"I'm too drunk to deal with this shit. I'ma go fuck an intern and crash, govern yourselves for the next 4 years. Just remember the constitution you fucks because if I have to come back, I'ma kick your asses."
Putin is nationalistic and want to Make Russia Great Again .... thats why he is considered so bad by the globalists and the swamp governing the western countries.
Look at the media treatment of Putin and Trump and its very very similar. nothing that Putin does is ever covered by the MSM in a positive light. Exactly like how they covered Trump.
Because both are nationalists and their policies go directly against the globalists agenda for their Great Reset and one world government.
Because he's an ex-KGB and cause 'grumpy' McCain who is a RINO himself said so. Though, Putin was at his best a Lt. Colonel stationed in Dresden .... nowhere near any major KGB positions .... and other more qualified and well-known ex-KGB could have succeeded Yeltsin etc.
So, basically Putin is anti-Cold War, while the Liberal, Fascist establishment in the US is not.
I don't really know either, but I'd like to re-examine what I do know
Which is:
Beneficiary of sham elections
Bully and scoundrel when it comes to international politics
Thug-like Russian tough guy, because that's the only way to get respect in Russia
Homophobic, at least in terms of policy
Keeps the press on a tight leash
What a jerk, right? Well, in 2015 I'd say so. But today.... The sanctity of democracy isn't as shiny as it used to be. I now think playing rough in politics is more good than bad, as long as it's necessary. And I now think acceptance of homosexuality is inextricable from a dramatic slippery slope of moral degeneracy that threatens western civilization. Finally, my sympathy for the professional press has completely evaporated.
Which puts me back to square one with my opinion of Putin. I have no idea what to think.
The problem is, how do we know it was a sham election? How do we know anything said about the man is accurate? The press have completely proven over the last year how they simply cannot be trusted to be objective or partial about anything, as if somehow over the last decade or two any genuine honesty in the press has just completely evaporated.
It is okay to find a laugh in "liking" Putin for a news cycle. He is a class A shitbird, but the man did claw back law and order from an apocalyptic mess that was the ruins of the USSR
Twitter was one of the main ways Trump would communicate with the people until it stabbed him in the back - before that why would Trump shut it down? Of course Twitter made a lot of money from Trump.
Putin mostly relies on the state run Russian MSM which is all controlled by the government.
The biggest threat to Russia and Putin is social rot and decay. It got em in the cold war and putin ahould do whatever he can to stop it from happening again. Dorsey and zuck should be enemies of every free State.
Eventually Putin will be the most popular world leader. Nancy challenged Trump over allowing America to split over abortion. The hill the Democrats and Tech Giants will die on, will be the promotion of sexual abuse of children as some kind of normal behavior.
Well- he games his laws to stay in power like a totalitarian leader. He has people killed- political opponents. He’s definitely a bad guy. He just looks like an angel when compared to the US Deep state forever-totalitarian regime.
The Romans actually had that as part of their Republic. During times of war, they elected a dictator who would voluntarily give up power after the war was over.
That's true, tho then it became the Roman Empire, and the Emperor ruled for life, which did not go so well during many of the later Emperors. Putin signed into a law letting him basically rule for ever. Xi did too.
The semantic trappings of "President" and a parliament and "elections"--the words of modernity--don't actually change the reality of Russian government, which has always been autocratic, and will be for the foreseeable future.
There is a lot to condemn about autocratic government--we're really on the precipice of reliving a nightmarish re-up version of the 17th century here, complete with a path to "rediscovering" philosophies of personal liberty and responsible governance, after some severe prices are sure to paid--but it's also somewhat ironic that since our increasingly-autocratic government is looking out for foreign interests and the personal wealth of its direct participants first and foremost, we find ourselves looking fondly on autocrats who at least have the basic dignity of their country in mind.
There are autocratic dictators who have their nation's interests at heart, like Napoleon.
There are democratic governments that subvert their own nation's interests, like the Biden administration.
And the truth is, it doesn't appear to be the case that democracies are especially good at producing the good results. Monarchic succession produces erratic results, and democracy produces gradual decay. But democracy is also prone to being manipulated by shadow oligarchies.
