You need 2 to tango. You need 2 to fight. You also need 2 sides of a race war. Pick ANY side of a race war and you already fell into the "divide and conquer" plan of the NWO globalists.
Genesis 1:27 - So God created man in his [own] image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Romans 10:12 - For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
If one side is going for a race war and the other isn't, then that's just a genocide, isn't it?
Exactly dude.
Looks more like suicide than genocide but ya. Endangered species celebrating their replacement.
So you think picking the "white side" improves the situation?
This is the school teacher's level of stupidity.
Two don't fight if one doesn't want to... evidently otherwise you get beaten up.
Statistics don't lie...
I can manufacture statistics.
Give me control of the central banks for a few centuries and I guarantee you I can make Asians the "most oppressed minority" and blacks successful. Statistically speaking. Ever read the Art of War?
Do you think humans were born this way or society was manufactured this way? How come black parenthood went down from like 75% to like 15% in the last few decades? Extrapolate that fact back and see where blacks were before today's Tel-a-vision programming.
IMO our society was divided and conquered a LONG time ago. We live in a society so far away from the bible it's literally unrecognizable.
Schools shame sexually conservative individuals. Murder is praised on the radio.
Teens reply to their parents "ok boomer" instead of honoring them.
People are treated based on their skill color.
We have to prove our innocence to the government instead of it proving us guilty.
ETC ETC.
If you wanna claim society is fucked up except for its take on race you got a lot of data to provide before then xD
Would just ignoring those that OFFEND you and moving on be too hard?
Lol nothing offends me, but I am ok with you projecting your weak mind into me.
How would you feel if some BLM loser takes screenshots of this website and posts them on their black twitter or whatever and then everyone is hating on "racist whites"? Did it help you to post racist things? Did it help me? Did it help our movement?
Or did it just made you feel good about the confirmation bias that you have been conditioned to believe?
There is nothing wrong with talking about race in a pragmatic way. Race is real and there are differences between them. We live in a fallen world.
Romans 10:12 is talking about how we are all one in Christ Jesus. Obviously we are different in the flesh. Women are not the same as men, a man is not the same as his son, his son is not the same as his daughter, the old is not the same as the young, the smart is not the same as the dumb. There are differences between us, and we must acknowledge that. There is nothing un-Christian about it. If you are Catholic even the Catechism speaks of this.
It's natural to have an in-group preference with your own people. If you want proof just look at the lunchtables in highschool...
How is race real other than amount of melanin and other insignificant "differences"
John 7:24 - Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.
1 Samuel 16:7 - But the LORD said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for [the LORD seeth] not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart.
John 7:24, Jesus is talking about circumcision and how it's not necessary anymore. Point to me where God says race is not real and there is no such things as race and all people should mix together in one country.
1 Samuel 16:7 clearly states that God looks in our hearts and man looks at the outward appearance. Like Jesus said, we are all one in Christ, but our flesh has differences that is out of our control.
You realize after the Tower of Babel, God divided all the peoples into different nations with their people and twisted their tongues to speak different languages.
I recommend you read a book called The Bell Curve. Lots of good information in there. It's not racist to acknowledge hard truths. That's the difference between liberals and conservatives. One side accepts easy lies, the other is wiling to face the harsh reality of this fallen world. I pray that Jesus Christ guides you on your journey.
How about the founding fathers, do they think that all men are different?
James Madison “To be consistent with existing and probably unalterable prejudices in the U.S. freed blacks ought to be permanently removed beyond the region occupied by or allotted to a White population.” Letter from James Madison to Robert J. Evans, June 15, 1819, Writings 8:439–47.
John Dickinson believed homogeneity was crucial to the strength of America. "Where was there ever a confederacy of republics united as these states are…or, in which the people were so drawn together by religion, blood, language, manners, and customs?" “Observations on the Constitution Proposed by the Federal Convention,” No. 8, by “Fabius” (John Dickinson).
Also, in the Federalist Papers. “Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people, a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs.”
