Two angles. And even if you give one the benefit of the doubt that maybe his hand was just over the mic, the second angle conflicts with it and vice versa
Something fucky is going on and between the incorrect white house window view, the split in the oval office wall, his reluctance to do any live press conferences, the cut aways, plural, when questions are to be asked of him, rhe fence up around the capital so no public civilian can see whats going on in the lobby let alone any of the rooms. Harris taking all his calls.
Yeah, OP needs to look at the video again. I've never seen a microphone that size in any press conference. And then was the same size when his hand moves behind it.
Miraculously as well, the CSPAN airing of this video had a giant text block trying to cover up the hand clipping that disappeared immediately after it happened.
Yeah, I don't know anymore. Clearly something is up with that video, but I think the Left may be doing this kind of stuff just to troll us, so we focus on the wrong things. I don't think they're actually trying to get away with anything, except for gaslighting a violent response from the Right.
So if we assume that is the mic used, then it must have been close enough to brush his hand if without changing relative size, his arm clips over and then under in the same shot.
That being the case, why is it completely out of focus both when it's behind his hand and in front of his hand, without ever transitioning?
I am intimately familiar with video compression, and can tell the difference between pixel compression and camera focus. What I'm talking about is not the simplification of color tables on the mic causing the slight blur, or more accurately, dulling effect, but the camera focus never changing on it while it is always perfectly on Biden.
simplest explanation is that biden did take questions for real, but flubbed/gaffed an answer, so they had to re-do the Q-A part afterwards by green-screen
it does not look like an "optical illusion" from an actual, unfaked live-shoot. I think that's a bullshit excuse to explain away something that I can see with my own eyes. I'm not going to be gaslit on this. I can fuckin see it plain as day in both videos where his hand gets clipped in front of the mic where perspective clearly shows that's not correct. I have good visio-spatial sense, and what I can plainly see is a manipulated video.
I don't know whether the mics were faked in or biden was faked in, but it clearly appears that one or the other is the case.
Personally, I think that biden was faked in, because that makes sense as to where the video faking software that they used would have accidentally treated the mic as "background" to overlay him over momentarily. I've seen the similar thing happen enough with faked-in backgrounds in online-meeting video calls to see that's most likely what happened.
I think the simplest explanation is that biden did take questions for real, but flubbed/gaffed an answer, so they had to re-do the Q-A part afterwards by green-screen. Or it's possible that he is such a fucking potato that they just have to straight-up do the actual press interactions via rehearsed, scripted green-screen so that he can look passably presidential. But Occam's razor tells me it's a gaffe do-over.
Shills flopping and flailing around like a fish out of water. Exposing themselves trying to defend the indefensible. This one really blindsided you guys didn't it?
It's not about a "green screen". It's about a composite image. They added in two layers of CGI. Layer 1 = Biden walking to the place. Layer 2 = fake microphones to make it look like he was talking to a crowd of journalists, when in fact he was merely talking to his handlers. Or perhaps he wasn't even talking at all, given his convenient mask and the state of voice-masking filters that are now available.
This is how you know mask mandates will NEVER be repealed during this regime. If the masks are removed, you'll be able to see that 9/10ths of all Biden comments are spoken by an aide in a van with a voice-filter on.
Wasn't a psd. Pdf. Fancy scanners have OCR that can convert images to editable pdf. Naturally, they do it by separating things out into layers. Each text block gets a layer.
The mics were on a separate layer. The rest is legit.
His hand clipped through because of a motion tracking glitch in the software. It didn’t know if the mics were supposed to be in the foreground or background in the motion track, so it made them the background.
If this kind of foolishness gets you more fired up than the actual destruction of America through legislation and EO, then you are not here for the right reasons.
This kind of garbage is what lets them get away with calling us conspiracy theorists. I debate people in real life and don't just hide inside behind a keyboard, and I constantly have to defend our legitimate arguments against the low iq idiots on our side who constantly shit all over the movement and when proven wrong they act like it never happened and move on to the next Bigfoot story.
Two angles. And even if you give one the benefit of the doubt that maybe his hand was just over the mic, the second angle conflicts with it and vice versa
Something fucky is going on and between the incorrect white house window view, the split in the oval office wall, his reluctance to do any live press conferences, the cut aways, plural, when questions are to be asked of him, rhe fence up around the capital so no public civilian can see whats going on in the lobby let alone any of the rooms. Harris taking all his calls.
Its adding up, is all I'm saying
what about the part where it shaves 2 inches off his head?
Yeah, OP needs to look at the video again. I've never seen a microphone that size in any press conference. And then was the same size when his hand moves behind it.
Miraculously as well, the CSPAN airing of this video had a giant text block trying to cover up the hand clipping that disappeared immediately after it happened.