Democracy's strength is to peacefully gain the consent of the losers. But when the importance of that consent is denied, as in 2020, and the results are as bad as any we can think of, then what is an American patriot to do?
I've been watching Putin in the news for 20 years. I observed the poisoning of Litvinenko, the gunning down of Politkovskaya in the elevator, the exiling of Khodorkovsky, the war in Chechnya, the annexation of Crimea, etc. Meanwhile, the US did its own "things".
At no point in time did I ever get the impression that Putin wants to antagonize the US. What he's doing – and the reason he is vilified in the West – is preventing Russia being taken over by the same mafia that controls the US and Europe. This includes the CIA, the Western oligarchs, and the Western media, who run the parts of the world they control in much more cynical, and more self-serving ways than our "fake news" presents. Journalist Udo Ulfkotte regretted being part of this, wrote a book on it, and died of a heart attack.
They want control of Russia, they almost had it under Yeltsin, and Putin is the reason they can't have it. This is why they hate him.
Of course, when they blow up Harrison Deal in his car as a threat to governor Kemp when he was dangerously close to authorizing an election audit, this is in no way like the poisoning of Litvinenko. Not that this excuses Putin. Or does it? What has he been up against?
He seems to stand for something because he's sacrificing a lot of potential GDP by refusing to let the CIA take over. If he allowed the CIA to take over the Russian economy, Western press would be favorable, Russian prosperity would increase without sanctions, Putin's personal prosperity would improve, but he would be their puppet. It seems he prefers to be the vilified outsider than to agree to this.
Putin replaced one set of oligarchs with another set of oligarchies, except they are his oligarchs. Don't cry for Mr. Putin, his family is probably very wealthy. Meanwhile Russia has its own opioid epidemic, but the drug in this case is known as vodka.
Having been a "rich Westerner" in a "shithole country" for a few years, I can say it's much better to do well in a rich country, than to knock it out of the park in a poor country. No amount of money can buy what the country simply doesn't have.
Fair points otherwise. If I was running Russia though, I'd try to make it rich, and not just by selling gas and oil. To make a country rich, you need integrity and trustworthiness throughout the economy, and that's where Putin is failing. Can't be rich every man for himself.
You're leaving out oil. Putin is at war politically and literally in Syria, because the Sauds and the EU and the US under Obama wanted to push Saud pipelines to the EU, because of Russia's dominance in the natgas markets.
I won't say Putin is a good guy, because he's not. But he's not threatening EU with nukes, he's not trying to start wars, he's just trying to keep what is Russia's - and like you said, keeping the mafia out of his country.
But he was demonized for over 2 decades now by the Hillary/Obama crowd, because of oil. Because it's always about oil. All of it.
Thats the thing. He is a russian first guy. He does things the russian way for what is better for him and russia. He is good at it. Thats the problem with the west, we have let such subversion of culutre and corruption happen that we are in splinters everywhere. Like the romans before the collapse of the republic. Then the empire before aurelian tried to save it and got killed for his trouble.
We dislike him because LGBTQ+ propaganda is forbidden to be taught in Russian schools. He also had the guts to call Pope Frances NOT a real Christian. Just look it up. He's anti-Vatican and anti-Globalist.
Russia is very conservative about things like that - someone I know was just telling me how a large cam studio was recently shut down in Moscow because even camming for cash is not allowed there, under their pornography laws. What he was saying is that watching porn isn't illegal there, but producing it is. I haven't researched this, but a quick peek on duck duck showed a link that they banned Chaturbate there two years ago.
Imagine if the US banned camming, and onlyfans. Imagine the riots.
That's because Putin understands the globalists and doesn't want them to take control of the country again like they have with China and the USA. After all he was a student of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn before his passing.
Putin also passed a law banning gay couples from adopting children. When China (with their initiative to promote masculinity) and Russia start acting in ways you agree with it certainly makes for a very confusing time indeed.