After the Constitution was ratified in 1788, Americans had to decide who they would allow to become part of their new country. The very first citizenship law, passed in 1790, specified that only “free white persons” could be naturalized, and immigration laws designed to keep the country overwhelmingly white were repealed only recently with the 1965 immigration act which spawned mass immigration. Quoted in Brimelow, Alien Nation, p. xii.
Alexander Hamilton was suspicious even of European immigrants, writing that “the influx of foreigners must, therefore, tend to produce a heterogeneous compound; to change and corrupt the national spirit; to complicate and confound public opinion; to introduce foreign propensities.” Quoted Grant and Davison, The Founders of the Republic on Immigration, Naturalization, and Aliens, p. 52.
The founding fathers were wise enough to acknowledge that race is a real thing, and has been a real thing since the beginning of mankind. They did not hate other races or individuals simply based on the color of their skin, but they understood that there were group differences between the races.
Nice cherry picking. They were so worried about homogenous country that they allowed millions of slaves to come from Africa to help build this country xD
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790
1 Are you really using that as your moral compass? 2 if you can read after a few lines it says freed slaves could become citizens. Probably in the republican states.
Fuck joggers.
That is all.
Do what you gotta do man. It's still a free country atm.
Jews are cheap. Puerto Ricans steal. Asians can't drive.
This is for you for some thicker skin training. https://youtu.be/5_1Ki3D5ztQ
Highly recommended show.
Side Note: before Jeudeo-Christian values it was Jeudeo-Greek values....
IMO stereotyping are for weak minds.
For example, Jesus would treat everyone as the purest form of an individual.
Big tech companies attempt to do the same. They search for your PERSONAL preferences such as words you put into a search engine, hobbies, etc.
On the other extreme of this spectrum we have people that think "all immigrants this", "all white people that",etc.
Somewhere in the middle we have the average IQ people that say "not all white people, not all black people, not all muslims"
Our brains try to work as categories because categories are much easier to work with than many many individuals.
I trained myself to look at people as individuals and only judge by actions.
You can start with an easy challenge to undo everything you have been bombarded to think about race.
Any time you are driving and somebody cuts you off, tell yourself "that individual is such a bad driver" Catch up to the individual and see if their "demographic" matches what you had in mind.
"I bet a black teen" it was an old white grandpa. "I bet Asian man" It was a Hispanic lady. Very rarely you're going to guess correctly and this is just one way to constantly counter the propaganda that we are bombarded with.
^This at least works in big cities.
I had a black employee that stole a truck. After that I still hired many other black guys. If I had let that one individual get to me, my business would have suffered from my bias and many of the great workers we have today might not have been hired if I punished them for the actions of another individual.
IMO racism of both sides is weakness and I can see why both sides think they are right but they are both wrong IMO.
I agree more with Morgan Freeman, stop calling him a black man and he will stop calling you a white man.
Also, just so we are on the same page about language and brainwashing there are no humans that are actually black or actually white. It's shades of brown, beige, cream, etc. Just my opinion.
If you imagine an individual that might shoot you or beat and rob you, I think the assumption of what they might look like is a little more accurate.
I think there are LOTS of bad drivers. One demographic dominates the field in violent felonies, tho.
So? I just assume all strangers can be a threat to me. What's the point of me being sketched out by black people and then I get taken out by a white dude while my guard is down?
Once again I treat everyone the same and I will assume everyone is a threat until I know them better.
Irrelevant point as far as I'm concerned.
You are walking down the street at midnight in a bad part of town. Walking towards you is a ninety year old white female and a nineteen year old black male. Are you going to focus your guard equally against both of them? If so you are not virtuous, you are stupid. Knowing that black males aged 18-35 commit 50% of violent crime in America is not racist, it is an objective factual statistic. Do you HATE that young man because he is black? No, that would be racist. Do you understand that he is magnitudes more likely to cause harm to you than the old white lady? Yes, that is called objective reasoning. You are using the left's definition of racism which is why you and your argument are wrong.
Exactly — even Jesse Jackson made that accurate observation.
Well, you are the wise one I guess. Good luck!
Sure. Identity politics is lazy and divisive. But groups are just a collection of individuals, so different groups will have different breakdowns of individuals and patterns emerge.
