They are gaslighting. And perhaps they made it so obvious intentionally. It's the Soviet tactic of forcing people to repeat things they KNOW are lies. It is to break the human spirit through humiliation and intimidation. And it works on just under half the population.
There have been a number of psychology experiments where the researchers will do things like place two identical objects (A & B) on a table. Then they'll have many people in a room, different ratios of controlled and uncontrolled.
Which object is bigger? With the controlled members all saying "B is bigger" and then seeing how the uncontrolled members respond.
These have been done with increasingly ridiculous situations, where it's clear the controlled members are just ridiculous, buy the group mentality still tends to win over most people.
Look how many people will say that a man, in a dress, is actually a woman. Then they'll say toxic masculinity is must end the male abuse of women, then they'll watch a man shatter a woman's skull in a pay-per-view fight and celebrate how progressive it is.
"What I didn't put in the report was that at the end he gave me a choice – between a life of comfort or more torture. All I had to do was to say that I could see five lights when, in fact, there were only four."
"You didn't say it?"
"No! No. But I was going to. I would have told him anything. Anything at all! But more than that, I believed that I could see five lights."
All I know is that I never heard, read or watched on the media so many damn ‘fact checks’ this, fact check that, fact check out he wazoo, until around late 2015-2016. Hmmm wonder what changed.
Ya I was going to say this is a very famous (like day 2 or 3 in almost all psych 101 classes, after the Stanford prison experiment and the electric shock test) and is widely replicated. The Asch conformity study is the most famous. These three studies tell you all you need to know about totalitarianism and the nature of most people.
For those who dont know, the stanford prison experiment was a bunch of people role playing a prison. They had to stop it because the "guards" were beating the inmates after a few days.
The electric shock study had participants administer shocks to another "subject" when they answered a question wrong. The second subject (the one getting the shocks) was really a researcher or recording who'd scream in agony and beg them to stop, but there would be another researcher telling the subject administering the shocks to keep going. Every time they shocked they increased the voltage. They wanted to see how far people would go when an official figure (researcher) told them to. Almost everyone kept going past the point where the "shockee" complained of heart problems and even stopped responding. It is actually terrifying.
Another interesting study, the dark room study. They put random people (girls and guys) in a locked room that was totally 100% dark.. but they had night vision cams to watch them.
In almost every group people started hooking up... random people who didn't know eachother and couldn't see eachother in a dark room full of strangers.
The stanford experiment is absolute evidence why the military and cop trusters are fools. Normal people were "just following orders," imagine what a massive group of people who were specifically trained to "just follow orders" will do when (not if but WHEN) turned on us.
Couldn't agree more. Now these people are random Joes, in fact a rule of thumb when you're talking about psychological experimentation is a lot of the subjects are college students bc they're an easy place to get participants from.
They haven't had years of "respect the chain of command!" .. "never question a superior officer!" .. etc beat into their Operating System. If normal people will follow a random researchers encouragement (they never ordered, they just said "it is imperative to the study that you continue") to the point where they're shocking the body of an unresponsive dude who complained of heart complications imagine what soldiers would do when commanded by their superior officer. It's scary.
It has also played out over and over again throughout the history of the world. People think we're somehow fundamentally different than those that came before us. I think they'll be suprised.
College students do get some of this though. They’re essentially conditioned to think that professors, researchers, etc are their intellectual superiors. So in this situation there is a sort of implied chain of command.
I dunno how bad things got in the army after I got out, but the soldiers I worked with wouldn't do that shit even if we were ordered to. We had an extremely low tolerance for bullshit and if something was wrong we had no issues making that clear. We'd do stupid busywork and other nonsense if told to, yes, but something that is obviously an unlawful order on the of it? It wasn't going to happen.
Any group with power over a second group, and the subordinate group has no means of self defence (like firearms), and when there is no impartial third group properly regulating the empowered first group when arming the second group would be impossible in those rare cases like a prison population.
I don’t know why you’re getting downvoted. I mean the experiments aren’t invalid but I know what you’re talking about. It’s related to this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empathising%E2%80%93systemising_theory (notice all the tabula rasa nonsense on there about “muh sexism”)
Measured by how many fake votes they seem to need. I think that number has actually gone up over the last 8 years. They're losing, but now moving onto more "hard" fascism to get the upper hand. No more need for pesky votes.
At this point, the only moral factor left in our situation is whether or not we are going to allow these abusers to continue to hurt us, our homes, our future, our children and our children's future.
By now it is nothing less than morally imperative that we eliminate the abusers by any means necessary.
Any. Means. Necessary.
It is morally reprehensible for us to sit around and allow these sick freaks free reign to abuse and destroy everything they want.
Both are collectivist philosophies so the distinction is irrelevant for the purpose of this argument. Both systems place the collective need higher than individual liberty and neither system allowed other political viewpoints to be represented.
The purpose of the argument was about fake voting, collectivism has nothing to do with that. Communism is the one that deceitfully presents itself as a populist ideology carrying out the will of the people, hence calling their countries republics and holding "elections" even when there's only one candidate allowed.
Fascism doesn't pretend to be democratic in the slightest.
In fascism, someone "owns" a company, but government beaurocrats decide how he should run it, and government taxes him as much as they like to take all the profits.
In Communism, someone "runs" a company that the government owns, but government beaurocrats decide how he should run it and the government takes all the profits since they own it.
Different words but same idea: total government control where people are all basically slaves.
In fascism, someone "owns" a company, but government beaurocrats decide how he should run it, and government taxes him as much as they like to take all the profits.
Do you have any examples for this, or somewhere to read more?
They are gaslighting. And perhaps they made it so obvious intentionally. It's the Soviet tactic of forcing people to repeat things they KNOW are lies. It is to break the human spirit through humiliation and intimidation. And it works on just under half the population.
Correct. They are methodically, deliberately getting people to accept lies about things they witness with their own eyes.
Cf. "there was no election fraud" when everyone with functioning eyes saw the blatant fraud perpetrated for hours on TV
This is mind control at its finest. Look you right in the eye and state the opposite of reality. Stick to it long enough, and the masses will eventually relent and accept the twisted view of reality. It works FLAWLESSLY, with 100% predictable precision. They own the minds of the masses of this planet outright.