Apparently he has strong Christian convictions for a very long time and has used them to rule his nation to try to instill good morals amongst his people. Not sure though since our media has lied to us about every foreign national as well as lied their asses off about our very own Govt leaders as well.
He was balls deep in the KGB and has pretty ruthlessly held onto power. I'm not going to say he's the devil incarnate, but one good move from the guy isn't going to win my affections or loyalty.
In a "classic" power structure, independent (or largely independent) of the Greco-Roman/Western tradition, ruthless actions to stay on top is literally The Game, the only game, and it is further the "natural" order of things. Only through sweat, blood, and tears are (artificial) "fair" systems of governance (temporarily) forced into existence. As our own government slips further into its own form of neo-autocracy--though more akin to a foreign occupation than a strongman takeover--we can only hope there is a way to reintroduce the nobility of self-governance to normies. But first, the gibs must be halted, and there'll be hell to pay for that.
Too busy banning people for political wrongthink than to worry about children being exploited in the most depraved ways possible and then having sickos all over the world getting off on it on their platform.
I mean, they did seize Crimea only a few years ago citing the same reasoning Hitler had ("the consolidation of german/russian speaking peoples") and absolutely sent Spetsnaz into the eastern provinces of Ukraine in an attempt to stir up rebellion and insurrection.
A warm-water port is crucial to Russian security and trade interests, and slicing it off to hand to the newly re-independent Ukraine was the top slap to the former Soviet Union. You may recall that Russia had previously gone to great lengths to try and secure Sevastopol (just ask Leo Tolstoy). The move completely outmaneuvered Obama's foreign policy, though to be fair, that wasn't particularly difficult.
they did seize Crimea only a few years ago citing the same reasoning Hitler had ("the consolidation of german/russian speaking peoples")
But whether that's good or bad depends entirely on whether or not it's true. Consolidating a common people under common rule is good. If it's not a common people, if it's not popular (in actuality, not just politically), or if that's just a cover for less noble reason, then it's bad.
To be fair, they just took back their own property. They’ve owned Crimea since 1770…it was only “given” to Ukraine during the USSR days to simplify administration due to its proximity.
The people overwhelmingly voted to re-join Russia numerous times, starting in like 1992.
I can’t believe they are trying to hide behind section 230. Surely, not taking down CHILD PORN when you’ve been repeatedly asked to do so is breaking the law. Pretty ironic that Parler and gab got yeeted for their TOS. At least they don’t have CP on there.
One day sweety when you move out of mommy's basement and you, perhaps, obtain some REAL authority for once in your miserable life - you'll learn the importance of grandstanding, of issuing warnings, and ultimately, of gaining compliance.
Notice the lack of substance to your rebuttal. You know I'm right, you're too much of a coward to refute what I said.
You don't just kick out a company worth hundreds of billions overnight any more than you'd ban IPhones or Coca Cola overnight. Even in countries not named United States, apparently the bastion of due process (?), there's rules to this shit.
Only a brainwashed fucking fool thinks every country BUT the USA is run by an autocrat who rules by fiat. Such a shit take.
Putin in 2015: The New World Order worships Satan... "though they push militant secularism on the societies they are trying to undermine – are closet Satanists."
You know, seriously...i have actually contemplated moving to fucking Russia with all of this bullshit going on here. FFS, what a u-turn from the 60's...
And all we will hear from the pedo lefties is that the EVIL PUTIN wanted to block Twitter. I could care less if it was Putin or some soccer mom, kiddie porn is wrong.
I get that but we spend so much more time focused on foreign leaders and how they are allegedly out to get us when it's our very own who we should be more concerned with ruining this country.
Russia is based. The biggest threat to the globalists plan for worldwide communism are countries that used to be communist or socialist but since then learned the hard way that it does not work and switched to capitalism.
Russian censorship is even worse that what we're experiencing now in the US. Putin's just pissed because he doesn't want to share the power with twitter.
And child porn is always the go-to accusation when you want to vilify someone. Of course I would villify twitter for shitting all over freedom of speech, and actively manipulating the population, but Putin could hardly complain about someone doing that, haha.
