" they had a shared custody agreement where the child split times between the home equally. "
"the father used the notice about the mask situation to request an emergency hearing for full custody — which Justice Matthew F. Cooper granted after berating the already emotionally devastated mother."
"On Tuesday, Dr. Epstein (mother) was not permitted to see, or even speak to, her daughter — even though it was her sixth birthday. To get two supervised visits with her daughter per week, she will need to wear a mask inside her own home."
Once again, if you read the article, the headline is accurate. The judge changed the custody agreement because of the mask issue.
From the cases I have seen brought up, it does seem that the father is often overlooked for custody and the mother assumed to be the better caregiver.
It wasn't the father getting custody - it was that the judge used the mask wearing as the issue to change from joint custody to removing the mother's custody.
I haven't seen any other sources on this story (they all link back to GWP). From the scant information presented in the article, the mask was, at the very least - the straw that broke the camel's back for the judge.
This isn't the first, second or even third such case. They are becoming more common
Headline is accurate -
" they had a shared custody agreement where the child split times between the home equally. "
"the father used the notice about the mask situation to request an emergency hearing for full custody — which Justice Matthew F. Cooper granted after berating the already emotionally devastated mother."
"On Tuesday, Dr. Epstein (mother) was not permitted to see, or even speak to, her daughter — even though it was her sixth birthday. To get two supervised visits with her daughter per week, she will need to wear a mask inside her own home."
Once again, if you read the article, the headline is accurate. The judge changed the custody agreement because of the mask issue.
That's one politically connected father.
Even more so to be penis equipped in ny and win.court in that state is blatantly anti father.
The school also inserted themselves into it by sending letters.
The headline fails to mention that the father received custody. I thought from reading it that the state took the child.
A father taking care of his own daughter is not outrageous to me.
From the cases I have seen brought up, it does seem that the father is often overlooked for custody and the mother assumed to be the better caregiver.
It wasn't the father getting custody - it was that the judge used the mask wearing as the issue to change from joint custody to removing the mother's custody.
Tomaytoes, tomatoes.
I'm talking about the one here on patriots that says it was because of her mask lol
I haven't seen any other sources on this story (they all link back to GWP). From the scant information presented in the article, the mask was, at the very least - the straw that broke the camel's back for the judge.
This isn't the first, second or even third such case. They are becoming more common
https://www.securitylawbrief.com/covid-face-masks-and-parental-custody-rights/