Honestly that's the part that sets off alarm bells for me.
Family Court in NYC sides with the father? There's got to be more to this than what she's letting on, because I have personally seen the family courts award sole custody to a woman that was on meth and unemployed over a father who was a damn fine man, but working a low-paying job.
Apparently the court felt that an unemployed meth-head woman would be a fine mother as long as she got half of what little the father earned, but giving the child to the father so she can benefit from ALL that he earned was unconscionable.
SOMETHING is rotten in this story.
*Edit: Changed plural to singular. Gotta match your cases.
A little clickbaity.
Unacceptable circumstances.
The poor child. Surprised they even got a hearing in the first place. Further surprised a family court sided with the father????????
Honestly that's the part that sets off alarm bells for me.
Family Court in NYC sides with the father? There's got to be more to this than what she's letting on, because I have personally seen the family courts award sole custody to a woman that was on meth and unemployed over a father who was a damn fine man, but working a low-paying job.
Apparently the court felt that an unemployed meth-head woman would be a fine mother as long as she got half of what little the father earned, but giving the child to the father so she can benefit from ALL that he earned was unconscionable.
SOMETHING is rotten in this story.
*Edit: Changed plural to singular. Gotta match your cases.
I'm curious what the fathers side is as well.