The hand is drawn over the microphone that is supposed to be closer to the camera - that's not a friggin optical illusion, and if it's a technical glitch, it's a glitch in whatever fuckery they were up to. It seems the goal is exactly that - "what do you mean Old Joe is overlaid on the frame, that's just your eyes playing tricks on you."
Correct. It is literally impossible for that shot to be an "optical illusion", and can only be possible with editing of some sort. They fucked up, and the press is 100% covering for them. This is a classic liberal "Who you gonna believe, me or your lying eyes" case.
The "press" was likely in on the fuckery themselves. It will be interesting to see how long they are willing and able to keep up the charade that Biden is making any decisions, establishing policies, or has any real involvement in this regime besides being trotted out occasionally to give completely scripted, prerecorded, rehearsed, and heavily edited statements.
I would believe the people who did this were given approval by the White House. I think they were trying to make it look like he was right next to the press, but he was a lot further away, which you can see in the second video from another angle. Because his avoidance of people is starting to be a meme.
Whoever edited that video was incompetent. Which is why it's being discussed. Because the dementia patient can't even take a casual question from the press without it being completely staged.
There would be no reason to isolate him if you wanted to make him seem closer. You would simply isolate the mics and zoom the rest of the video in. I’ve done some rotoscoping & green screen and I honestly can’t explain why his in focus hand would appear in front of a blurry microphone. If it happened live his hand would blur as it got too close to the camera. It’s weird. I didn’t believe all the empty White House conspiracy theories but I’m starting to wonder.
Yeah. It definitely looks poorly done. I re-watched some videos of Trump talking to reporters outside of White House. During the Trump videos the background noise was super loud (I assume from Marine 1), Trump had to yell his answers. Also, in the Trump videos the mics moved around a lot more in & out of frame & you could barely hear the questions. Whereas in the Biden video you can clearly hear the questions and the mics barely move. It’s odd.
They got caught and are trying to cover it up, also when did blue check marks on Twitter become the final word on things "did not bother blue tick Twitter users", so if it doesn't bother them then it must be fine, huh!?! Aren't they just people like everyone else except might be famous, what makes them the end all be all of things
The only people left on Twitter are the ones they've decided will repeat that 2+2=5, math is racist, those suitcases of ballots were perfectly normal and legal, and Trump insulted Japan by feeding fish. The ones they kicked off aren't having this shit.
Either they got caught and are now trying to cover it up... or worse, they did this on purpose so that when they do more of it they've got the narrative of "don't listen to the insane conspiracy theorists, we already 'proved' they're wrong, Biden is totes alive, promise"
Agree, this media message conditions people to ridicule the idea of manipulated video and stay in the safe "majority" opinion, e.g. "the incident did not trouble too many". And yeah, the actual video seems so blatant, it could well have been on purpose, for one reason or another.
The Lugenpresse is a racial problem, not a news industry problem. One ethno-religion is instructed as youths to enter positions of power, and control the distribution of knowledge. They are racial supremacists, and responsible for 99% of television's racist jokes since 1960. They'll insult everyone else freely, but you'll be insta-cancelled if you criticize them.
Oh FFS! They are going to twist this just like the ballot suitcases and then call it fact checked.
This doesn't appear to be a green screen. It's possible, but after years of editing what jumps out to me here is that it is a layered video. At least three layers deep. They've used a masked/clipped layer to cut in the mic and then re-layer over his hands.
Most people think of editing as cutting different angles and clips together (jumping around in time) but there is the other type of editing where you layer multiple video files on top of one another to create a scene that didn't actually take place. That layering is what we see here.
So, really, why? What reason would they have for doing this? Best I can figure is that he is so incompetent (dementia) that he can't be trusted to give an interview without royally messing it up. They filmed him walking over to his handler with que cards or a teleprompter, read his script, and then cut in the audio and video of a reporter(s) afterwards.
Also, this editing is offensively bad. I could have done better with decade old equipment in my first year of editing. Like, can they not afford someone at least mildly competent at producing their propaganda? If they lie about this, what the hell are we supposed to trust?
My thoughts exactly. It appears to be a poorly edited composited video and the only reason I can think of as to why it's done so badly is because it was rushed. That or it's been done purposely bad to see how far they can fool the general public, which if recent years has proven anything, they'll believe anything.
1) Why would you mask and layer a shot where all the elements are already there? You wouldn't. So that means some element was missing.
What was missing? What needed to be added or moved? Was it:
Scenario A) The mics were added (unlikely)
In which case just paste them in on top and be done with it. Biden is intended to be behind them at all times so there's literally no point to have him masked... yet he clearly is masked! He can't go over those mics without being masked!
Scenario B) Biden was added (makes way more sense)
If Biden was the missing element, it makes sense for him to be masked, and that obviously means green screen. It explains why you'd even bother with this in this shot in the first place.
2) Why would your news team selectively edit in shit, like mics, which takes time, in a trivial interview that makes no difference either way, only to have your competitor run their unedited shot 30 minutes earlier with no mics and leave viewers like, wtf, why did this one group add mics in post that's fucking weird. Just run the clip of Biden.
So no, they did not film Biden faking an interview ON LOCATION then add reporters after. They filmed Biden OFF LOCATION then added him to the location with or without reporters.
Good points. I have no idea why they would do this. Its possible they did a triple layer but literally none of these scenarios make an sense at all. If he is on a green screen it is a hell of a lot of work to get it to match the perspective, angles, lighting, etc. It would be so much easier to just have him act out a presser and then paste in the mics. If so, then there is zero reason (except incompetence) to make a third layer of his arm.
They stole a presidential election on live television and left a mountain of evidence higher than the f#cking Tower of Babel, then said it was the most secure election in world history.
I'm surprised they even bothered to answer the questions about the glitch.
Also, the blue checktards would eat their own shyte if the Globocommiecrats told them to.
Also, the blue checktards would eat their own shyte if the Globocommiecrats told them to.
Fact. The pedo satanists often make their child victims eat their own feces to degrade them further, while torturing them. "See? You're eating your own shit, you ARE shit, all you'll ever be is a bag of soft warm shit to fuck. You deserve this and more, and you're gonna get it."
