WHY THE FUCK WOULD CUT YOUR TITS OFF TO BE A MAN AND THEN HAVE A FUCKING KID AND WANT TO BREAST FEED THE FUCKING THING? WHAT IN THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH EVERYBODY?
The really sad thing is that if you dig deeper into this issue, lots of these girls have mastectomy surgeries in their teens. Then they grow up. It's a terrible thing to make a lifelong life altering choice as a teenager. The real question is why are doctors performing mastectomies on perfectly healthy teen girls?
Because big medical and big pharma pay alot of money to our crooked ass congress to not regulate and /or de- regulate stuff that would stop this kind of shit. Like fetus harvesting.
Wake me up when mutilating your own body for virtue points and then feeling bad when they didn't get the return on investment isn't something to rally behind.
The sheer fact that at any point in this things life "cutting pieces of my body off" was at any time a good idea, only shines a bright light on the many retards that would have been asylums.
The mastectomy procedure was initially developed to treat cancer (in which case all breast tissue must go), they just repurposed the same procedure.
If the nipples were left, they would be much larger and more sensitive than a mans; though for the most part it's just a matter of expedience.
It's sort of like how in mtf procedures, all but the head of the penis is removed; however, erectile tissue within the clitoris plays a huge role in female sexual function, so they lack both male and female parts.
edit: it is possible perform a nipple sparing mastectomy, as well as reducing the size of the areola (tinted skin around the nipple) but the nipples will still be much larger and more sensitive, unless if feeling is lost in the nipples from nerve damage.
But what "gay" guy or "straight" woman would be turned on by a man with no nipples. 99.99 out of 100, I think people would prefer an overly sensitive nipple to no nipple at all.
1.) They experience body dysphoria, similar to someone who want's to amputate an arm. It's a matter of feeling uncomfortable with their genitals.
2.) It's simply easier to perform a mastectomy without preserving the nipples.
The surgeons who specialize 'gender reassignments' usually aren't very good at what they do. Surgeons are fully aware of the permanent harm they are causing, so gender reassignment attracts less scrupulous doctors. Even just comparing the surgical technique between gender surgeries and most other surgeries, they are just sloppy.
In the NHS, surgical oncologists are REQUIRED to perform mastectomies while breast cancer patients have their surgeries delayed, so they use the most time efficient technique so their cancer patients don't die on a wait-list, hence the nipple goes.
I mean, I’m not going to pile on their tweet because detrans is probably a good thing, but this is one of those things that makes me realize that my faith in humanity can in fact get lower. How can someone be that stupid? Not just chopping your tits off, but also somehow not realizing that means no feeding babies.....
I have accepted that there are some people I will never understand. I feel bad for these people and their acts, but I have no Idea and no desire to understand how they got here.
WHY THE FUCK WOULD CUT YOUR TITS OFF TO BE A MAN AND THEN HAVE A FUCKING KID AND WANT TO BREAST FEED THE FUCKING THING? WHAT IN THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH EVERYBODY?
It’s mind blowing
The really sad thing is that if you dig deeper into this issue, lots of these girls have mastectomy surgeries in their teens. Then they grow up. It's a terrible thing to make a lifelong life altering choice as a teenager. The real question is why are doctors performing mastectomies on perfectly healthy teen girls?
Because big medical and big pharma pay alot of money to our crooked ass congress to not regulate and /or de- regulate stuff that would stop this kind of shit. Like fetus harvesting.
Facebook Dopamine “Like” addiction
Mental illnesses but we can't say it for fear of hurting their feelings.
That baby probably feels ripped off.
Wake me up when mutilating your own body for virtue points and then feeling bad when they didn't get the return on investment isn't something to rally behind.
The sheer fact that at any point in this things life "cutting pieces of my body off" was at any time a good idea, only shines a bright light on the many retards that would have been asylums.
Don't hate on this person, they fucked up and are trying to let people know.
Hate the sin not the sinner
Each one of these is a redpill
They cut the nipple off too?
I've always wondered why they did that...men have nipples.... I'm so confused
The mastectomy procedure was initially developed to treat cancer (in which case all breast tissue must go), they just repurposed the same procedure.
If the nipples were left, they would be much larger and more sensitive than a mans; though for the most part it's just a matter of expedience.
It's sort of like how in mtf procedures, all but the head of the penis is removed; however, erectile tissue within the clitoris plays a huge role in female sexual function, so they lack both male and female parts.
edit: it is possible perform a nipple sparing mastectomy, as well as reducing the size of the areola (tinted skin around the nipple) but the nipples will still be much larger and more sensitive, unless if feeling is lost in the nipples from nerve damage.
But what "gay" guy or "straight" woman would be turned on by a man with no nipples. 99.99 out of 100, I think people would prefer an overly sensitive nipple to no nipple at all.
1.) They experience body dysphoria, similar to someone who want's to amputate an arm. It's a matter of feeling uncomfortable with their genitals.
2.) It's simply easier to perform a mastectomy without preserving the nipples.
The surgeons who specialize 'gender reassignments' usually aren't very good at what they do. Surgeons are fully aware of the permanent harm they are causing, so gender reassignment attracts less scrupulous doctors. Even just comparing the surgical technique between gender surgeries and most other surgeries, they are just sloppy.
In the NHS, surgical oncologists are REQUIRED to perform mastectomies while breast cancer patients have their surgeries delayed, so they use the most time efficient technique so their cancer patients don't die on a wait-list, hence the nipple goes.
Everything about this subject is gross and sad
Never knew straight women found nipples attractive.
We need to build insane asylums
I mean, I’m not going to pile on their tweet because detrans is probably a good thing, but this is one of those things that makes me realize that my faith in humanity can in fact get lower. How can someone be that stupid? Not just chopping your tits off, but also somehow not realizing that means no feeding babies.....
Imagine hating yourself so much you would cut your healthy breasts off.
Just boggles my mind.
Who would fuck that
You mean if you cut off the glands that produce and store milk, you can't feed your baby? Weird.
I cut my legs off and now I can’t walk. I found out the hard way.
honkhonk
There are a couple lessons in life we all must learn the hard way. This one, however, seems pretty obvious. . . /sigh
I have accepted that there are some people I will never understand. I feel bad for these people and their acts, but I have no Idea and no desire to understand how they got here.
Imagine just looking down and seeing NOTHING. No breasts, no nipples, no penis or vagine... Just emptiness and then a fleshy hole...
I just can't understand why somebody would want to do this to themselves even mentally ill... It's wild
The lgbtjsushdkd gay industry needs their sheep to push their liberal propoganda. They act like they’re 50% of the population when it’s really 1%
Yikes