And the MSM still has it that it was Russia, Russia, Russia.
Has been China since the USSR was brought down. Right BIll?
Note: That Putin kicked out the Central Bank and banned Soros from entering Russia ever. I would say for that he is a white hat. You might think that he and POTUS Trump are working in unison against the globalists?
LMFAO PUTIS is PROVING to the world HE is a better LEADER than XIDEN!
Biden is a puppet. Literally any one of us on this site would be a better president
I would be shitfaced 24/7 and would still probably do better
Go to bed, nancy.
I don't think I could manage being a pretty pink little princess, but I could certainly become President and do great.
Me too especially with the shining example of a president we just had. I would do what President Trump did and put America first.
Legitimately.
"I'm too drunk to deal with this shit. I'ma go fuck an intern and crash, govern yourselves for the next 4 years. Just remember the constitution you fucks because if I have to come back, I'ma kick your asses."
Would be best president ever.
Tell ya what, we'd be out of the middle east 5 minutes ago, that's for damn sure.
Just before glassing it and turning it into a glass factory.
Lol. Nukes for everyone.
What makes Putin so bad? Just generally wondering. Idk much about his leadership.
I know he's a talented man, but idk shit about what he's done as Russia's leader, and if he's been good or bad for Russia as a whole.
Putin is nationalistic and want to Make Russia Great Again .... thats why he is considered so bad by the globalists and the swamp governing the western countries.
Look at the media treatment of Putin and Trump and its very very similar. nothing that Putin does is ever covered by the MSM in a positive light. Exactly like how they covered Trump.
Because both are nationalists and their policies go directly against the globalists agenda for their Great Reset and one world government.
Because he's an ex-KGB and cause 'grumpy' McCain who is a RINO himself said so. Though, Putin was at his best a Lt. Colonel stationed in Dresden .... nowhere near any major KGB positions .... and other more qualified and well-known ex-KGB could have succeeded Yeltsin etc.
So, basically Putin is anti-Cold War, while the Liberal, Fascist establishment in the US is not.
I don't really know either, but I'd like to re-examine what I do know
Which is:
Beneficiary of sham elections
Bully and scoundrel when it comes to international politics
Thug-like Russian tough guy, because that's the only way to get respect in Russia
Homophobic, at least in terms of policy
Keeps the press on a tight leash
What a jerk, right? Well, in 2015 I'd say so. But today.... The sanctity of democracy isn't as shiny as it used to be. I now think playing rough in politics is more good than bad, as long as it's necessary. And I now think acceptance of homosexuality is inextricable from a dramatic slippery slope of moral degeneracy that threatens western civilization. Finally, my sympathy for the professional press has completely evaporated.
Which puts me back to square one with my opinion of Putin. I have no idea what to think.
I dunno, everything except for the sham elections part from that list sounds pretty based to me
The problem is, how do we know it was a sham election? How do we know anything said about the man is accurate? The press have completely proven over the last year how they simply cannot be trusted to be objective or partial about anything, as if somehow over the last decade or two any genuine honesty in the press has just completely evaporated.
Good point
It is okay to find a laugh in "liking" Putin for a news cycle. He is a class A shitbird, but the man did claw back law and order from an apocalyptic mess that was the ruins of the USSR
And Obama is the one with his hand up Biden’s ass
I'm sure I would suck at it.
Hate to say it, but Trump never had the balls to do this. Is Putin a better leader than Trump too?
Putin is a quasi monarch and has way more power in his country than Trump could ever dream of having.
In Russia, Putin governs the law. He controls all powers.
something that does not happen in the United States, although the extreme left commies wants to do it right now
Trump couldn't just shut stuff down. Putin is a tyrant, but a based one
Twitter was one of the main ways Trump would communicate with the people until it stabbed him in the back - before that why would Trump shut it down? Of course Twitter made a lot of money from Trump.
Putin mostly relies on the state run Russian MSM which is all controlled by the government.
The slowest, most obvious, telling you "i am going to stab you in the back", back stab ever.
No, because Trump was not a near-dictator and tried to work with our institutions.
