His point is to deflect from the real reasons that 31% of the signatures came from non-Republicans.
Those reasons would start with illegal lockdowns and probably end with making $1 billion no-bid deals with China for PPE, but it's a pretty freakin long list.
so What is his point? Even if this were true which it is not, The signatures would still be valid. . Talk about a moron.
His point is to deflect from the real reasons that 31% of the signatures came from non-Republicans.
Those reasons would start with illegal lockdowns and probably end with making $1 billion no-bid deals with China for PPE, but it's a pretty freakin long list.
Thanks.