I just hope one day someone gets on Cox news and talks about the Holodomor.this will cause some conservatives to start noticing things.I don’t get how many pedes here are still naive after all we have tried to tell them.
Look into the rebellions on haiti when they exterminated the whites... they exterminated the "free coloreds" after. Meaning that the haitians murdered any person with any white blood in them at all. All the half caste, mixed race citizens were brutally murdered because of the color of their skin, even though they were also oppressed by the French government and weren't allowed land ownership or the right to vote. This is exactly what they are trying to do to america. There will always be a poor, lesser class that wants what the people at the top have. And there will always be people seeking to take advantage of that.
Yea and it will never drop until whitey is completely gone. Soon it will turn into "Why do the minority whites have ______"? And it will go on and on and on until America is overrun with low IQ individuals who can easily be controlled. No empire has lasted forever. America will lose its #1 geopolitical superpower spot in less than 40 years and maybe quicker to China/Russia
At long as the Military/FBI doesn't start rounding people up. Just need to sit back and watch White Liberals in the cities destroy themselves with their own Diversity. Then we just let those Crab Buckets do their thing, like Detroit. Stuck forever.
Jan 6th. Some stood up and EVERYONE turned on them. Like it or not, more need to be on our side. Maybe Conservatives can't save us because the Left will unify against Conservatives no matter what. So we have to wait for the Left to have another Communist vs Fascist civil war.
Well, I've done more for my community than you've done for yours I suspect. Built a private school inside a church. Funded the extension of a church to add room for middle school and high school students. I bought a printing press, I have several businesses also involved, silent of course. My entire community of like-minded white people are pooling their money and resources into something we can build on. What have you done? Like I said, probably nothing. You're pissed because you sit around and do nothing as the walls close in around you. Your freedoms slowly being chipped away from you, and yet here you are, doing nothing, just bitching about people on the internet. What a winner you are...
Sounds like it. When do preemptive strikes on these people begin? They openly call for the extermination of hundreds of millions of people and it’s treated as normal.
You'll be waiting a long time, fren. White, Western culture has been the defining driver for most every major (and minor) achievement for a very long time.
There is nothing wrong with acknowledging your individual superiority with regards to a talent, ability, or skill set based on merit in comparison to other people. But:
there is nothing superior about one's complexion (or sex or ethnicity); different, but not superior (aka. I'm not superior at things because I'm white; I'm superior compared to some people in some skill areas because I worked at them and perhaps have a talent for said skills...and a lot of people are superior to me for the same reasons, and there are things I'm not very good at all with that others are.)
nobody is (or should be) superior to others in the eyes of the law (and one could argue in the eyes of God and in the rules of civil society)...a lot of people seem to forget this one
I think people either stupidly or disingenuously believe some people unironically think skin color to be the sole reason to justify their views on race, and not actually the common characteristic that precedes genetic/cultural differences that if benchmarked with theirs, proves to be inferior and/or not fit to couple with theirs.
What's written above does not snuff the possibility of kindness, intelligence, innovation, and a lithany of things that makes Humans great, in their culture. That's the common lefty-drone schtick. What it does, is indicate that these cultures cannot merge with ours without friction and disaster, something nobody wants, with exception those that seek power and money in a cheap and villanous way, such as creating artificial division, and fearmongering to such extent where they conveniently swoop in waving their "antidote" at the apex of the conflict, with the catch of being elected, otherwise we can't be "saved".
Genetics isn't culture; we've got plenty of evidence to back that up. And that still doesn't negate the dictum that states "equal under the law".
I don't get to go and harm somebody for criminal reasons, unprovoked because I'm from a different culture than they are.
Similarly, while I believe I come from a more advanced culture than say a Kalahari bushman (and with some evidence to back that up), nonetheless their culture has likely better enabled them to survive in the Kalahari desert (and that's ok; I've not got any real desire to go survive in the Kalahari desert; they may have no real desire to engage in my cultural milieu either....they might have a point with the drag queen story hour, to be honest). I can't help but notice that the Kalahari bushmen are not the ones who created Cardi B, and America/Americans have.
Although I do agree to some extent that cultures can and do have friction points when they come into contact with one another -- sometimes greater, sometimes lesser (although we'd probably disagree on cultures -- I'm firmly of the opinion that the "cultures" the Western world is having a problem with right now are pretty much as a result of the Western world -- we're not having a Kalahari bushman culture problem, for example).