Pedo Biden is not a leader, he is a tyrant set by the Globalist Elite
Putin should assassinate all these tech oligarchs before it's too late.
The biggest threat to Russia and Putin is social rot and decay. It got em in the cold war and putin ahould do whatever he can to stop it from happening again. Dorsey and zuck should be enemies of every free State.
Don't forget that weasel Sundar Pachai!
Do you think he would destroy it or try to corrupt it to use as his own?
Every country's leader is likely frothing at the mouth with the power social media and media provides.
In a game of course
no.
lol
based and polonium pilled
😂👍🏻😂👍🏻
He already did a few in the 90s/00s in the past. Russian Oligarchs of course.
I know. So he's got experience and can get the job done right.
Eventually Putin will be the most popular world leader. Nancy challenged Trump over allowing America to split over abortion. The hill the Democrats and Tech Giants will die on, will be the promotion of sexual abuse of children as some kind of normal behavior.
Is it bad that I fully agree with Russia on this? US and Russia have a bad history, but lately they seem to say a lot of stuff we might agree with.
I am beginning to re-evaluate my opinion of Putin. He is far more sane that the present American presidential administration.
There’s a lot of truth to the condemnations of Putin as an autocratic dictator.
And he is still less evil than the evil people who run our country.
i am beginning to think there are far more untruths than truths
Well- he games his laws to stay in power like a totalitarian leader. He has people killed- political opponents. He’s definitely a bad guy. He just looks like an angel when compared to the US Deep state forever-totalitarian regime.
Depends who he is killing to keep out...
I wouldn’t mind an American Putin for a term or two.
Yeah. That is so fucked up.
Putin may not be our friend but he is the enemy of our enemy
This. ^^
WE could use an autocratic dictator right about now.
The Romans actually had that as part of their Republic. During times of war, they elected a dictator who would voluntarily give up power after the war was over.
That's true, tho then it became the Roman Empire, and the Emperor ruled for life, which did not go so well during many of the later Emperors. Putin signed into a law letting him basically rule for ever. Xi did too.
The semantic trappings of "President" and a parliament and "elections"--the words of modernity--don't actually change the reality of Russian government, which has always been autocratic, and will be for the foreseeable future.
There is a lot to condemn about autocratic government--we're really on the precipice of reliving a nightmarish re-up version of the 17th century here, complete with a path to "rediscovering" philosophies of personal liberty and responsible governance, after some severe prices are sure to paid--but it's also somewhat ironic that since our increasingly-autocratic government is looking out for foreign interests and the personal wealth of its direct participants first and foremost, we find ourselves looking fondly on autocrats who at least have the basic dignity of their country in mind.
Well said.
There are autocratic dictators who have their nation's interests at heart, like Napoleon.
There are democratic governments that subvert their own nation's interests, like the Biden administration.
And the truth is, it doesn't appear to be the case that democracies are especially good at producing the good results. Monarchic succession produces erratic results, and democracy produces gradual decay. But democracy is also prone to being manipulated by shadow oligarchies.
Democracy's strength is to peacefully gain the consent of the losers. But when the importance of that consent is denied, as in 2020, and the results are as bad as any we can think of, then what is an American patriot to do?
This is what I think, and this is why I can't condemn or approve somebody like Putin on demand.
fact is if you are not an autocratic dictator your country will eventually be taken over by degeneracy
democracy is easily manipulated
Putin has done great things for Russia. He is an amazing leader.
The only reason we dislike him is that Russia is a bit at odds with the USA.
I've been watching Putin in the news for 20 years. I observed the poisoning of Litvinenko, the gunning down of Politkovskaya in the elevator, the exiling of Khodorkovsky, the war in Chechnya, the annexation of Crimea, etc. Meanwhile, the US did its own "things".
At no point in time did I ever get the impression that Putin wants to antagonize the US. What he's doing – and the reason he is vilified in the West – is preventing Russia being taken over by the same mafia that controls the US and Europe. This includes the CIA, the Western oligarchs, and the Western media, who run the parts of the world they control in much more cynical, and more self-serving ways than our "fake news" presents. Journalist Udo Ulfkotte regretted being part of this, wrote a book on it, and died of a heart attack.
