"In other words, there is no support in the statute for plaintiffs to demand that an audit cover the subject of their choosing or to dictate the manner in which an audit is conducted. MCL 168.31a(2) leaves that to the Secretary of State. As a result, plaintiffs have failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted as it concerns Count IV, and this count will be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8)."
But at least it acknowledges that laws were broken, and hopefully they will not be as easy to break again!
Nothing happens now, I guess:
"In other words, there is no support in the statute for plaintiffs to demand that an audit cover the subject of their choosing or to dictate the manner in which an audit is conducted. MCL 168.31a(2) leaves that to the Secretary of State. As a result, plaintiffs have failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted as it concerns Count IV, and this count will be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8)."
But at least it acknowledges that laws were broken, and hopefully they will not be as easy to break again!
Laws were broken without consequence.
There's no way to stop future crimes if the enemy knows they can get away with it even when caught.