Never said it was, so your point is... well pointless.
I don't get to go and harm somebody for criminal reasons, unprovoked because I'm from a different culture than they are.
A strawman. An individual, or a few, merge with the culture through the means of adaptation, they lose theirs, or force the bits that are incompatible out so they can be succesfully merge their mother, and host cultures.
When cultures clash into violence, it's because there's enough dissenting mass to enable phyical hostilities, through peer pressure, constant brain siege by listening to people hate on the opposed culture, and belief that theirs is superior. This is obvious because we don't remove superiority from our lives, it's stupid.
Similarly, while I believe I come from a more advanced culture than say a Kalahari bushman (and with some evidence to back that up), nonetheless their culture has likely better enabled them to survive in the Kalahari desert (and that's ok; I've not got any real desire to go survive in the Kalahari desert; they may have no real desire to engage in my cultural milieu either....they might have a point with the drag queen story hour, to be honest). I can't help but notice that the Kalahari bushmen are not the ones who created Cardi B, and America/Americans have.
As i previously said, if you benchmark the cultures and compare them to the micrometer, can you honestly say that a western/mediterranean/asian man will lose against a kalahari man? If you drop them in the middle of the desert they'll die, obviously, JUST as the kalahari man would, but put into a life of desert they'd survive, just like your model. In modern society? those races i mentioned have a ridiculously higher chance to not only survive, but thrive.
Play this game so that you don't admit outright that races do play a part; If you were to form a colony on a different planet, would you bring your kalahari man, or a random modernized man? The logical part of your brain will take the controversial answer, why? Because it subconsciously wants to live.
Although I do agree to some extent that cultures can and do have friction points when they come into contact with one another -- sometimes greater, sometimes lesser (although we'd probably disagree on cultures -- I'm firmly of the opinion that the "cultures" the Western world is having a problem with right now are pretty much as a result of the Western world -- we're not having a Kalahari bushman culture problem, for example).
The answer to this is in the second sentence "Sometimes greater, sometimes lesser" And the answer to that? It's because there's not many friction points. A western American man would work really well with a western French man. Different cultures, but almost 0 to none friction points. As per your kalahari bushmen culture problem, they may not have many, but they sure are warring amongst eachother, more so thatn western, mediterranean and asian countries.
No, I brought up the argument of the Kalahari bushman because I wanted to point out a very good example of differing cultures (with a racial component) to make two points (that would back up MY argument):
people are superior only within the context of their millieu; aka. what they're good at (and my original post was stressing individual superiority of merit, but no matter, down this rabbit hole I willingly travelled); I could bring it back to individual merit as well -- people tend to be good at what they have a talent for and especially at skills they have worked hard to develop; they are superior to others who have not.
However:
superiority does not confer higher privileges under the law (or it shouldn't -- that it does is one of the reasons we're having problems) -- we don't get to walk up to Mr. Bushman nor Mr. American not of my whatever and murder him for shits and giggles...they have rights too (or should have in a just, lawful, free society -- that this has taken a huge slide is one of the reasons we're having a problem).
And I don't know about working really well between a western American man (aren't they all?) and a western French man...the French soldiers used to drive my husband and his unit (some of whom had the same R1b as the French dudes, some of whom did not) fucking nuts when they did a train up together...something, something cultural differences in attitudes towards lunch breaks vs. mission goals...
PS. as for the "mission to Mars" -- that's all conjecture at this point; for all we both know both the Bushman and the European might have skill sets that could prove quite useful...hasn't been tried yet; we might find out in the future
You're wrong, because you're using the marxist definition of race. Race is not skin color, race is a genetically close group of the ethnicities. Skin color is just a convenient, albeit imperfect, phenotype that let's you gauge a person's race at a glance.
The part that you're missing that behavior and intelligence are genetic, and while you can't make assumptions about individuals, you can make assumptions about the population. We know that the last common ancestor between whites and Africans was 60,000 years ago, and that most human brain evolution occurred in the last 10,000 outside of Africa, due to the discovery of agriculture. In addition, we can see morphological and functional differences in brain scans. Africans have smaller prefrontal cortexes, and fewer cortical convolutions (indicating less processing power).
This is all in addition to behavioral we differences we observe, cross culturally. For example, Africans fail the mirror test until they are pretty old.