They want control of Russia, they almost had it under Yeltsin, and Putin is the reason they can't have it. This is why they hate him.
Of course, when they blow up Harrison Deal in his car as a threat to governor Kemp when he was dangerously close to authorizing an election audit, this is in no way like the poisoning of Litvinenko. Not that this excuses Putin. Or does it? What has he been up against?
Putin does the same shit as the corrupt fucks over here. The only difference is doesn't give a fuck about optics.
He seems to stand for something because he's sacrificing a lot of potential GDP by refusing to let the CIA take over. If he allowed the CIA to take over the Russian economy, Western press would be favorable, Russian prosperity would increase without sanctions, Putin's personal prosperity would improve, but he would be their puppet. It seems he prefers to be the vilified outsider than to agree to this.
Putin replaced one set of oligarchs with another set of oligarchies, except they are his oligarchs. Don't cry for Mr. Putin, his family is probably very wealthy. Meanwhile Russia has its own opioid epidemic, but the drug in this case is known as vodka.
Having been a "rich Westerner" in a "shithole country" for a few years, I can say it's much better to do well in a rich country, than to knock it out of the park in a poor country. No amount of money can buy what the country simply doesn't have.
Fair points otherwise. If I was running Russia though, I'd try to make it rich, and not just by selling gas and oil. To make a country rich, you need integrity and trustworthiness throughout the economy, and that's where Putin is failing. Can't be rich every man for himself.
You're leaving out oil. Putin is at war politically and literally in Syria, because the Sauds and the EU and the US under Obama wanted to push Saud pipelines to the EU, because of Russia's dominance in the natgas markets.
I won't say Putin is a good guy, because he's not. But he's not threatening EU with nukes, he's not trying to start wars, he's just trying to keep what is Russia's - and like you said, keeping the mafia out of his country.
But he was demonized for over 2 decades now by the Hillary/Obama crowd, because of oil. Because it's always about oil. All of it.
Points appreciated – Putin definitely wants Europe to be his oil and natural gas market, and opposes competition in this respect.
Thats the thing. He is a russian first guy. He does things the russian way for what is better for him and russia. He is good at it. Thats the problem with the west, we have let such subversion of culutre and corruption happen that we are in splinters everywhere. Like the romans before the collapse of the republic. Then the empire before aurelian tried to save it and got killed for his trouble.
USA is the whore country. Spreads it's legs to the highest bidder.
We dislike him because LGBTQ+ propaganda is forbidden to be taught in Russian schools. He also had the guts to call Pope Frances NOT a real Christian. Just look it up. He's anti-Vatican and anti-Globalist.
Eastern orthodox christians are sort of anti-Vatican by definition.
Russia is very conservative about things like that - someone I know was just telling me how a large cam studio was recently shut down in Moscow because even camming for cash is not allowed there, under their pornography laws. What he was saying is that watching porn isn't illegal there, but producing it is. I haven't researched this, but a quick peek on duck duck showed a link that they banned Chaturbate there two years ago.
Imagine if the US banned camming, and onlyfans. Imagine the riots.
That's because Putin understands the globalists and doesn't want them to take control of the country again like they have with China and the USA. After all he was a student of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn before his passing.
By a mile. Its like you want to root for the home team but theyre lunatics out to destroy the team.
Putin nobly cherishes and puts Russians first, he's our enemy and he is brutal but he is a decent enemy to have.
If only we had someone in our OWN Government that put their nation, America, first.
They won't allow it, and the biggest victory they've claimed is we can't even name them.
Hint: read the Talmud
Putin also passed a law banning gay couples from adopting children. When China (with their initiative to promote masculinity) and Russia start acting in ways you agree with it certainly makes for a very confusing time indeed.
So Putin is demanding Twitter block all Democrat politicians and their kids?
No, just the ones who...
Oh, wait...never mind
::blush::
It’s fucked that Russia is doing this and not the US.
