else they wrote about President Trump over the past 4+ years.
p.s. I'm fully aware the smooth-brains out there wouldn't care about the truth. They're media induced TDS has fully metastasized.
It's also proof that they're all actually the same company beneath the veneer of separation they use so they don't get sued into the ground via antitrust lawsuits.
the media is the enemy and it is incumbent on we the people to dispense justice as our "justice system" is now corrupt and will allow the left any criminality without consequence.
I have independently confirmed using anonymous sources that the media are a lying sack of shit.
John Brennan enters the chat.
HMMMMMMMM, WHO COULD IT BE, GIVING PASSING ORDERS DOWN FROM THE TOP.... pondering intensifies
I'm more wondering what lodge.
I LMFAO at anyone still buying anything the media says. They are not journalists. They are agenda driven hacks and propagandists. Even if they end up telling the truth once in a while, it's usually for some other reason than wanting to be truthful to the public.
Let me spell it out for the people who haven't caught on yet.
One person creates a lie. They then tell several people. Those several people then confirm it with each other. Thus a lie is incepted as a fact in their minds.
Why? Because literally the dumbest people in America are becoming journalists. They eschewed all their lives basic critical thinking skills. They cheated their way through higher education. They realized access was what minted a journalist so they perverted themselves to cultivate access. Since they're so monumentally dense they thought they were cultivating their sources when their sources were cultivating them as useful idiots.
Seriously, 90% of people in a newsroom will be the most egotistical but dumbest tperson you'll ever meet. It's incredibly obvious with idiots like Don Lemon bit most fly under the radar.
Oh well. Nothing to be done about it except bitch online.
This applies to all of my comments now.
Can't remember where I saw it, but it was leaked group chats from a bunch of senior editors or something of major news networks, showing that they indeed plan the narrative amongst each other. This was years and years back and I didn't think to archive out save it.
Glenn Greenwald has a good and very in depth piece about this sort of thing that he posted today. A good read if you have some spare time.
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/how-do-big-media-outlets-so-often
Enemies domestic
If we had military that upheld their oaths, we'd be in a civil war already.
Little bitty newspapers, such as the weeklies in small towns, have a Code of Ethics that forbids them from publishing anonymous accusations of misconduct. That is, they are required to say who is pushing the accusation.
Isn't it time our national news raised its level of ethics to that of a weekly, local newspaper?
I think it's more likely that Washington post ran the story, and all those other networks ran it again having done no leg work and just lieing about independently confirming it.
Anonymous sources that give false info (if there was a source at all) by law should be doxed. No if and or buts about it.
No accountability for the media. Protected to LIE.
Democracy dies with lies
It's like being caught cheating on your final exam because you had all the same wrong answers as the person you copied off of and then the teacher doesn't care because the class ended weeks ago.
It's never going to stop without accountability
the media has less credibility than 4chan of all places. /pol/ jokes and fucks around constantly but there is still an element of truth to the shitposting while the media just publishes flat-out lies and pushes it as the truth.
Thier ratings are dropping so they are getting more and more desperate. Just keep tuning them out and hopefully capitalism will do its thing. What am I thinking, the dems would probably just bail them out at our expense. Too big to fail...
Jeff Bezos, one of the richest men on the planet, owns the Washington Post.
If the dems even suggested helping WaPo, AOC would lose her shit.
If the name of the source is "Anonymous", I don't want to fucking hear it anymore. Put your name to the claim or it is dismissed as an outright lie from now on.
What will it take to revoke the broadcast licenses of companies that are deemed harmful to the people and the nation?
When proven a liar, anonymous sources should lose anonymity.
Can't Trump sue for defemation?
now that it is confirmed bullshit, can we have these "news" organizations release the name of these anon sources? after all, the contract to keep them anon is to be telling the truth. after all, anyone can make up anon sources.
Why is this a screenshot? Is there an actual article we can visit?
I posted a link with the OP, but it might be difficult to find in the comments.
PJ Media is one of my top 5 sources on the web - https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2021/03/15/the-washington-posts-fake-trump-quote-scandal-is-a-lot-worse-than-you-think-n1432763
Thank you. I also just noticed that teeny-tiny "context" link. How did you do that?
Thank you. I also just noticed that teeny-tiny "context" link which also works.
Nobody will go to jail or be punished. 80% of the country will never hear of this or care. Meanwhile the feds keep arresting people every day for simply being in DC on 1/6 while BLM/ANTIFA continue terrorize the country. We are in deep shit and nobody has a plan to unfuck this mess except "run for mayor in a red state" or "send memes". Gay
Like everything else that's happened for the last five years, this is only bad if you're watching and paying attention. Otherwise it's another conspiracy theory by all the people who have been
Doesnt matter, there are never any consequences for making up literal fake news. They accomplished what they wanted and life goes on for them. We're lucky we even get a minor retraction about this shit at this point.
Sue Sue Sue for defamation
Dumb question here...why is this finally coming out now?