1243
Comments (12)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
7
FrostedCricketFlakes 7 points ago +7 / -0

The issue with PCR tests is when you use too many cycles (>30), as almost all labs were doing. Each cycle increases what is being looked for (in this case the Sars-Cov-2 virus) with a steep exponential curve. With each additional cycle, it goes from "there are many fragments, and therefore there is likely enough active virus" to "there is a single fragment, and no active virus."

The test is also supposed to be part of a diagnostic process. Everyone reports a positive PCR test as a positive result for Covid-19. That's not actual science. If you have a positive result (with a reasonable cycle limit <=30), and symptoms then the person likely has the disease.

You can find recordings of the (late) creator of the PCR test talking about it, and also about Fauci being a fraud.

3
0815 3 points ago +3 / -0

They never even isolated the "virus", tested for a common marker for all coronaviruses. In 2015 and later, there were studies done in GB during flu season what kind of viruses are in the sick. 8-15% tested positive for coronaviruses.... About 11% test positive rates here in my state, what a surprise. Problem is, that they are all called Covid now instead of "some of the multiple coronaviruses".....