Now we see why Putin is smeared endlessly by our “press”
Since when does Putin have better morals that the current leaders of the USA?
Apparently he has strong Christian convictions for a very long time and has used them to rule his nation to try to instill good morals amongst his people. Not sure though since our media has lied to us about every foreign national as well as lied their asses off about our very own Govt leaders as well.
He was balls deep in the KGB and has pretty ruthlessly held onto power. I'm not going to say he's the devil incarnate, but one good move from the guy isn't going to win my affections or loyalty.
In a "classic" power structure, independent (or largely independent) of the Greco-Roman/Western tradition, ruthless actions to stay on top is literally The Game, the only game, and it is further the "natural" order of things. Only through sweat, blood, and tears are (artificial) "fair" systems of governance (temporarily) forced into existence. As our own government slips further into its own form of neo-autocracy--though more akin to a foreign occupation than a strongman takeover--we can only hope there is a way to reintroduce the nobility of self-governance to normies. But first, the gibs must be halted, and there'll be hell to pay for that.
I don't disagree at all. My point, though, is that his policies are hardly the acts of a "strong Christian"
Yeah, he's pretty much in a loooooong line of ruthless Russian rulers since Ivan the Terrible.
Putin is dope sometimes
60% of the time, Putin is based....all the time
Ooohhh now I see why the Dems hate Putin so much. He's going after their hobbies.
Too busy banning people for political wrongthink than to worry about children being exploited in the most depraved ways possible and then having sickos all over the world getting off on it on their platform.
Such a bold stance the Russian leader is approaching. Here in America, we put people who display and/or share child abuse porn in prison,,,,right?
No, we put them in the White House.
Dominion puts them in the White House
I dont support Putin in some of his policies;
but the videos I have seen of him trying to support families and the middle class is rife.
he is poignant and succinct in his endeavors.
but hes a white man so naturally the libtards hate him.
its funny to me, the russians and others I have met in the gaming world...
we see it truly; thee MSM/dems have led a russiaphobia on the world.
sad and yet not surprising.
much love to you russian pedes. and kazakh and others...
I mean, they did seize Crimea only a few years ago citing the same reasoning Hitler had ("the consolidation of german/russian speaking peoples") and absolutely sent Spetsnaz into the eastern provinces of Ukraine in an attempt to stir up rebellion and insurrection.
So not really any worse than the US has done many times.
Not pretending it is, just not jumping on Putin's fuck for saying evil people are evil.
A warm-water port is crucial to Russian security and trade interests, and slicing it off to hand to the newly re-independent Ukraine was the top slap to the former Soviet Union. You may recall that Russia had previously gone to great lengths to try and secure Sevastopol (just ask Leo Tolstoy). The move completely outmaneuvered Obama's foreign policy, though to be fair, that wasn't particularly difficult.
Nothing you said justifies the invasion of troops into another sovereign state.
I doubt you'd feel the same way about reoccupying Hawaii years after Biden cedes it to China. It's Chinese territory; how dare we!
How about instead of making assumptions about my opinion you come up with a substantiative counter-argument.
Then remember that it was obama's line that he crossed with impunity.
... after the CIA coup in Kiev overthrew the government.
But whether that's good or bad depends entirely on whether or not it's true. Consolidating a common people under common rule is good. If it's not a common people, if it's not popular (in actuality, not just politically), or if that's just a cover for less noble reason, then it's bad.
To be fair, they just took back their own property. They’ve owned Crimea since 1770…it was only “given” to Ukraine during the USSR days to simplify administration due to its proximity.
The people overwhelmingly voted to re-join Russia numerous times, starting in like 1992.
Good old Russia
Old Russia is best Russia.
No, not THAT Russia. The one before it.
The one before the media attacked it.
No, the one before before that one lol
Can’t wait to see how lefties try to spin this. NO, PUTIN IS BAD BECAUSE CHILD PORN IS GOOD!
(For the record, and for the FBI agents reading this, I don’t think child porn is good, so don’t take this out of context)
The FBI agents reading this already think that.
