You could say the same about cucked men. I have had lengthy discussions with men and women who made their 2016 decision about Trump based on the "grab 'em by the p***y" statement. Those libs were completely emotional and brainwashed by MSM. I voted for Trump 2x in 2016, Primary and Election.
I think a lot of cucked men are just playing a role in submission to women. These are dudes who have basically already accepted matriarchal rule and have decided “it is time to step back and let women lead”. So they are going along with the nonsense, knowing it is nonsense, because I guess they believe these are just growing pains or hiccups of the switch from a world led by men to a world led by women. Anyway, I think that is how they rationalize it.
But get these cucked men alone, around other men, and a lot of their cuckiness starts to evaporate. Suddenly they are willing to admit that a supermodel is more attractive to them than an obese mentally ill homeless woman. Suddenly they are willing to admit that sucking on a tranny’s cock would feel gay to them. Suddenly they remember that Mexico is under the thumb of drug cartels because they saw it in a Hollywood action movie they watched after their polyamorous life partner fell asleep.
So it does seem to me that these cucks are submitting partially as a strategic move. They see that women are taking over and we are moving into a world of nonsense female logic and are just getting a head start joining in. A guy like Ricky Gervais for example. He knows a plumber in a dress isn’t a real woman, but he also has to submit to the redefinition of sex/gender as separate and subjective or else he gets cancelled from society. So he submits. But if women never had that power in the first place, would the cucks still be making the same cost-benefit analysis on their submission. If nobody even thought to separate sex and gender, would the average cuck have come up with it on their own? I don’t think so. The cuck is not proactive, the cuck only follows.
Human nature is to usurp authority. We see it in politics every day. We have record of it with Adam and Eve. Wives without God in their lives will usurp their husband's authority. Employees with their employers. We have record of Satan trying to usurp the authority of God in Heaven. Knowing your role as a man in a marriage depends on your Biblical literacy. We live in a Biblically illiterate age because the love of the knowledge of evil has blinded our ungodly citizens. Their minds are corrupted. Men need to take their place and they need to keep their power.
What about the modest, conservative, strong, independent and God fearing women out there? Not all women are "emotional and weak." We don't all "vote left constantly." Some of us are actually patriots, and we are willing to face persecution and slander if it means speaking the truth.
How about those men who don't have the balls to defend their unborn children from abortion, or those who just stand by in silence as men pretending to be women demand to go into girls' changerooms, possibly endangering peoples' wives or daughters?
Tell me, what about those men (even young men) who turn to porn to fulfill their sexual desires because they 'don't have anything better to do'?(These types of men seem to be VERY EMOTIONAL and easily manipulated because of those emotions)
Should these "men" have a right to vote? They don't seem very strong, or responsible. They seem very weak willed and pathetic.
Both sexes have competent and incompetent people. Both sexes have more than their share of snowflakes, so don't say that all women are "easily manipulated" or "weak" or "emotional". If all you can do is generalize people, you are no better than the left.
No offense to ya sweety, but the incessant need to point out that exceptions to the rules exist doesn't help us any.
i.e. Everyone: Men are stronger then women.
Liberal: Rhonda Rousey could kick Urkel's ass.
We don't decide things based on the exceptions to the rule. At least we shouldn't.
If some people get left out of the vote that should that is unfortunate but still miles better then letting a throng of people ruled by their emotions control it.
Doing that is why we have boys going into girls change rooms right now.
There's a variety of types of people of both sexes, though different distributions and likelihoods.
On the subject of porn: it's not for "considering women objects" - nobody considers women objects except that psychopath on Silence of the Lambs. Porn is an escape from the sad situation that average-looking men fall into in recent decades due to unrealiatic standards women have, largely resulting from the obesity pandemic, where the only women who are willing to get into a relationship with an average-looking guy are extremely unattractive and unhealthy, and so average-looking guys go to make-believe land where they can be loved by someone who isn't repulsive-looking.
Either way, porn is a vice. And while we should help people overcome this addiction, it is a horrible thing, and should not be encouraged.
However, the focus of my comment is not about porn.
In reply to Fenuuk's initial comment, I was simply stating that there are people of BOTH SEXES who might lack the responsibility and competence necessary for voting, therefore women alone shouldn't be generalized as unfit to vote.
