Cool, I’ll add this to my shelf, next to the fish tank cleaner that has hydroxychloroquine in it.
Anybody who gets medical advice from somebody who isn’t a physician usually ends up getting exactly what they paid for. Especially after both veterinarians and the CDC have warned against using horse dewormer for COVID.
But hey, if you like to live your life without warning labels, and with your ass on fire, have at it.
Prevention Studies: Six studies, 4 RCTs, 2 OCT’s with total patients included now over
2,400 patients – all showing near-perfect prevention of transmission of this virus in people
with unprotected exposure to COVID-19 patients compared to high measured rates of
transmission in those that did not receive ivermectin treatment.
Early treatment: Three RCT’s and multiple large case series –patients in these studies total
over 3,000. All studies show either a considerable, statistically significant reduction in the
number of patients who deteriorated into hospital or ICU or they reported faster recovery
from all symptoms when treated with ivermectin.
Hospital Treatment: Four large RCT’s, 4 well designed OCT’s, total amount of patients
studied approach 3,000, and almost all show large and statistically significant reductions in
mortality when treated with ivermectin.
Overall mortality was significantly lower for the ivermectin group (15%) compared to the usual treatment group (25.2%) using figures from the unmatched cohort.
Mortality for the subgroup of patients who had severe pulmonary involvement was lower in the ivermectin treatment group (38.8%) compared to the usual treatment group (80.7%) from the unmatched cohort.
There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups regarding successful extubation rates of mechanically ventilated patients. Successful extubation is when the patient has had the breathing tube that has been used for mechanical ventilation removed and they can successfully breath on their own.
Length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the ivermectin treatment group and the regular treatment group.
For secondary analysis of the results propensity score matching was performed, which is when the researcher matches a person in the treatment group to a person in the non-treatment group who has similar characteristics. This reduces the effects of confounding and selection bias.
For the propensity matched cohort figures the mortality was significantly lower in the ivermectin treatment group compared to the regular treatment group (13.3% vs 24.5%; odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.99; P < .05).
Cool, I’ll add this to my shelf, next to the fish tank cleaner that has hydroxychloroquine in it.
Anybody who gets medical advice from somebody who isn’t a physician usually ends up getting exactly what they paid for. Especially after both veterinarians and the CDC have warned against using horse dewormer for COVID.
But hey, if you like to live your life without warning labels, and with your ass on fire, have at it.
The groups you referenced claim hydroxycloquine is extremely dangerous. Anyone who trusts sources that deny facts is asking for trouble.
Bro, medical science says that drugs which are safe for 70 years are no longer safe when you have a narrative to push.
Same can be said for anyone who takes medical advice from a website using Comic Sans: https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1586882#i
You do realize that the fish tank cleaner HCQ was fake news right? The woman poisoned her husband and used that excuse as cover.
https://news.yahoo.com/woman-blamed-trump-giving-her-133613382.html
I know you're trolling for downvotes but here. Dr. Kory Homeland Security Committee Meeting: Focus on Early Treatment of COVID-19 .
https://archive.is/Rh7m1
Overall mortality was significantly lower for the ivermectin group (15%) compared to the usual treatment group (25.2%) using figures from the unmatched cohort. Mortality for the subgroup of patients who had severe pulmonary involvement was lower in the ivermectin treatment group (38.8%) compared to the usual treatment group (80.7%) from the unmatched cohort.
There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups regarding successful extubation rates of mechanically ventilated patients. Successful extubation is when the patient has had the breathing tube that has been used for mechanical ventilation removed and they can successfully breath on their own. Length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the ivermectin treatment group and the regular treatment group. For secondary analysis of the results propensity score matching was performed, which is when the researcher matches a person in the treatment group to a person in the non-treatment group who has similar characteristics. This reduces the effects of confounding and selection bias.
For the propensity matched cohort figures the mortality was significantly lower in the ivermectin treatment group compared to the regular treatment group (13.3% vs 24.5%; odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.99; P < .05).