That's how they're treating innocent, defenseless children, while the rest of us sit here and wonder when will this nightmare WE'RE going through ever end. When can it be stopped. When! Is whenfagging the same as datefagging? If it is, sorry
Plus, they know the left and right will fight over this obviously doctored video right down party lines. They want conflict to escalate. It's more provocation, just like the constant leftist rioting and the mask mandates.
Nothing that happens with these neomarxists is harmless. Stay vigilant.
If you wanna be among the "in" crowd, the cool kids with the fake blue CHECKMARK,....then you gotta disbelieve what your own eyes are telling you, and believe what your peer group wants you to believe.
I find it odd that those two mics are exceptionally visible in all other media, particularly the stills. Photographers aren't that sloppy. How many photographers can take the effort to make sure those two mics are in their still shot? Now I do sound completely nuts, but it seems convenient those two mics are all over the stills, as to suggest, see, they're there.
It would be virtually impossible to combine the elements present in this video. The camera movement would have to be motion controlled on Biden, the BG, and the reporters at the end.
Yeah. I don’t know how much experience the person you are communicating with has, but the shit that can be faked at this point is endless. It is hard to do...well. But yes, you can change perspective over time now with After Effects and have it match cameras from different sources that have different variables. Hell, it’s what most of the latest tutorials for After Effects are about. I just went through a bunch.
Not when the fucking camera is panning, tilting and zooming in and out. If all these elements were shot separately, you need to know everything from the distance of the subject to the lens, the height of the lens, the lens length, which are all changing in the shot, and have a motion control rig to perfectly repeat each action for each pass, or else the change in perspective would make everything look like it's sliding around independently and warping. You can't just take a bunch of elements and fit it all together in post without very careful consideration of all those elements. I have a diploma in film production; I know what can be achieved convincingly and what it would take to do so. So you can miss me with your "whatever you want" bullshit.
Edit:
Oh look! Here's a picture of Trump with the press showing how close the mics get to the subject:
Forgetting about Biden's hands for a second, It would be impossible to combine all the other elements in the scene and have it be consistent and believable due to the variation of things like subject to camera distance, changing the lens length and shot composition. Not to mention doing all that with two different cameras as we can see footage from both WaPo and The Hill.
The reason people are confused is because they think the mics are smaller than they are and closer to the camera than they are. This is because shooting on a long lens flattens the image and makes it difficult to determine the distances of elements in the scene.So if the image is flattened and the mic is actually bigger than one might think, it would look like the mic is between the camera and his hands when it is really between Biden and his hands, which can be confirmed in the WaPo footage.
Anybody trying to tell you it can be done in After Effects doesn't know the complications involved in doing everything BUT Biden's "hand glitch" to make it look convincing.
It is a trick of perspective caused by a lens probably between 50mm and 70mm.
Yeah I see it now from that second angle you posted. That amount of compression has to be higher than 70 or my experience with full frame slr does not apply.
Yeah I think you're right. Although I might be technically correct because Cine/news cameras are usually Super 35, so 50-70mm lens would have the FoV of an 80-120mm FF, I was estimating in terms of full frame. To me it looks to be approaching normal width by the time he stops walking, but if I were to put money on it, I'd say around 70-85mm FF. 100mm seems high, but I could be wrong.
Most of the stuff you are describing, especially the movement, is done by shooting a wide wide shot, then moving and bobbing the zoomed in portion. It looks like it is being hand held, but it's static and you are only seeing the smaller frame shaking. Is that not possible?
I've watched about 50 videos of people doing that, but maybe it's different somehow here.
Its absolutely impossible for a object to appear through an opaque object. And you'd think, that having something like 80 or so years of video footage you'd have something like this happen while not actually being any editing tricks specifically attempting to get the desired result.
These aren't reporters holding a small mic at arm's length. Those are big boom mics on boom poles scooping to the point of almost touching Biden's blazer to get as close to the source as possible. The long lens used flattens the image and makes it hard to perceive the distances correctly. Watch the alternate angle.
The article was obviously written by someone who either hasn’t seen it, or knows nothing about video editing. It is most definitely a poorly created composited overlay. It was obviously enlarged and already was at a low resolution which is why it appears pixelated, fuzzy, and jumpy.
I hope they didn’t pay too much, but knowing them they paid a high price to one of those ‘smartest people in the world’ guys.
How is it "an optical illusion, OR a technical glitch"?? These are two completely different things. They're just saying "take some other explanation. I don't know, fuck it, whatever answer you like."
If the media is actually covering this and putting out a story deboonking it that means it is 100% true. I am starting to believe Biden actually died but they feel it is too early for Kamala to jump in so they are literally weekend at bernie's-ing us.
They have a lot of shit they want to blame on Biden so that kamala can come in and be "a welcome breath of fresh air" or some bullshit. Biden is disposable so they want to use him up before dropping him.
OK everyone...just shut up about it. "Blue Tick Twitter users" have told us what to believe so that's the final word on everything. I was wondering if our Constitution would be officially replaced after it was used for toilet paper. Now we know.
Anyone that watches that clip and doesn't believe it was a green screen is a fucking idiot. What happened would literally be impossible if it were live footage and no green screen was involved.
As shown in this post, he phases through a mic from the other angle too. And the grey mic that should be behind him from the first view is nowhere to be found.
Important question. Can we use this against them? We need our memesmiths to make some really poorly edited clips and claim it's just an optical illusion.
Have not bothered to watch the video in question, does not have to be a green screen. Video walls are in use all over. News rooms, sports shows, and even in movie production (Mandalorian).
They can film anyone in front of pretty much any background scene. Pretty easy to layer in 3D objects or other video on top of what is being filmed too.
Something looks weird and we immediately assume the only explanation is deep state psyop. If anyone tries to point out otherwise, they're part of the psyop.
Then we wonder why people don't believe us when we talk about voter fraud.
That said, it's pretty powerful meme material, if a lot of people think it's believable that Joe is so fucked in the head that they would fake press encounters.
Yeah, aside from the video content itself, the timing and nature of the moment is weird, given recent coverage of conspiracy theories around the presidency.
I agree we shouldn't immediately assume only one explanation, which is what a lot of the media does, then implies you're crazy for not accepting the "obvious truth". If people start to realize their MO, they will question more. Instead of accepting "illusion/glitch", "baseless claims", etc.