There are highly intelligent women out there, and manipulated radical feminists, just like how there are many strong, competent men, but also cowardly snowflakes.
There are generalities and then there are exceptions to the rule. We acknowledge the exceptions but also understand the generality still holds true. There are breakdowns of voting patterns by demographic that show how men and women vote. If only men voted, the country would be in a much better place because we would still be in a patriarchy. Instead we have handed power over to women and women now rule society. The irrational logic of women, the impulses of women, the delusions of women, the vices of women - all are being praised, accepted, accomodated, and promoted. And in just a few years society has all but collapsed into this obscene clown world wasteland. We are falling in the same way and for the same reasons that matriarchies, in every country, in every culture, in every era, have failed.
The other problem with handing your country over to women is even if the women are somehow successful and don’t destroy it on their own, then you still have three foreign countries/powers: Russia, China, and Islam, where women hold essentially zero power. And those countries, led by men, will have the tenacity of men, the aggression of men, the logic of men, the cunning of men, the violence of men, the anger of men, all pushing them forward to dominate. As we, under the rule of women, teach our boys to wear dresses and put our soldiers in high heels, these countries, under the rule of men, build strong steel for military weaponry, raise bloodthirsty soldiers, and plan out attacks over the course of decades. And when these countries of men decide to lay waste to the countries of women, we will be sitting ducks. Our high-heeled pregnant tranny soldiers will be fucking obliterated by actual males trained in combat based on thousands of years of warfare history. Meanwhile our armies read something about gender fluidity written in a textbook from 2015 and that’s our new official military policy. And then what? The conquering men wipe out the cucks of the matriarchy and take ALL of you ladies as sex slaves. Or at least the pretty ones. The ugly ones get the bullet too. And then none of you will be voting anyway, so it’s like: which way, western woman? Continue the feminist delusion or wake up to reality?
i understand and you do have a point but i feel that to many weak people have the vote my wife is a very cleaver and based woman . more women are on the left then the men and they are easily manipulated . maybe the vote should be restricted to veterans or iq test or land owners but at the moment its not fucking working cos some jogger bitch will cheat us and you know it
A lot of women kneejerk assume this idea is being floated because we “hate women” or “don’t respect them”. That’s really not it. First of all, most men who even float this idea theoretically wouldn’t have even considered it 20 years ago. So part of this is just how men’s minds work. Remember, we have the ability to compartmentalize our emotions and think “outside of them”, if that makes sense. So we have the same emotional programming as women and cucks that says, “My God, of course women must vote!!!” But for men, we feel that, then compartmentalize it. Then we look at the situation logically. And what do we see? We see enormous international superpowers, under the control of men, building up huge militaries against us. Russia, China, Islam. And we see that they have decided to target our western women as our Achilles Heel to destroy our nations. And we see that it is working. So now what? Just... accept it? Or do we try to counteract this tactic? And do women understand that we have these thoughts because we are trying to PROTECT women, not suppress them? Do women understand that as men, we see more clearly than them what OTHER men in these other nations are doing and how they have weaponized women’s worst impulses against us?
And I am not even necessarily saying we should strip women of the vote here either. First of all that is highly unlikely so it’s probably a waste of time to even pursue. But as a based woman, you should at least be able to step back a little and look at what is going on here. Just even something like trying to introduce emotional subjectivity into codified law, and the chaos and illogic it is causing. I understand why a woman might feel that introducing more emotion into law seems like a good thing, but it hasn’t been thought through because eventually and inevitably two subjective emotional states will come into conflict, and then what? Without objective legal standards, judges are just making arbitrary decisions based on how they feel that day. The whole system stops working.
I respectfully disagree. Men & women alike can be stupid as heck. There were plenty of Democrats far before women voted & pulled our country into Civil War, insisting slavery was a God-given right. You didn't think your opinion through very carefully.
giveing women the vote was the biggest mistake ever made they are emotional and weak they vote left constantly and are easily manipulated
You could say the same about cucked men. I have had lengthy discussions with men and women who made their 2016 decision about Trump based on the "grab 'em by the p***y" statement. Those libs were completely emotional and brainwashed by MSM. I voted for Trump 2x in 2016, Primary and Election.
