64
Comments (21)
sorted by:
6
TexasVet 6 points ago +8 / -2

But they are communist. The fact that you're not willing to put in the effort to demonize Communism again shows that you are a weak-minded fool. Stop playing their word games. Call them what they are.

-2
DebunkTheLeft [S] -2 points ago +2 / -4

Hey look FakeTexasVet is stalking me. This must be when the witching hour when all the "I would rather lose than win" morons come out of their rabbit holes.

1
TexasVet 1 point ago +4 / -3

Funny the only downvote I got was from you loser. Also how dare you accuse me of being a fake veteran without proof. What a despicable thing to do. Not only are you too weak to fight this culture war you have no honor either. Go hang your head in shame son.

-2
DebunkTheLeft [S] -2 points ago +2 / -4

Oh crap, I got hit with the old "I got more upvotes than you" that leftist NAZI Alec Baldwin loves to use. Hey are you gonna insult me for calling him a Nazi instead of a Commie now? Woe is me! Sorry but I don't have photos of McStain and Romney on my nightstand that I kiss before I go to bed every night.

You're calling me weak and at the same time you don't have the IQ to even comprehend the term "adapt and overcome". Pleeeeease. I am thoroughly enjoying destroying you, stalker. Got anything else to say?

5
jstressman 5 points ago +7 / -2

You literally have no clue what the difference is between national socialism and international socialism, which was the #1 fight between the Nazis and the Communists.

Hitler wanted socialism for only his people, ethnic Germans. He wanted to expel everyone else.

The International socialists wanted to abolish borders, open immigration, a global revolution and abolition of the state etc.

They were mortal enemies.

If you can't figure out which side of that is closer to the DSA, then you're retarded.

-2
DebunkTheLeft [S] -2 points ago +2 / -4

So in other words, you're saying National Socialism is good because Hitler wanted socialism for his people. You just described yourself as a Nazi. Fuck off Nazi.

2
jstressman 2 points ago +4 / -2

Let me walk you through it, my mentally challenged friend.

Hitler was still a socialist, but at least he was trying to save his own people by kicking out immigrants and trying to close the border, or even expanding to the east etc... but very ANTI-international.

The point was that the COMMUNISTS actually wanted to abolish borders, abolish the state, and create a global revolution etc...

The DSA is very much in line with the communists, and very much against the anti-internationalist, very nationalist, purely focused on the preservation of his own ethnic group, Nazis.

The OP made a retarded point. I was correcting it.

You then made an even more retarded point because you apparently couldn't understand any of the points made yet.

You fucking moron.

Hitler might have still been a socialist, but he was less bad than the communists. That doesn't mean I'm a Nazi or want to be a Nazi, or think that National Socialism is even necessarily a good thing. It's just better than Communism, and the DSA SURE AS FUCK AREN'T THE SAME AS NAZIS when they are EXACTLY the same as COMMUNISTS.

Some part of that you can't wrap your empty head around with all that spare room you've got in it?

-2
DebunkTheLeft [S] -2 points ago +2 / -4

LOL in your first statement you say "Hitler wanted socialism for only his people, ethnic Germans", then in your second post you say "Hitler might have still been a socialist, but he was less bad than the communists".

Shit, I don't even have to think of an argument because you just walked back what you said, just like a typical leftist NAZI. HILARIOUS!

I don't know if you're a Fed or a dumbass, or both, but you might want to try harder.

I would write more, but it's just boring now. Refer to my response to FakeTexasVet above. It applies to you too.

2
jstressman 2 points ago +3 / -1

Rape is less bad than murder.

Rape is still horrible.

But would you rather be raped, or murdered?

Sinking in to that empty skull yet?

1
Toobin247 1 point ago +2 / -1

I was with you kinda until this analogy. They were all bad. One murderer isn’t better because he murdered less. That’s what it really is. Socialism is a vehicle for communism and it’s all bad. People are comparing what’s going on now with both communism and nazism and that’s because their so closely related it’s hard to separate them when you actually dig in and look at it. It’s all the same shit with a different veneer. Just because one was more successful at killing and subjugation doesn’t make the other one better or less harmful.

-2
jstressman -2 points ago +1 / -3

One kills my family. The other tries to defend it.

Whether or not they're both ultimately failures in the end, if I have to choose the lesser of two evils it's going to be the one that tries to save my family rather than destroy it.

Oversimplifying beyond that to make your argument easier isn't really productive or accurate.

1
Toobin247 1 point ago +2 / -1

I’m not oversimplifying. Everyone is equally miserable under authoritarian rule. The Nazis targeted non Jews and any enemy of the state as well. Arguing that nazism would fight to protect your family and is “less evil” is a dishonest argument and shows lack of understanding when it comes to history.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +4 / -5
-1
Toobin247 -1 points ago +3 / -4

That’s where you’re wrong kiddo. The left always eat their own. And Hitler was a leftist. Anyone who argues otherwise is dishonest and ignoring a large chunk of history.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
0
Toobin247 0 points ago +1 / -1

Fake and gay. No it doesn’t transcend a damn thing. It your head wasn’t up your ass and you actually knew history and how the ideologies formed you’d know it was on the left. Read a book. A real one. Not some Hitler youth fantasy novel. Asswipe.

-4
DebunkTheLeft [S] -4 points ago +1 / -5

You mean destroying the German people was not wrong? Damn you Nazis are really offended by me calling you Nazis.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
0
Toobin247 0 points ago +1 / -1

“Authoritarian good”. Lol.