Oh FFS! They are going to twist this just like the ballot suitcases and then call it fact checked.
This doesn't appear to be a green screen. It's possible, but after years of editing what jumps out to me here is that it is a layered video. At least three layers deep. They've used a masked/clipped layer to cut in the mic and then re-layer over his hands.
Most people think of editing as cutting different angles and clips together (jumping around in time) but there is the other type of editing where you layer multiple video files on top of one another to create a scene that didn't actually take place. That layering is what we see here.
So, really, why? What reason would they have for doing this? Best I can figure is that he is so incompetent (dementia) that he can't be trusted to give an interview without royally messing it up. They filmed him walking over to his handler with que cards or a teleprompter, read his script, and then cut in the audio and video of a reporter(s) afterwards.
Also, this editing is offensively bad. I could have done better with decade old equipment in my first year of editing. Like, can they not afford someone at least mildly competent at producing their propaganda? If they lie about this, what the hell are we supposed to trust?
My thoughts exactly. It appears to be a poorly edited composited video and the only reason I can think of as to why it's done so badly is because it was rushed. That or it's been done purposely bad to see how far they can fool the general public, which if recent years has proven anything, they'll believe anything.
Oh FFS! They are going to twist this just like the ballot suitcases and then call it fact checked.
This doesn't appear to be a green screen. It's possible, but after years of editing what jumps out to me here is that it is a layered video. At least three layers deep. They've used a masked/clipped layer to cut in the mic and then re-layer over his hands.
Most people think of editing as cutting different angles and clips together (jumping around in time) but there is the other type of editing where you layer multiple video files on top of one another to create a scene that didn't actually take place. That layering is what we see here.
So, really, why? What reason would they have for doing this? Best I can figure is that he is so incompetent (dementia) that he can't be trusted to give an interview without royally messing it up. They filmed him walking over to his handler with que cards or a teleprompter, read his script, and then cut in the audio and video of a reporter(s) afterwards.
Also, this editing is offensively bad. I could have done better with decade old equipment in my first year of editing. Like, can they not afford someone at least mildly competent at producing their propaganda? If they lie about this, what the hell are we supposed to trust?
My thoughts exactly. It appears to be a poorly edited composited video and the only reason I can think of as to why it's done so badly is because it was rushed. That or it's been done purposely bad to see how far they can fool the general public, which if recent years has proven anything, they'll believe anything.
it reminded me of Mystery Science Theater 3000 with the microphones being the robots sitting in the theater seats watching the Biden film
Robots are the top layer in mst3k. Biden is top layer here