Not to be a naysayer, because that moment in the video looks very odd. BUT, one thing I noticed is that as he walks toward the helicopter, his jacket is blowing in the wind. So there is a chance that this is all just some illusion.
I find it hard to believe that they had a fan setup for him in a room to blow his jacket.
There's definitely a chance that all weirdness in the video is a combination of perspective, resolution, textures, etc. producing an illusion. Can't rule it out. This article is not an explanation of that though. It's a smug suggestion that the "correct" answer is obvious to those with the right attitude, and anything else is safely assumed to be ridiculous. Someone else here mentioned the emperor's new clothes.
These people are so used to just making shit up they don’t even know how to properly debunk things anymore. Strange video to be sure, but given the resolution, it can easily be explained away as artifacts creating halos around the objects which makes them look weird when they pass each other.
This has made it to the front page here and Torba shared to everyone on gab as well. We’ve got to stop this fake news shit from spreading, they’ll use it against us. Unfortunately the media could actually debunk this, but as usual they don’t do their jobs.
Yes, the media's "debunking" here takes the form of assuming the truth is obvious (not demonstrating it), and conditioning people to treat anything else as ridiculous. I agree it's possible it is an illusion based on a number of factors coming together deceptively. But not because it's been demonstrated, nor because I believe a "technical glitch" could be responsible, nor because people's honest reaction to suspicious video is only evidence of "rich imagination", etc.
They are gaslighting. And perhaps they made it so obvious intentionally. It's the Soviet tactic of forcing people to repeat things they KNOW are lies. It is to break the human spirit through humiliation and intimidation. And it works on just under half the population.
Yeah that's quite possible. Is there research on that population percentage? Like is that from observing other regimes?
There have been a number of psychology experiments where the researchers will do things like place two identical objects (A & B) on a table. Then they'll have many people in a room, different ratios of controlled and uncontrolled.
Which object is bigger? With the controlled members all saying "B is bigger" and then seeing how the uncontrolled members respond.
These have been done with increasingly ridiculous situations, where it's clear the controlled members are just ridiculous, buy the group mentality still tends to win over most people.
Look how many people will say that a man, in a dress, is actually a woman. Then they'll say toxic masculinity is must end the male abuse of women, then they'll watch a man shatter a woman's skull in a pay-per-view fight and celebrate how progressive it is.
Perfect example of this.
There are FOUR lights!
Best TNG episode ever.
What no love for shades of grey?
Nooooot so much, lol. "Inner Light" is perhaps a tie with "Chain of Command." Not that I watched a lot of Star Trek or anything.
"What I didn't put in the report was that at the end he gave me a choice – between a life of comfort or more torture. All I had to do was to say that I could see five lights when, in fact, there were only four."
"You didn't say it?"
"No! No. But I was going to. I would have told him anything. Anything at all! But more than that, I believed that I could see five lights."
Star Trek TNG
Before those studies, we used to tell kids the story of "The Emperor's New Clothes." I think about it all the time.
Fact check: Reliable sources say the emperors clothes are a regal masterpiece that definitely exist.
Fact checkers appeared very quickly and began shouting very loudly when the truth started coming out.
All I know is that I never heard, read or watched on the media so many damn ‘fact checks’ this, fact check that, fact check out he wazoo, until around late 2015-2016. Hmmm wonder what changed.
Got any sources or links to the group studies? Sounds like a powerful example of group think. Would love to hear more about this
Ya I was going to say this is a very famous (like day 2 or 3 in almost all psych 101 classes, after the Stanford prison experiment and the electric shock test) and is widely replicated. The Asch conformity study is the most famous. These three studies tell you all you need to know about totalitarianism and the nature of most people.
For those who dont know, the stanford prison experiment was a bunch of people role playing a prison. They had to stop it because the "guards" were beating the inmates after a few days. The electric shock study had participants administer shocks to another "subject" when they answered a question wrong. The second subject (the one getting the shocks) was really a researcher or recording who'd scream in agony and beg them to stop, but there would be another researcher telling the subject administering the shocks to keep going. Every time they shocked they increased the voltage. They wanted to see how far people would go when an official figure (researcher) told them to. Almost everyone kept going past the point where the "shockee" complained of heart problems and even stopped responding. It is actually terrifying.
Another interesting study, the dark room study. They put random people (girls and guys) in a locked room that was totally 100% dark.. but they had night vision cams to watch them.
In almost every group people started hooking up... random people who didn't know eachother and couldn't see eachother in a dark room full of strangers.
The stanford experiment is absolute evidence why the military and cop trusters are fools. Normal people were "just following orders," imagine what a massive group of people who were specifically trained to "just follow orders" will do when (not if but WHEN) turned on us.
Couldn't agree more. Now these people are random Joes, in fact a rule of thumb when you're talking about psychological experimentation is a lot of the subjects are college students bc they're an easy place to get participants from.
They haven't had years of "respect the chain of command!" .. "never question a superior officer!" .. etc beat into their Operating System. If normal people will follow a random researchers encouragement (they never ordered, they just said "it is imperative to the study that you continue") to the point where they're shocking the body of an unresponsive dude who complained of heart complications imagine what soldiers would do when commanded by their superior officer. It's scary.
It has also played out over and over again throughout the history of the world. People think we're somehow fundamentally different than those that came before us. I think they'll be suprised.
Yep. This line of discussion about blindly doing whatever random experimenters say also applies perfectly to masks.
College students do get some of this though. They’re essentially conditioned to think that professors, researchers, etc are their intellectual superiors. So in this situation there is a sort of implied chain of command.
I dunno how bad things got in the army after I got out, but the soldiers I worked with wouldn't do that shit even if we were ordered to. We had an extremely low tolerance for bullshit and if something was wrong we had no issues making that clear. We'd do stupid busywork and other nonsense if told to, yes, but something that is obviously an unlawful order on the of it? It wasn't going to happen.
Any group with power over a second group, and the subordinate group has no means of self defence (like firearms), and when there is no impartial third group properly regulating the empowered first group when arming the second group would be impossible in those rare cases like a prison population.