I think a lot of cucked men are just playing a role in submission to women. These are dudes who have basically already accepted matriarchal rule and have decided “it is time to step back and let women lead”. So they are going along with the nonsense, knowing it is nonsense, because I guess they believe these are just growing pains or hiccups of the switch from a world led by men to a world led by women. Anyway, I think that is how they rationalize it.
But get these cucked men alone, around other men, and a lot of their cuckiness starts to evaporate. Suddenly they are willing to admit that a supermodel is more attractive to them than an obese mentally ill homeless woman. Suddenly they are willing to admit that sucking on a tranny’s cock would feel gay to them. Suddenly they remember that Mexico is under the thumb of drug cartels because they saw it in a Hollywood action movie they watched after their polyamorous life partner fell asleep.
So it does seem to me that these cucks are submitting partially as a strategic move. They see that women are taking over and we are moving into a world of nonsense female logic and are just getting a head start joining in. A guy like Ricky Gervais for example. He knows a plumber in a dress isn’t a real woman, but he also has to submit to the redefinition of sex/gender as separate and subjective or else he gets cancelled from society. So he submits. But if women never had that power in the first place, would the cucks still be making the same cost-benefit analysis on their submission. If nobody even thought to separate sex and gender, would the average cuck have come up with it on their own? I don’t think so. The cuck is not proactive, the cuck only follows.
Human nature is to usurp authority. We see it in politics every day. We have record of it with Adam and Eve. Wives without God in their lives will usurp their husband's authority. Employees with their employers. We have record of Satan trying to usurp the authority of God in Heaven. Knowing your role as a man in a marriage depends on your Biblical literacy. We live in a Biblically illiterate age because the love of the knowledge of evil has blinded our ungodly citizens. Their minds are corrupted. Men need to take their place and they need to keep their power.
very true same with the fags they should not get the vote
What about the modest, conservative, strong, independent and God fearing women out there? Not all women are "emotional and weak." We don't all "vote left constantly." Some of us are actually patriots, and we are willing to face persecution and slander if it means speaking the truth.
How about those men who don't have the balls to defend their unborn children from abortion, or those who just stand by in silence as men pretending to be women demand to go into girls' changerooms, possibly endangering peoples' wives or daughters?
Tell me, what about those men (even young men) who turn to porn to fulfill their sexual desires because they 'don't have anything better to do'?(These types of men seem to be VERY EMOTIONAL and easily manipulated because of those emotions)
Should these "men" have a right to vote? They don't seem very strong, or responsible. They seem very weak willed and pathetic.
Both sexes have competent and incompetent people. Both sexes have more than their share of snowflakes, so don't say that all women are "easily manipulated" or "weak" or "emotional". If all you can do is generalize people, you are no better than the left.
No offense to ya sweety, but the incessant need to point out that exceptions to the rules exist doesn't help us any.
i.e. Everyone: Men are stronger then women. Liberal: Rhonda Rousey could kick Urkel's ass.
We don't decide things based on the exceptions to the rule. At least we shouldn't. If some people get left out of the vote that should that is unfortunate but still miles better then letting a throng of people ruled by their emotions control it. Doing that is why we have boys going into girls change rooms right now.
There's a variety of types of people of both sexes, though different distributions and likelihoods.
On the subject of porn: it's not for "considering women objects" - nobody considers women objects except that psychopath on Silence of the Lambs. Porn is an escape from the sad situation that average-looking men fall into in recent decades due to unrealiatic standards women have, largely resulting from the obesity pandemic, where the only women who are willing to get into a relationship with an average-looking guy are extremely unattractive and unhealthy, and so average-looking guys go to make-believe land where they can be loved by someone who isn't repulsive-looking.
https://www.ketovangelist.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/US-Adult-Obesity-1960-2010.png
https://miro.medium.com/max/2048/1*iC0UjKDxFViE3XZuk6MMUw.jpeg
https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/are-todays-women-too-picky-for-their-own-good/
https://www.yourtango.com/2016285828/women-find-80-percent-men-unattractive-says-crazy-study
Either way, porn is a vice. And while we should help people overcome this addiction, it is a horrible thing, and should not be encouraged.
