This place has become a complete echo chamber unfortunately, as all things inevitably do. Even our side has a significant amount of mouth breathers and we had to know they’d eventually matriculate over to here.
Dude, that was evident leading up to the election and incredibly embarrassingly evident leading up to January.
This place used to have a lot of good rational stuff. But it has turned into an echo chamber of delusion (guys on here saying Biden will never be president as of 1/20 lol), encouraging that stupid stuff on January 6th which was obvious how that was gonna go down, and the gun day/ shit posting stuff. It’s declined.
It is potentially a false dichotomy, but not in this case.
the headline is an oversimplification.
echo chamber/mouth breathers
IQ bell curve/Loud mouth retards <--- this was you.
Your analysis shows less intelligence than the people you mocked for their intelligence.
The information in the article reflects the headline accurately. Hence the "oversimplification" was untrue. The second comment about echo chamber/mouth breathers isn't substantiated as the facts match the headline. The person who made the mouth breather comment has no clue what is going on. Likewise, you chipped in with a wholly inaccurate assessment of retards - when they were correct and you were wrong. Had you read the article and if you had an IQ of 90+, you would have seen the headline was accurate, and would not have made the comment. You could claim that you made the comment for some other reason, but that you did so not realizing how easily it would be refuted, also puts you on the left side of the bell curve.
There are other possibilities of course - such as your grandma was using your computer at the time, that you were being held hostage and forced to type it, that you are actually smart but were stoned out of your gourd at the time etc.
They are unlikely.
We are seeing more of these cases where a parent loses custody of their child/children because of mask issues. This wasn't remotely the first of them. I don't fault you for not being aware of that. I do fault you for assuming that your fellow Pedes are fools because you lack information, and then doubling down on it. Furthermore, your "any large sample group" shows a basic lack of how statistics work. A sample group is meant to be representative of the whole, and needs to be picked randomly in any case. By and large, most people here (excepting shills) support Trump and tend to be better informed than your average American on politics.
It isn't an exact comparison, but you might as well have said "any large Mensa sample group will have a significant number of retards." or "any large sample group of triangles will have a significant number of squares."
This place has become a complete echo chamber unfortunately, as all things inevitably do. Even our side has a significant amount of mouth breathers and we had to know they’d eventually matriculate over to here.
If you had read the article, you would realize your statement is incorrect.
Dude, that was evident leading up to the election and incredibly embarrassingly evident leading up to January.
This place used to have a lot of good rational stuff. But it has turned into an echo chamber of delusion (guys on here saying Biden will never be president as of 1/20 lol), encouraging that stupid stuff on January 6th which was obvious how that was gonna go down, and the gun day/ shit posting stuff. It’s declined.
It's the IQ bell curve. Any large sample group will have a significant sampling of loud mouth retards.
Read the article - the headline is correct. Your statement means you either didn't read the article, or you are on the left side of the bell curve.
Dat false dichotomy.
It is potentially a false dichotomy, but not in this case.
Your analysis shows less intelligence than the people you mocked for their intelligence.
The information in the article reflects the headline accurately. Hence the "oversimplification" was untrue. The second comment about echo chamber/mouth breathers isn't substantiated as the facts match the headline. The person who made the mouth breather comment has no clue what is going on. Likewise, you chipped in with a wholly inaccurate assessment of retards - when they were correct and you were wrong. Had you read the article and if you had an IQ of 90+, you would have seen the headline was accurate, and would not have made the comment. You could claim that you made the comment for some other reason, but that you did so not realizing how easily it would be refuted, also puts you on the left side of the bell curve.
There are other possibilities of course - such as your grandma was using your computer at the time, that you were being held hostage and forced to type it, that you are actually smart but were stoned out of your gourd at the time etc.
They are unlikely.
We are seeing more of these cases where a parent loses custody of their child/children because of mask issues. This wasn't remotely the first of them. I don't fault you for not being aware of that. I do fault you for assuming that your fellow Pedes are fools because you lack information, and then doubling down on it. Furthermore, your "any large sample group" shows a basic lack of how statistics work. A sample group is meant to be representative of the whole, and needs to be picked randomly in any case. By and large, most people here (excepting shills) support Trump and tend to be better informed than your average American on politics.
It isn't an exact comparison, but you might as well have said "any large Mensa sample group will have a significant number of retards." or "any large sample group of triangles will have a significant number of squares."
https://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/broward/fl-ne-covid-family-court-order-20201001-dt65cwe3nrex5ltjwnjkh3ggqu-story.html
https://www.securitylawbrief.com/covid-face-masks-and-parental-custody-rights/
Glad to see there's still some people with intelligence here.