A lot of women kneejerk assume this idea is being floated because we “hate women” or “don’t respect them”. That’s really not it. First of all, most men who even float this idea theoretically wouldn’t have even considered it 20 years ago. So part of this is just how men’s minds work. Remember, we have the ability to compartmentalize our emotions and think “outside of them”, if that makes sense. So we have the same emotional programming as women and cucks that says, “My God, of course women must vote!!!” But for men, we feel that, then compartmentalize it. Then we look at the situation logically. And what do we see? We see enormous international superpowers, under the control of men, building up huge militaries against us. Russia, China, Islam. And we see that they have decided to target our western women as our Achilles Heel to destroy our nations. And we see that it is working. So now what? Just... accept it? Or do we try to counteract this tactic? And do women understand that we have these thoughts because we are trying to PROTECT women, not suppress them? Do women understand that as men, we see more clearly than them what OTHER men in these other nations are doing and how they have weaponized women’s worst impulses against us?
And I am not even necessarily saying we should strip women of the vote here either. First of all that is highly unlikely so it’s probably a waste of time to even pursue. But as a based woman, you should at least be able to step back a little and look at what is going on here. Just even something like trying to introduce emotional subjectivity into codified law, and the chaos and illogic it is causing. I understand why a woman might feel that introducing more emotion into law seems like a good thing, but it hasn’t been thought through because eventually and inevitably two subjective emotional states will come into conflict, and then what? Without objective legal standards, judges are just making arbitrary decisions based on how they feel that day. The whole system stops working.
A lot of women kneejerk assume this idea is being floated because we “hate women” or “don’t respect them”. That’s really not it. First of all, most men who even float this idea theoretically wouldn’t have even considered it 20 years ago. So part of this is just how men’s minds work. Remember, we have the ability to compartmentalize our emotions and think “outside of them”, if that makes sense. So we have the same emotional programming as women and cucks that says, “My God, of course women must vote!!!” But for men, we feel that, then compartmentalize it. Then we look at the situation logically. And what do we see? We see enormous international superpowers, under the control of men, building up huge militaries against us. Russia, China, Islam. And we see that they have decided to target our western women as our Achilles Heel to destroy our nations. And we see that it is working. So now what? Just... accept it? Or do we try to counteract this tactic? And do women understand that we have these thoughts because we are trying to PROTECT women, not suppress them? Do women understand that as men, we see more clearly than them what OTHER men in these other nations are doing and how they have weaponized women’s worst impulses against us?
And I am not even necessarily saying we should strip women of the vote here either. First of all that is highly unlikely so it’s probably a waste of time to even pursue. But as a based woman, you should at least be able to step back a little and look at what is going on here. Just even something like trying to introduce emotional subjectivity into codified law, and the chaos and illogic it is causing. I understand why a woman might feel that introducing more emotion into law seems like a good thing, but it hasn’t been thought through because eventually and inevitably two subjective emotional states will come into conflict, and then what? Without objective legal standards, judges are just making arbitrary decisions based on how they feel that day. The whole system stops working.
you get it bro