I don't know what it was, but it wasn't nothing.
The mics are fake. The software used to soften the layers fucked up and merged his hand with the mic
See it frame by frame, the hand seems to merge with the mic, not natural for obvious reasons
So the problem I have with this assertion, is the camera pans around and you see the reporters with their mics standing there.
Why would they digitally impose mics when they're right there?
Doesn't add up.
Maybe the reporters are not there. He is afraid of the rona
You can have 2 videos, one of reporters and one with biden. merge them and you can claim he talks to the press
He has yet to hold a press conference
Yeah, I don't know anymore. Clearly something is up with that video, but I think the Left may be doing this kind of stuff just to troll us, so we focus on the wrong things. I don't think they're actually trying to get away with anything, except for gaslighting a violent response from the Right.
The helicopter is a riding lawnmower.
So if we assume that is the mic used, then it must have been close enough to brush his hand if without changing relative size, his arm clips over and then under in the same shot.
That being the case, why is it completely out of focus both when it's behind his hand and in front of his hand, without ever transitioning?
I am intimately familiar with video compression, and can tell the difference between pixel compression and camera focus. What I'm talking about is not the simplification of color tables on the mic causing the slight blur, or more accurately, dulling effect, but the camera focus never changing on it while it is always perfectly on Biden.
simplest explanation is that biden did take questions for real, but flubbed/gaffed an answer, so they had to re-do the Q-A part afterwards by green-screen
Interdimensional microphone
it does not look like an "optical illusion" from an actual, unfaked live-shoot. I think that's a bullshit excuse to explain away something that I can see with my own eyes. I'm not going to be gaslit on this. I can fuckin see it plain as day in both videos where his hand gets clipped in front of the mic where perspective clearly shows that's not correct. I have good visio-spatial sense, and what I can plainly see is a manipulated video.
I don't know whether the mics were faked in or biden was faked in, but it clearly appears that one or the other is the case.
Personally, I think that biden was faked in, because that makes sense as to where the video faking software that they used would have accidentally treated the mic as "background" to overlay him over momentarily. I've seen the similar thing happen enough with faked-in backgrounds in online-meeting video calls to see that's most likely what happened.
I think the simplest explanation is that biden did take questions for real, but flubbed/gaffed an answer, so they had to re-do the Q-A part afterwards by green-screen. Or it's possible that he is such a fucking potato that they just have to straight-up do the actual press interactions via rehearsed, scripted green-screen so that he can look passably presidential. But Occam's razor tells me it's a gaffe do-over.
He stepped in 2 gopher holes, one deeper than the next.
Here let me draw you a picture and get upvotes out of thin air.
what's in question about the shoes here?
his friggin left foot DISAPPEARS before he steps down into the "tall" grass
Grass is squishy?
There's cuckery afoot!
Got a link to actual vid?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvgrp82qktU
Something really off with the giant fluffy mics.
Those mics are like a foot long, add on the fluffy dead cat wind cover and there you go.
Shills flopping and flailing around like a fish out of water. Exposing themselves trying to defend the indefensible. This one really blindsided you guys didn't it?
Lmfao
Ok Bernie bro
It's not about a "green screen". It's about a composite image. They added in two layers of CGI. Layer 1 = Biden walking to the place. Layer 2 = fake microphones to make it look like he was talking to a crowd of journalists, when in fact he was merely talking to his handlers. Or perhaps he wasn't even talking at all, given his convenient mask and the state of voice-masking filters that are now available.
This is how you know mask mandates will NEVER be repealed during this regime. If the masks are removed, you'll be able to see that 9/10ths of all Biden comments are spoken by an aide in a van with a voice-filter on.
This reminds me of the time they purposefully released a fake Obama birth certificate on whitehouse.gov
The PSD still had all the layers on it
Wasn't a psd. Pdf. Fancy scanners have OCR that can convert images to editable pdf. Naturally, they do it by separating things out into layers. Each text block gets a layer.
The mics were on a separate layer. The rest is legit.
His hand clipped through because of a motion tracking glitch in the software. It didn’t know if the mics were supposed to be in the foreground or background in the motion track, so it made them the background.
If this kind of foolishness gets you more fired up than the actual destruction of America through legislation and EO, then you are not here for the right reasons.
This kind of garbage is what lets them get away with calling us conspiracy theorists. I debate people in real life and don't just hide inside behind a keyboard, and I constantly have to defend our legitimate arguments against the low iq idiots on our side who constantly shit all over the movement and when proven wrong they act like it never happened and move on to the next Bigfoot story.
yeah i think this is a psyop
you can see in the 2nd angle its a long boom mic that xiden the potatus walks past
its the usual Q LARPers