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/06/18/report-1971-stanford-prison-experiment-was-fake-acted-out/
A couple years ago this came out, I think it’s super interesting because Stanford experiment still gets referenced quite frequently.
The Asch conformity studies fit this description. Classic example here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYIh4MkcfJA
I don’t know why you’re getting downvoted. I mean the experiments aren’t invalid but I know what you’re talking about. It’s related to this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empathising%E2%80%93systemising_theory (notice all the tabula rasa nonsense on there about “muh sexism”)
Measured by how many fake votes they seem to need. I think that number has actually gone up over the last 8 years. They're losing, but now moving onto more "hard" fascism to get the upper hand. No more need for pesky votes.
That'd be hard Communism. Thanks for the interesting info tho. Makes sense.
Same thing.
But they’re still going to scream that we are the real Bad Guys™️
At this point, the only moral factor left in our situation is whether or not we are going to allow these abusers to continue to hurt us, our homes, our future, our children and our children's future.
By now it is nothing less than morally imperative that we eliminate the abusers by any means necessary.
Any. Means. Necessary.
It is morally reprehensible for us to sit around and allow these sick freaks free reign to abuse and destroy everything they want.
Can you please explain how it is hard communism and not hard fascism that was described?
Of course you can’t. So stop it.
Both are collectivist philosophies so the distinction is irrelevant for the purpose of this argument. Both systems place the collective need higher than individual liberty and neither system allowed other political viewpoints to be represented.
The purpose of the argument was about fake voting, collectivism has nothing to do with that. Communism is the one that deceitfully presents itself as a populist ideology carrying out the will of the people, hence calling their countries republics and holding "elections" even when there's only one candidate allowed.
Fascism doesn't pretend to be democratic in the slightest.
That's a fair point.
They are the same thing.
In fascism, someone "owns" a company, but government beaurocrats decide how he should run it, and government taxes him as much as they like to take all the profits.
In Communism, someone "runs" a company that the government owns, but government beaurocrats decide how he should run it and the government takes all the profits since they own it.
Different words but same idea: total government control where people are all basically slaves.
yep
Do you have any examples for this, or somewhere to read more?
Hey friend.
https://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/the-smith-mundt-modernization-act-of-2012/279881
Thanks, good info!
Correct. They are methodically, deliberately getting people to accept lies about things they witness with their own eyes.
Cf. "there was no election fraud" when everyone with functioning eyes saw the blatant fraud perpetrated for hours on TV
This is mind control at its finest. Look you right in the eye and state the opposite of reality. Stick to it long enough, and the masses will eventually relent and accept the twisted view of reality. It works FLAWLESSLY, with 100% predictable precision. They own the minds of the masses of this planet outright.
2+2=5
They actually do teach that 2+2=5.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CKCPh-JDM9F/
The next generation will only believe blatant CGI deep fake news. Any honest narratives and real footage will be repellent to them.
https://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/the-smith-mundt-modernization-act-of-2012/279881
The hand is drawn over the microphone that is supposed to be closer to the camera - that's not a friggin optical illusion, and if it's a technical glitch, it's a glitch in whatever fuckery they were up to. It seems the goal is exactly that - "what do you mean Old Joe is overlaid on the frame, that's just your eyes playing tricks on you."
Correct. It is literally impossible for that shot to be an "optical illusion", and can only be possible with editing of some sort. They fucked up, and the press is 100% covering for them. This is a classic liberal "Who you gonna believe, me or your lying eyes" case.
The "press" was likely in on the fuckery themselves. It will be interesting to see how long they are willing and able to keep up the charade that Biden is making any decisions, establishing policies, or has any real involvement in this regime besides being trotted out occasionally to give completely scripted, prerecorded, rehearsed, and heavily edited statements.
I would believe the people who did this were given approval by the White House. I think they were trying to make it look like he was right next to the press, but he was a lot further away, which you can see in the second video from another angle. Because his avoidance of people is starting to be a meme.
Whoever edited that video was incompetent. Which is why it's being discussed. Because the dementia patient can't even take a casual question from the press without it being completely staged.
There would be no reason to isolate him if you wanted to make him seem closer. You would simply isolate the mics and zoom the rest of the video in. I’ve done some rotoscoping & green screen and I honestly can’t explain why his in focus hand would appear in front of a blurry microphone. If it happened live his hand would blur as it got too close to the camera. It’s weird. I didn’t believe all the empty White House conspiracy theories but I’m starting to wonder.
I think it was an intern or low level staffer trying to impress everyone with his/her leet editing skills.
The real mystery is why any editor would approve it being released.
Yeah. It definitely looks poorly done. I re-watched some videos of Trump talking to reporters outside of White House. During the Trump videos the background noise was super loud (I assume from Marine 1), Trump had to yell his answers. Also, in the Trump videos the mics moved around a lot more in & out of frame & you could barely hear the questions. Whereas in the Biden video you can clearly hear the questions and the mics barely move. It’s odd.
I consider anyone who believes corporate media over their own five senses to be a threat and dangerous.
How much effort does it take to set up something like this?
This might be unrelated, but it also leads me to wonder why biden announced his next press conference 10 days in advance?
They got caught and are trying to cover it up, also when did blue check marks on Twitter become the final word on things "did not bother blue tick Twitter users", so if it doesn't bother them then it must be fine, huh!?! Aren't they just people like everyone else except might be famous, what makes them the end all be all of things
The only people left on Twitter are the ones they've decided will repeat that 2+2=5, math is racist, those suitcases of ballots were perfectly normal and legal, and Trump insulted Japan by feeding fish. The ones they kicked off aren't having this shit.
Oh the joys of peer pressure, humiliation, and intimidation. It is exactly what caused Peter to deny Christ three times.
Oh, the blue ticks signed off on it. Whew! For a second I was worried we installed a vegetable as president.
Think as you are told, comrade.
They're the ones running all the authoritative information on the election, Jan 6, covid, and every other fact check.
media called -> blue ticks called
they're evolving
They’re certainly all ticks.
Either they got caught and are now trying to cover it up... or worse, they did this on purpose so that when they do more of it they've got the narrative of "don't listen to the insane conspiracy theorists, we already 'proved' they're wrong, Biden is totes alive, promise"
Agree, this media message conditions people to ridicule the idea of manipulated video and stay in the safe "majority" opinion, e.g. "the incident did not trouble too many". And yeah, the actual video seems so blatant, it could well have been on purpose, for one reason or another.