I can’t believe they are trying to hide behind section 230. Surely, not taking down CHILD PORN when you’ve been repeatedly asked to do so is breaking the law. Pretty ironic that Parler and gab got yeeted for their TOS. At least they don’t have CP on there.
So Putin is Making Russia Great Again.
Big surprise! Twitter has a problem with that.
Unlike Trump. Putin is actually able to do something about the SJW infection.
TFW you start to agree with Kim Jong-On and Puton more than the moron leading America.
I remember watching a video where this flaming gay dude was provoking some police officer in Russia.
The officer just decked him in the face.
The guy dropped like a sack of potatoes, and was then arrested.
Good times 👍
Man if only our leadership had 1/100th of Putin's giant steel balls....
When Russians have more morals than our politicians, WE ALL KNOW WE ARE FUCKED!
When Putin is a better leader than anyone in the west shit is really damn bad.
Always with the threats, even in Putin's Russia! Just fucking block them now if you're even remotely serious.
One day sweety when you move out of mommy's basement and you, perhaps, obtain some REAL authority for once in your miserable life - you'll learn the importance of grandstanding, of issuing warnings, and ultimately, of gaining compliance.
Watch out everyone! We got ourselves and internet badass over here! Don't get too close or you might cut yourself!
Notice the lack of substance to your rebuttal. You know I'm right, you're too much of a coward to refute what I said.
You don't just kick out a company worth hundreds of billions overnight any more than you'd ban IPhones or Coca Cola overnight. Even in countries not named United States, apparently the bastion of due process (?), there's rules to this shit.
Only a brainwashed fucking fool thinks every country BUT the USA is run by an autocrat who rules by fiat. Such a shit take.
I’m with Vlad on this one.
Da fuck...Burma, Australia, India, Russia are all more based than the US now..
Finally a world leader who ISN’T a pedo!
Putin in 2015: The New World Order worships Satan... "though they push militant secularism on the societies they are trying to undermine – are closet Satanists."
Putin? I am a big fan now. Like, a big big fan.
You know, seriously...i have actually contemplated moving to fucking Russia with all of this bullshit going on here. FFS, what a u-turn from the 60's...
Finally a government that isn't pro pedophilia and it's... [double checks notes] Russia?!
http://i.imgur.com/kGH9v2k.jpg
Is that really one of his dogs? I would have figured he would have much larger ones like the Caucasian Ovcharka or Russian Newfoundland.
fuck yes. fucking sickos use that piece of shit site
And all we will hear from the pedo lefties is that the EVIL PUTIN wanted to block Twitter. I could care less if it was Putin or some soccer mom, kiddie porn is wrong.
Hard to argue
Twitter openly blocks conservatives here so why can't they block liberals there? An the CP really Twitter get your shit together.
Man. If Russia observed the natural right to firearms, they'd be beyond appealing as a nation.
Meanwhile, the Clintons and Biden are all, keep it up!
I get that but we spend so much more time focused on foreign leaders and how they are allegedly out to get us when it's our very own who we should be more concerned with ruining this country.
For the good of his people he should either way.
Russia is based. The biggest threat to the globalists plan for worldwide communism are countries that used to be communist or socialist but since then learned the hard way that it does not work and switched to capitalism.
Russian censorship is even worse that what we're experiencing now in the US. Putin's just pissed because he doesn't want to share the power with twitter.
And child porn is always the go-to accusation when you want to vilify someone. Of course I would villify twitter for shitting all over freedom of speech, and actively manipulating the population, but Putin could hardly complain about someone doing that, haha.
And the MSM still has it that it was Russia, Russia, Russia.
Has been China since the USSR was brought down. Right BIll?
Note: That Putin kicked out the Central Bank and banned Soros from entering Russia ever. I would say for that he is a white hat. You might think that he and POTUS Trump are working in unison against the globalists?
RUSSIA!!!!!!!!
Ahh, the old "banned for CP" move. I've heard that it's very effective.
take it down and arrest these scumbags
So Putin good guy now.
Good man that Putin I’m a Russian bot and in no way have I been paid or am. Wing controlled to say this.....
What people still use twitter period is beyond me.