Black crime isn't a race issue, it's a gang/drug/cultural issue. But it's been "racist" to talk about for soooo long, it's a become a race issue because only their neighborhood was never addressed.
Plus banter is the path to peace. My group of friends had all the Diversity because none of the other White kids would swap racist jokes with them as equals. Online trends of making fun of each other's stereotypes brings us closer as a species.
We aren't all clones and pretending we are all the same is part of what divides us.
We are all sons and daughters of God.
I don't know if we are clones of each other but more like brothers or sisters. I do not see my brothers and sisters different by factors that they had no say in: country of birth, height, skin color, etc.
Judging is not my job, when I have to, I stick to personal decisions only.
Did you pull a gun on a cop? skin color irrelevant.
Did you get a phD in physics? Skin color irrelevant.
Different doesn't mean better/worse.
Humans evolved differently depending on environment. Different value systems developed in different parts of the world. Nothing wrong with that, just different.
Islam is not Christianity. Roman history is not the same as Egyptian history. Even diet and how we stayed warm in the winter can create differences between societies.
Some people take great offense to being treated as just a White Christian with darker skin as if their cultural history is identical to Western/Christian history.
I dont really see a logical point anywhere in there.
First, " different doesn't mean worse/better" can you name 2 different cars that are not better or worse? Or 2 athletes?
Human evolution is irrelevant to my point unless you dont believe in God then we're wasting time with this debate.
Even the history of those empires was not determined by 98% of the populations of those empires. It was determined by their rulers. Invasions, conquering, etc.
A good Egyptian that sells flowers in a market 3,000 years ago is basically the same a good Mexican that sells flowers today in Mexico. Why? Because regardless of history, evolution, climate, etc both INDIVIDUALS decided to be a part of the free market and trade their labor/skills for wealth and therefore helping build society. (As opposed to robbers, politicians, central bankers, etc.
Rock climber vs boxer. Which is the better athlete? Or are the both better/worse in their own way?
God isn't a child playing with legos. Evolution is part of his miracle of life. Are all of your kids the same? Why would God's children all be the same? What's the point of sending us to be tested if we will all be identical with identical lives and identical challenges?
What's morally "good" in egypt is the same as what's morally "good" in mexico. There's certainly some overlap across cultures but also some significant differences.
We all aren't working with the same moral compass.
I was asking about 2 athletes in the same sport but sure we'll go with your take. Here's ranking of sports by difficulty. Boxing is #1, rock climibing nowhere to be seen. http://www.espn.com/espn/page2/sportSkills
Do you love one of your kids more than the others?
Which commandments are morally good in Egypt but not in Mexico or vice versa?
So no criticizing China or Islam then?
Chinese government yes we can criticize. Do you blame Chinese individuals for the actions of its government? If so, it's Your fault that the USA bombed like 7 countries during Obama.
Same thing with Islam. Its not an individual so I do not blame all muslims for the actions of a Muslim church.
However, I do blame complacency though. So if a muslim is unable to call out a terrorist then he is in some way complicit with the crime.
When I say fuck China I mean the government. Realize that China has 1.3 Billion people. The most capitalist Chinese people are more capitalistic than you are and it's not their fault they popped out of their mom in an arbitrary geographical point where a tyrannical government seeks to control all aspects of life.
Yes.
Agreed. We should never have allowed tyranny to breed here.
Our inaction is what caused the mess we are in.
Well if the actions of your government are under your control, are the actions of the neighboring government also in your control? Are you responsible for what Mexico does? How about the United Nations? All countries are represented there. Are you responsible for the actions that the UN takes globally?
Or perhaps we are only responsible for our individual decisions and the people that bombed the middle east are responsible themselves.
No. I am a citizen of the USA.
I am not Mexican.
The Mexicans are responsible for Mexico.
If you have a point then please make it because this discussion is getting silly.
Nice dodge of the UN question.
I dodged nothing - your argument has become so feeble that soon you'll literally be blaming the cause and effect fluttering of a butterfly's wings on starting world wars.