What media outlet is the screenshot from? I'm curious as to who's behind this gaslighting propaganda here.
Newsweek
Oh shit so that's not some random blogger, that's from a source that half the country considers to be reputable and honest.
That is a terrifying degree of gaslighting.
Nobody reads Newsweek, it’s not 1993 anymore.
The Lugenpresse is a racial problem, not a news industry problem. One ethno-religion is instructed as youths to enter positions of power, and control the distribution of knowledge. They are racial supremacists, and responsible for 99% of television's racist jokes since 1960. They'll insult everyone else freely, but you'll be insta-cancelled if you criticize them.
Guess who.
The majority opinion is not held by the majority.
I believe it was intentional. It also makes us waste our energy on stupid, unproductive shit.
these people are sick
Biden is alive
that’s not what is being questioned
Never said he wasn't. I'm talking about setting the stage of misdirecting the public and brushing anything questionable onto "conspiracy theorists".
Oh FFS! They are going to twist this just like the ballot suitcases and then call it fact checked.
This doesn't appear to be a green screen. It's possible, but after years of editing what jumps out to me here is that it is a layered video. At least three layers deep. They've used a masked/clipped layer to cut in the mic and then re-layer over his hands.
Most people think of editing as cutting different angles and clips together (jumping around in time) but there is the other type of editing where you layer multiple video files on top of one another to create a scene that didn't actually take place. That layering is what we see here.
So, really, why? What reason would they have for doing this? Best I can figure is that he is so incompetent (dementia) that he can't be trusted to give an interview without royally messing it up. They filmed him walking over to his handler with que cards or a teleprompter, read his script, and then cut in the audio and video of a reporter(s) afterwards.
Also, this editing is offensively bad. I could have done better with decade old equipment in my first year of editing. Like, can they not afford someone at least mildly competent at producing their propaganda? If they lie about this, what the hell are we supposed to trust?
My thoughts exactly. It appears to be a poorly edited composited video and the only reason I can think of as to why it's done so badly is because it was rushed. That or it's been done purposely bad to see how far they can fool the general public, which if recent years has proven anything, they'll believe anything.
it reminded me of Mystery Science Theater 3000 with the microphones being the robots sitting in the theater seats watching the Biden film
Robots are the top layer in mst3k. Biden is top layer here
but like only part of biden, which makes the whole afair even more odd.
The helicopter isn’t even running yet they got that sound maxed out. I don’t understand how someone could fuck up that bad.
Thank you for catching that Fren, it just blew my mind!
I would agree on your latter assertion ... except that "These people are stupid". so the first alternative is possible.
well, they probably hired their video editor based on diversity points rather than actual skills and this is what they got...
I literally just about choked on my covfefe, thank you for the laugh. +10 internet points to you!
I'm glad it made you laugh. I'm positive that there's truth to what I said.
I identify as a skilled worker. Does that count?
Just some more quality work from the H1B visa Indians
Dude, think.
1) Why would you mask and layer a shot where all the elements are already there? You wouldn't. So that means some element was missing.
What was missing? What needed to be added or moved? Was it:
Scenario A) The mics were added (unlikely)
In which case just paste them in on top and be done with it. Biden is intended to be behind them at all times so there's literally no point to have him masked... yet he clearly is masked! He can't go over those mics without being masked!
Scenario B) Biden was added (makes way more sense)
If Biden was the missing element, it makes sense for him to be masked, and that obviously means green screen. It explains why you'd even bother with this in this shot in the first place.
2) Why would your news team selectively edit in shit, like mics, which takes time, in a trivial interview that makes no difference either way, only to have your competitor run their unedited shot 30 minutes earlier with no mics and leave viewers like, wtf, why did this one group add mics in post that's fucking weird. Just run the clip of Biden.
So no, they did not film Biden faking an interview ON LOCATION then add reporters after. They filmed Biden OFF LOCATION then added him to the location with or without reporters.
It's definitely Biden that was added:
https://twitter.com/RyanOfKalamazoo/status/1372051723561353217
You can see the grass on the right of his sleeve that has been cut off. Couldn't have happened unless he was an added layer.
The mics can't go beneath him unless he's an added layer. There's simply no denying what has occurred.
Nuh uh bigot! Its clearly just an optical illusion created from lens flare lossless rotoscope of twitter compression artifacts!
Definitely. Just look at the full video here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBPmaf7ffg8
it's so painfully obvious, please watch the video.
Good points. I have no idea why they would do this. Its possible they did a triple layer but literally none of these scenarios make an sense at all. If he is on a green screen it is a hell of a lot of work to get it to match the perspective, angles, lighting, etc. It would be so much easier to just have him act out a presser and then paste in the mics. If so, then there is zero reason (except incompetence) to make a third layer of his arm.
My conclusion as well. Is there a green screen? Probably not. But why layers? Why would anyone layer this?
They didn't.
No. I've been bad at photoshop long enough to see that is a composition.
Compositing is the term if people feel like looking at examples.
With the number of mics they are claiming are there, it shouldn't be too hard to show us a different angle?
They stole a presidential election on live television and left a mountain of evidence higher than the f#cking Tower of Babel, then said it was the most secure election in world history.
I'm surprised they even bothered to answer the questions about the glitch.
Also, the blue checktards would eat their own shyte if the Globocommiecrats told them to.
Fact. The pedo satanists often make their child victims eat their own feces to degrade them further, while torturing them. "See? You're eating your own shit, you ARE shit, all you'll ever be is a bag of soft warm shit to fuck. You deserve this and more, and you're gonna get it."
That's how they're treating innocent, defenseless children, while the rest of us sit here and wonder when will this nightmare WE'RE going through ever end. When can it be stopped. When! Is whenfagging the same as datefagging? If it is, sorry
Plus, they know the left and right will fight over this obviously doctored video right down party lines. They want conflict to escalate. It's more provocation, just like the constant leftist rioting and the mask mandates.
