2380
()
posted ago by pogilby ago by pogilby +2381 / -1
Comments (85)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
7
VikingHalo45 7 points ago +7 / -0

Secede from what? The ghetto Blue Cities that dominate each state?

3
MAGA_MEXICAN_CHILI 3 points ago +3 / -0

From what is happening in Oregon. Blue Cities will have less control if secession happens by county.

Its easier to isolate these 'havens' of liberals when the whole is fundimentally strong. Also to note, conservatives out breed liberals. So give it 2-3 generations and those cities eventually will be red if they havent left already.

0
VikingHalo45 0 points ago +1 / -1

Dems run the entie city, state, and counties that NY, LA, Chicago, ATL are in. Their folk outbread ours easily.

2
MAGA_MEXICAN_CHILI 2 points ago +2 / -0

They only outbreed us because of the gibs. You take away the gibs/gibmedats and the breeding halts itself.

You dont give weeds plant food, you give them plant killer.

-1
RichardNoggin -1 points ago +1 / -2

If you think the majority blue population in the cities of any state are going to vote to allow counties to leave then I've got a bridge to sell you. They will never give up the delicious control they have over ANYBODY.

2
MAGA_MEXICAN_CHILI 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think you're missing the point, just cough up those black pills really quick and think.

A new country with control of the borders, keeping any and all immigration into the area to a trickle. It would eventually starve out these blue cities. You also would have massive reforms to the entitlement programs that would also destroy the cities inability to keep people on the plantation.

1
RichardNoggin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd never deny the beauty of such an occurrence in simply pointing out the utter impossibility of the big city voters allowing counties to leave their state

1
HeavyMetalPatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

They will never give up the delicious control they have over ANYBODY.

That's where the 100M people with 300M guns and 20B rounds says "we are leaving peacefully, choose your response carefully." When I say SECESSION can be achieved peacefully, I don't mean there won't be guns on the table during the final negotiation.

1
RichardNoggin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm talking about voting my guy, within a state. So you want counties within a state to go hot if the cities vote against them? Just want to be clear here. That sounds a bit untenable

3
HeavyMetalPatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

You're right, but we can't save those states. The only states that can flee are the red states with mostly red cities. Patriots need to move to those states and create a new nation. Together we stand.

4
Isolated_Patriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're right, but we can't save those states.

You missed the "each state" part. Every state has communist footholds of millions to tens of millions dominated by pro-xiden anti-Trump politics. Even if we pull off succession, the "new confederacy" is half dead in the water.

1
HeavyMetalPatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

The concept is there is 1 year transition period. Everybody who wants to move, makes their move. Thus, blue people in red states and red people in blue states switch where they live. Or just accept their fate. Most will move because our cultures are so incompatible now.

2
WatchMaga 2 points ago +2 / -0

When India split from Pakistan, the Muslims marched out of the subcontinent.

2
Robiscore98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tbf New England is mostly blue (75-80%) of counties at least so can we cut them off from the rest of the country. Everything north of DC should be nuked beyond oblivion.

Coming from a NYC pede