Measured by how many fake votes they seem to need. I think that number has actually gone up over the last 8 years. They're losing, but now moving onto more "hard" fascism to get the upper hand. No more need for pesky votes.
At this point, the only moral factor left in our situation is whether or not we are going to allow these abusers to continue to hurt us, our homes, our future, our children and our children's future.
By now it is nothing less than morally imperative that we eliminate the abusers by any means necessary.
Any. Means. Necessary.
It is morally reprehensible for us to sit around and allow these sick freaks free reign to abuse and destroy everything they want.
Both are collectivist philosophies so the distinction is irrelevant for the purpose of this argument. Both systems place the collective need higher than individual liberty and neither system allowed other political viewpoints to be represented.
The purpose of the argument was about fake voting, collectivism has nothing to do with that. Communism is the one that deceitfully presents itself as a populist ideology carrying out the will of the people, hence calling their countries republics and holding "elections" even when there's only one candidate allowed.
Fascism doesn't pretend to be democratic in the slightest.
In fascism, someone "owns" a company, but government beaurocrats decide how he should run it, and government taxes him as much as they like to take all the profits.
In Communism, someone "runs" a company that the government owns, but government beaurocrats decide how he should run it and the government takes all the profits since they own it.
Different words but same idea: total government control where people are all basically slaves.
In fascism, someone "owns" a company, but government beaurocrats decide how he should run it, and government taxes him as much as they like to take all the profits.
Do you have any examples for this, or somewhere to read more?
Measured by how many fake votes they seem to need. I think that number has actually gone up over the last 8 years. They're losing, but now moving onto more "hard" fascism to get the upper hand. No more need for pesky votes.
That'd be hard Communism. Thanks for the interesting info tho. Makes sense.
Same thing.
But they’re still going to scream that we are the real Bad Guys™️
At this point, the only moral factor left in our situation is whether or not we are going to allow these abusers to continue to hurt us, our homes, our future, our children and our children's future.
By now it is nothing less than morally imperative that we eliminate the abusers by any means necessary.
Any. Means. Necessary.
It is morally reprehensible for us to sit around and allow these sick freaks free reign to abuse and destroy everything they want.
Can you please explain how it is hard communism and not hard fascism that was described?
Of course you can’t. So stop it.
Both are collectivist philosophies so the distinction is irrelevant for the purpose of this argument. Both systems place the collective need higher than individual liberty and neither system allowed other political viewpoints to be represented.
The purpose of the argument was about fake voting, collectivism has nothing to do with that. Communism is the one that deceitfully presents itself as a populist ideology carrying out the will of the people, hence calling their countries republics and holding "elections" even when there's only one candidate allowed.
Fascism doesn't pretend to be democratic in the slightest.
They are the same thing.
In fascism, someone "owns" a company, but government beaurocrats decide how he should run it, and government taxes him as much as they like to take all the profits.
In Communism, someone "runs" a company that the government owns, but government beaurocrats decide how he should run it and the government takes all the profits since they own it.
Different words but same idea: total government control where people are all basically slaves.
yep
Do you have any examples for this, or somewhere to read more?