However, the focus of my comment is not about porn.
In reply to Fenuuk's initial comment, I was simply stating that there are people of BOTH SEXES who might lack the responsibility and competence necessary for voting, therefore women alone shouldn't be generalized as unfit to vote.
There are highly intelligent women out there, and manipulated radical feminists, just like how there are many strong, competent men, but also cowardly snowflakes.
There are generalities and then there are exceptions to the rule. We acknowledge the exceptions but also understand the generality still holds true. There are breakdowns of voting patterns by demographic that show how men and women vote. If only men voted, the country would be in a much better place because we would still be in a patriarchy. Instead we have handed power over to women and women now rule society. The irrational logic of women, the impulses of women, the delusions of women, the vices of women - all are being praised, accepted, accomodated, and promoted. And in just a few years society has all but collapsed into this obscene clown world wasteland. We are falling in the same way and for the same reasons that matriarchies, in every country, in every culture, in every era, have failed.
The other problem with handing your country over to women is even if the women are somehow successful and don’t destroy it on their own, then you still have three foreign countries/powers: Russia, China, and Islam, where women hold essentially zero power. And those countries, led by men, will have the tenacity of men, the aggression of men, the logic of men, the cunning of men, the violence of men, the anger of men, all pushing them forward to dominate. As we, under the rule of women, teach our boys to wear dresses and put our soldiers in high heels, these countries, under the rule of men, build strong steel for military weaponry, raise bloodthirsty soldiers, and plan out attacks over the course of decades. And when these countries of men decide to lay waste to the countries of women, we will be sitting ducks. Our high-heeled pregnant tranny soldiers will be fucking obliterated by actual males trained in combat based on thousands of years of warfare history. Meanwhile our armies read something about gender fluidity written in a textbook from 2015 and that’s our new official military policy. And then what? The conquering men wipe out the cucks of the matriarchy and take ALL of you ladies as sex slaves. Or at least the pretty ones. The ugly ones get the bullet too. And then none of you will be voting anyway, so it’s like: which way, western woman? Continue the feminist delusion or wake up to reality?
i understand and you do have a point but i feel that to many weak people have the vote my wife is a very cleaver and based woman . more women are on the left then the men and they are easily manipulated . maybe the vote should be restricted to veterans or iq test or land owners but at the moment its not fucking working cos some jogger bitch will cheat us and you know it
A lot of women kneejerk assume this idea is being floated because we “hate women” or “don’t respect them”. That’s really not it. First of all, most men who even float this idea theoretically wouldn’t have even considered it 20 years ago. So part of this is just how men’s minds work. Remember, we have the ability to compartmentalize our emotions and think “outside of them”, if that makes sense. So we have the same emotional programming as women and cucks that says, “My God, of course women must vote!!!” But for men, we feel that, then compartmentalize it. Then we look at the situation logically. And what do we see? We see enormous international superpowers, under the control of men, building up huge militaries against us. Russia, China, Islam. And we see that they have decided to target our western women as our Achilles Heel to destroy our nations. And we see that it is working. So now what? Just... accept it? Or do we try to counteract this tactic? And do women understand that we have these thoughts because we are trying to PROTECT women, not suppress them? Do women understand that as men, we see more clearly than them what OTHER men in these other nations are doing and how they have weaponized women’s worst impulses against us?
And I am not even necessarily saying we should strip women of the vote here either. First of all that is highly unlikely so it’s probably a waste of time to even pursue. But as a based woman, you should at least be able to step back a little and look at what is going on here. Just even something like trying to introduce emotional subjectivity into codified law, and the chaos and illogic it is causing. I understand why a woman might feel that introducing more emotion into law seems like a good thing, but it hasn’t been thought through because eventually and inevitably two subjective emotional states will come into conflict, and then what? Without objective legal standards, judges are just making arbitrary decisions based on how they feel that day. The whole system stops working.
you get it bro
I respectfully disagree. Men & women alike can be stupid as heck. There were plenty of Democrats far before women voted & pulled our country into Civil War, insisting slavery was a God-given right. You didn't think your opinion through very carefully.
again read more my edgy argument was to say that 1 vote per family man woman child 1 vote