The issue with PCR tests is when you use too many cycles (>30), as almost all labs were doing. Each cycle increases what is being looked for (in this case the Sars-Cov-2 virus) with a steep exponential curve. With each additional cycle, it goes from "there are many fragments, and therefore there is likely enough active virus" to "there is a single fragment, and no active virus."
The test is also supposed to be part of a diagnostic process. Everyone reports a positive PCR test as a positive result for Covid-19. That's not actual science. If you have a positive result (with a reasonable cycle limit <=30), and symptoms then the person likely has the disease.
You can find recordings of the (late) creator of the PCR test talking about it, and also about Fauci being a fraud.
They never even isolated the "virus", tested for a common marker for all coronaviruses.
In 2015 and later, there were studies done in GB during flu season what kind of viruses are in the sick. 8-15% tested positive for coronaviruses....
About 11% test positive rates here in my state, what a surprise. Problem is, that they are all called Covid now instead of "some of the multiple coronaviruses".....
Not sure why you’re downvoted, but I agree. Like most bad flus it only affects the old and diseased.
It’s also hell for really fat and unhealthy people. Because their heart already works really hard. Add in even more restricted breathing from the Coof, and you get predictable results.
The issue with PCR tests is when you use too many cycles (>30), as almost all labs were doing. Each cycle increases what is being looked for (in this case the Sars-Cov-2 virus) with a steep exponential curve. With each additional cycle, it goes from "there are many fragments, and therefore there is likely enough active virus" to "there is a single fragment, and no active virus."
The test is also supposed to be part of a diagnostic process. Everyone reports a positive PCR test as a positive result for Covid-19. That's not actual science. If you have a positive result (with a reasonable cycle limit <=30), and symptoms then the person likely has the disease.
You can find recordings of the (late) creator of the PCR test talking about it, and also about Fauci being a fraud.
They never even isolated the "virus", tested for a common marker for all coronaviruses. In 2015 and later, there were studies done in GB during flu season what kind of viruses are in the sick. 8-15% tested positive for coronaviruses.... About 11% test positive rates here in my state, what a surprise. Problem is, that they are all called Covid now instead of "some of the multiple coronaviruses".....
This is funny. I made something similar and posted it yesterday.
https://patriots.win/p/12hkvrMgrp/sneaky-bastard-was-cheating-the-/c/
This must be from one of those anal swab tests
Nice artwork!
Nah it’s worse than that.
Whenever someone says they're getting a covid test, I tell them to "Flip a coin" instead.
Seems legit.
who is the artist? very nice style
Not sure why you’re downvoted, but I agree. Like most bad flus it only affects the old and diseased.
It’s also hell for really fat and unhealthy people. Because their heart already works really hard. Add in even more restricted breathing from the Coof, and you get predictable results.