Nothing that happens with these neomarxists is harmless. Stay vigilant.
my hands go through mics all the time. common glitch.
soon he'll be able to bend spoons
lol soon you will see the truth.
what truth?
there are no mics
We have to trust, believe in, & follow The Science (peace be upon it) and The Science (peace be upon it) says this was an optical illusion.
"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain"
The Scarecrow is in the White House.
"Who are you going to believe? Us, or your own lying eyes?"
Lol "blue tick Twitter users". There's two classes. The intellectual "Blue ticks", and the rest of us idiots.
If you wanna be among the "in" crowd, the cool kids with the fake blue CHECKMARK,....then you gotta disbelieve what your own eyes are telling you, and believe what your peer group wants you to believe.
Random D-list celebrities have blue ticks on Twitter. Who made these people the arbiters of truth? This country is a pathetic fucking joke now.
The blue tick. The blue parasite. (what's a synonym for blue? nasty)
"The nasty parasitic Twitter users were not bothered."
Well, I'm not surprised.
If it were fake, they would not even acknowledge its existence. The fact that they're trying to prove us wrong simply means we're over the target.
“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
-George Orwell
And so the conditioning continues, training a generation to repeat the lies that they know are lies.
another angle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAPYk1XjwhU
which also looks weird as hell and his hand clips over a mic.
Holy shit the community is going full retard on this “CGI interview”.
Yup
Where is this post from?
Newsweek
C-span covered it up.
Yeah https://www.c-span.org/video/?509926-1/president-plans-visit-southern-border
Once you know what to look for you can still see it under the graphic.
Unbelievable!
The incident did not trouble many "blue tick Twitter users"... because they are the smart ones, ya know? So many layers of bullshit.
I find it odd that those two mics are exceptionally visible in all other media, particularly the stills. Photographers aren't that sloppy. How many photographers can take the effort to make sure those two mics are in their still shot? Now I do sound completely nuts, but it seems convenient those two mics are all over the stills, as to suggest, see, they're there.
very conspicuously never see his feet either. That would have been a lot more work to mask around.
They're in all the shots because they were closest to him.
Jesus, this is the most embarrassing bullshit this site has fallen for since the fake BLM tweet.
anyone disputing this is a shill. The editing job is like 1970s bad, there is no denying its a composited video.
You know fuck all about video compositing.
It would be virtually impossible to combine the elements present in this video. The camera movement would have to be motion controlled on Biden, the BG, and the reporters at the end.
You see what you want to see.
look whos talking. You can mask out any object you want and apply motion stabilization, resize, whatever you want.
Now, its hard to do well, which is exactly why this amateur attempt looks so hinky.
Yeah. I don’t know how much experience the person you are communicating with has, but the shit that can be faked at this point is endless. It is hard to do...well. But yes, you can change perspective over time now with After Effects and have it match cameras from different sources that have different variables. Hell, it’s what most of the latest tutorials for After Effects are about. I just went through a bunch.
I have a diploma in film production and my girlfriend is a VFX artist. We're laughing at you retards right now.
Not when the fucking camera is panning, tilting and zooming in and out. If all these elements were shot separately, you need to know everything from the distance of the subject to the lens, the height of the lens, the lens length, which are all changing in the shot, and have a motion control rig to perfectly repeat each action for each pass, or else the change in perspective would make everything look like it's sliding around independently and warping. You can't just take a bunch of elements and fit it all together in post without very careful consideration of all those elements. I have a diploma in film production; I know what can be achieved convincingly and what it would take to do so. So you can miss me with your "whatever you want" bullshit.
Edit: Oh look! Here's a picture of Trump with the press showing how close the mics get to the subject:
https://patriots.win/p/12hkvte2PC/one-is-genuineone-is-fake/c/
And an alternate angle of Biden showing the compression of the lens in the Hill footage (notice the grey mic is actually 2 or 3 ft to his right):
https://streamable.com/ve91lf
So are you saying its virtually impossible which is why it glitched or that it is perfectly normal video since it would be impossible to fake?
Forgetting about Biden's hands for a second, It would be impossible to combine all the other elements in the scene and have it be consistent and believable due to the variation of things like subject to camera distance, changing the lens length and shot composition. Not to mention doing all that with two different cameras as we can see footage from both WaPo and The Hill.
The reason people are confused is because they think the mics are smaller than they are and closer to the camera than they are. This is because shooting on a long lens flattens the image and makes it difficult to determine the distances of elements in the scene.So if the image is flattened and the mic is actually bigger than one might think, it would look like the mic is between the camera and his hands when it is really between Biden and his hands, which can be confirmed in the WaPo footage.
Anybody trying to tell you it can be done in After Effects doesn't know the complications involved in doing everything BUT Biden's "hand glitch" to make it look convincing.
It is a trick of perspective caused by a lens probably between 50mm and 70mm.
dude if you look at the FULL video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBPmaf7ffg8
you can clearly see it's 1 big studio green screen, from the start where he walks out the whitehouse, all the way into the chopper.
then they greenscreened the chopper in another place and pretended to get him on the plane.
I'm actually impressed they got the plane airborne in a green screen studio though, it's clear the dems are masters of the deepfakes
Lol. Indeed; must have been a big sound stage.
Yeah I see it now from that second angle you posted. That amount of compression has to be higher than 70 or my experience with full frame slr does not apply.
Yeah I think you're right. Although I might be technically correct because Cine/news cameras are usually Super 35, so 50-70mm lens would have the FoV of an 80-120mm FF, I was estimating in terms of full frame. To me it looks to be approaching normal width by the time he stops walking, but if I were to put money on it, I'd say around 70-85mm FF. 100mm seems high, but I could be wrong.
Most of the stuff you are describing, especially the movement, is done by shooting a wide wide shot, then moving and bobbing the zoomed in portion. It looks like it is being hand held, but it's static and you are only seeing the smaller frame shaking. Is that not possible?
I've watched about 50 videos of people doing that, but maybe it's different somehow here.
^^^found the guy (tranny?) that edited the video^^^^
Cope harder, retard.
Its absolutely impossible for a object to appear through an opaque object. And you'd think, that having something like 80 or so years of video footage you'd have something like this happen while not actually being any editing tricks specifically attempting to get the desired result.
