MANLEY: So exactly how much risk reduction are the manufacturers crediting their vaccine with?
BROWN: The reduced risk of COVID-19 infection reported by the manufacturers is approximately 95%, which is an accurate relative risk reduction measure. However, missing from the vaccine reports are absolute risk reduction measures which are much more clinically relevant to the reduced risk of COVID-19 infection. The absolute risk reduction of the vaccines in the present critical appraisal is approximately 1%, indicating practically no clinical efficacy or usefulness of the vaccines to reduce COVID-19 infection.
MANLEY: Essentially, then you are saying for all practical purposes, the vaccine is useless and ineffective?
BROWN: For applied clinical and public health interventions, yes, they appear to be almost completely ineffective. The members of the FDA advisory committee overlooked FDA guidelines to include absolute reduction measures when reporting clinical trial outcomes to the public, leading to outcome reporting bias in the FDA’s authorization of the mRNA vaccines.
I'm a relatively new user to this forum (stayed away while Reddit was the host..) but I've used many Internet forums over the decades. The problem with this Reddit style forum is that the same stories are much too easy to repeat, the threading is not that great and there is no encouragement to look for the same story before posting it again in order to keep the board less chaotic.
I'm grateful for the platform but I think it could use a rethink. However I'm sure that a lot of people would not like this because people usually get upset with change.
As for the story, it may need to be reposted or it may already have been. I don't know. That said, there is no doubt that it is important information.
Uhh, this thread needs to be made sticky IMO.
:EXCERPT:
MANLEY: So exactly how much risk reduction are the manufacturers crediting their vaccine with?
BROWN: The reduced risk of COVID-19 infection reported by the manufacturers is approximately 95%, which is an accurate relative risk reduction measure. However, missing from the vaccine reports are absolute risk reduction measures which are much more clinically relevant to the reduced risk of COVID-19 infection. The absolute risk reduction of the vaccines in the present critical appraisal is approximately 1%, indicating practically no clinical efficacy or usefulness of the vaccines to reduce COVID-19 infection.
MANLEY: Essentially, then you are saying for all practical purposes, the vaccine is useless and ineffective?
BROWN: For applied clinical and public health interventions, yes, they appear to be almost completely ineffective. The members of the FDA advisory committee overlooked FDA guidelines to include absolute reduction measures when reporting clinical trial outcomes to the public, leading to outcome reporting bias in the FDA’s authorization of the mRNA vaccines.
Looks like only you & me get to know the truth... how to get facts like this across better? Catchier headline?
I'm a relatively new user to this forum (stayed away while Reddit was the host..) but I've used many Internet forums over the decades. The problem with this Reddit style forum is that the same stories are much too easy to repeat, the threading is not that great and there is no encouragement to look for the same story before posting it again in order to keep the board less chaotic.
I'm grateful for the platform but I think it could use a rethink. However I'm sure that a lot of people would not like this because people usually get upset with change.
As for the story, it may need to be reposted or it may already have been. I don't know. That said, there is no doubt that it is important information.