These aren't reporters holding a small mic at arm's length. Those are big boom mics on boom poles scooping to the point of almost touching Biden's blazer to get as close to the source as possible. The long lens used flattens the image and makes it hard to perceive the distances correctly. Watch the alternate angle.
In all the years of Trump videos i have never ever seen a technical error or glitch resulting in Trump bending time and space.
Or Obama. This shit has only been happening with Biden, like his hair disappearing in the other video.
The key part is “might possibly” aka they did no analysis.
The article was obviously written by someone who either hasn’t seen it, or knows nothing about video editing. It is most definitely a poorly created composited overlay. It was obviously enlarged and already was at a low resolution which is why it appears pixelated, fuzzy, and jumpy. I hope they didn’t pay too much, but knowing them they paid a high price to one of those ‘smartest people in the world’ guys.
How is it "an optical illusion, OR a technical glitch"?? These are two completely different things. They're just saying "take some other explanation. I don't know, fuck it, whatever answer you like."
Swamp gas, uh, distorted the light. A weather balloon reflected the light of venus, tricking you into thinking, uh... fuck. Look at this shiney thing.
If the media is actually covering this and putting out a story deboonking it that means it is 100% true. I am starting to believe Biden actually died but they feel it is too early for Kamala to jump in so they are literally weekend at bernie's-ing us.
They have a lot of shit they want to blame on Biden so that kamala can come in and be "a welcome breath of fresh air" or some bullshit. Biden is disposable so they want to use him up before dropping him.
notice the subtle division of separating the all knowing blue tick twitter users.
The media is an optical illusion.
Yes the glitch where you forget to overlay the image on top of the actor.
original from Newsweek
If its an optical illusion then can someone show how this illusion is done?
Congrats you’re now qualified to work for the FBI!
It's the same glitch that hit the election.
OK everyone...just shut up about it. "Blue Tick Twitter users" have told us what to believe so that's the final word on everything. I was wondering if our Constitution would be officially replaced after it was used for toilet paper. Now we know.
Why are they talking about Twitter verified users like they are the last line of knowledge and truth. Fuck.
anyone who thinks that was a optical illusion needs to get their brain examined
Anyone that watches that clip and doesn't believe it was a green screen is a fucking idiot. What happened would literally be impossible if it were live footage and no green screen was involved.
It could be a bluescreen. Lol.
Rotoscope. Purposely.
Does anyone remember the summer pic of him and KH that said they were in Virginia in the dead of winter?
As shown in this post, he phases through a mic from the other angle too. And the grey mic that should be behind him from the first view is nowhere to be found.
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/12hkvte2H3/bidens-hand-overlaps-mic-thats-i/c/
GrEeN sCrEen gAsLiGhTiNg MuCh?
They just can't help but brag that we now have the most diverse all-female press conference production team in history.
Fucking stupid as fuck
"Might explain" Yeah, if you're retarded.
Well, as long as the Blue Checkmarks thought it was cool, then I'm good with it. 🙄
Important question. Can we use this against them? We need our memesmiths to make some really poorly edited clips and claim it's just an optical illusion.
MSM: who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?
This quote seems more fitting everyday: “In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act” -Orwell
"Fake News" is reaching new levels.
Well if the blue ticks are not concerned... 🙄
We are well past “burn it all down” and into “nuke them til they glow so we can shoot them in the dark”
It is a technical glitch
Of the fucking fake video. Mics are fake!
Mics are racist! Stop being transphobic! Quick look over there!
The media has reached cartoon-levels of stupidity.
Have not bothered to watch the video in question, does not have to be a green screen. Video walls are in use all over. News rooms, sports shows, and even in movie production (Mandalorian).
They can film anyone in front of pretty much any background scene. Pretty easy to layer in 3D objects or other video on top of what is being filmed too.
Doesn't have to be a greenscreen, but definitely compositing. Things switched layers, going in front and behind biden, so not a videowall.
Greenscreen makes compositing easier, but it's an optional step in the process.
Bullshit. His hands literally ghosted THROUGH THE MICS
Can someone post another video like this? If it’s just a trick of the eye, we’d see other examples.
We are Alex Jonesing ourselves.
Something looks weird and we immediately assume the only explanation is deep state psyop. If anyone tries to point out otherwise, they're part of the psyop.
Then we wonder why people don't believe us when we talk about voter fraud.
That said, it's pretty powerful meme material, if a lot of people think it's believable that Joe is so fucked in the head that they would fake press encounters.
Yeah, aside from the video content itself, the timing and nature of the moment is weird, given recent coverage of conspiracy theories around the presidency.
I agree we shouldn't immediately assume only one explanation, which is what a lot of the media does, then implies you're crazy for not accepting the "obvious truth". If people start to realize their MO, they will question more. Instead of accepting "illusion/glitch", "baseless claims", etc.
Not to be a naysayer, because that moment in the video looks very odd. BUT, one thing I noticed is that as he walks toward the helicopter, his jacket is blowing in the wind. So there is a chance that this is all just some illusion.
I find it hard to believe that they had a fan setup for him in a room to blow his jacket.
There's definitely a chance that all weirdness in the video is a combination of perspective, resolution, textures, etc. producing an illusion. Can't rule it out. This article is not an explanation of that though. It's a smug suggestion that the "correct" answer is obvious to those with the right attitude, and anything else is safely assumed to be ridiculous. Someone else here mentioned the emperor's new clothes.
What wind though? The chopper blade wasn't turning and no one else appears to be affected by the wind.
These people are so used to just making shit up they don’t even know how to properly debunk things anymore. Strange video to be sure, but given the resolution, it can easily be explained away as artifacts creating halos around the objects which makes them look weird when they pass each other.
This has made it to the front page here and Torba shared to everyone on gab as well. We’ve got to stop this fake news shit from spreading, they’ll use it against us. Unfortunately the media could actually debunk this, but as usual they don’t do their jobs.
Yes, the media's "debunking" here takes the form of assuming the truth is obvious (not demonstrating it), and conditioning people to treat anything else as ridiculous. I agree it's possible it is an illusion based on a number of factors coming together deceptively. But not because it's been demonstrated, nor because I believe a "technical glitch" could be responsible, nor because people's honest reaction to suspicious video is only evidence of "rich imagination", etc.