What you're saying is actually a form of creationism. Evolution is racist, it optimized the different races for the environments they evolved in. In Africa you don't need intelligence to survive, food is abundant and available year round. I. The north, it's not available for half the year, so you need to evolve to be very forward thinking and clever.
White people are better at living in modern societies because our ancestors already paid their dues in the past. There is a reason the Europeans found that Africans were still living in mud huts, and hadn't even discovered written language, while they were zipping around on sea faring wooden ships. We are better than them.
Ok, let's go with "genetically close group" -- there are people in Africa who are genetically more akin to European populations than they are to the rest of Africa (R1b in parts of Central Africa, look it up). That same haplogroup much lower in E. Europe (specifically, Ukraine).
Although I would most definitely agree that skin color is a very poor indication of "race", I don't think anyone wants to make the case that Cameroonians are more European than Ukrainians (maybe some might, who knows).
From there, I would once again posit that neither skin color nor genetic haplogroup affiliation has very much to do with culture -- which can have many variations within both similar skin pigmentations as well as genetic affiliations (Swedes and Swiss are not 100% alike culturally, even if they may look very similar and have very similar genetics, as an example).
And I'm not the one trying to make the "better than them" argument -- I'm just pointing out that no one should be considered better than in the eyes of the law...which IS a marxist/socialist construct ("four legs good; two legs bad; some pigs are better than others" -- no thanks; I don't want to live under that social code).
You're talking a single measure of closeness, which is not a valid argument. Haven't you wondered how gene testing companies like 23andMe are able to determine your ethnicity and race? In the last 10 years, due to advancement in gene testing, we actually can determine (almost down to the region) where you came from due to correlations in alleles and such. You can see such clustering even when examining only a few alleles, here is just one such example https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Plots-of-genetic-similarity-according-to-Eigenstrat-derived-PCA-based-axes-of-genetic_fig1_225095386.
What you're missing, and what most libertarian types need to understand, is that your personality and behavioral profile is mostly determined by the time you are born. Culture is a reflection of genetic predisposition, not an overlay on top of it. The ones asserting that culture create differences in behavior are making the same "blank slate" argument that liberals make when they assert that gender is a social construct.
I'm just pointing out that no one should be considered better than in the eyes of the law...which IS a marxist/socialist construct
Racism is actually a biological construct; being a racist just means that you recognize that evolution is real. And lastly, being equal under the law, doesn't mean equal. At some point you have to ask yourself, are the people that are good making up for those who are not? And when it comes to Africans, the answer is a resounding no. They shouldn't be harmed, but if we keep trying to accommodate them we are only going to destroy our own societies. They need to go back to Africa.
You're the one who brought it up; just responding!
"Libertarian type" -- haha! I'm sure the more "libertarian types" on this board just love the fact that you called me that (seriously, they and I have had arguments with each other before; don't think they'd call me that).
On that note: I don't deny the existence of racism, nor really with evolution (although I'm not without skepticism as to the myriad of theories regarding it). I do however consider, as a person with some fondness for Christianity, both to be things appropriately countenanced with some deal of skepticism and caution -- I'm not down with a lot of what I've seen, not at all...from spiritual as well as scientific standpoints.
The Soviet Union pushed anti-racism as a means to undermining the United States...what they actually did in their own society was a different matter altogether. In fact, one could argue that eugenics (a construct with very racist underpinnings in addition to class-ist ones) has always been part and parcel of any socialist movement. In short, they're racist af. They love segregating people off into categories!
"They need to go back to Africa": who? and more to the point -- where in Africa? (it isn't a monolithic place: genetically, racially, genetically, linguistically...culturally). And, why just "them"? I for one would dearly love to send white American leftists back to Europe (anything to get them the fuck out of my backyard) ...but that's perhaps a bit unfair to Europeans; selfish if you will...and where would be a whole other issue.
The Soviet Union pushed anti-racism as a means to undermining the United States...what they actually did in their own society was a different matter altogether.
This is completely untrue, and shows a significant lack of historical understanding. The soviets believed in anti-racism because they believed in Lysenkioism, which is an outright denial of natural selection. They believed in it so deeply they even allowed their own crops to fail, and their people to starve, in order to keep up the facade that it was correct. They also didn't divide by race at all, only class. They were even the first to allow women in their military and secret police, because they thought that men and women were basically the same. And it also had nothing to do with the US at all; this all happened long before there was any real tension between the soviets and the US.
"They need to go back to Africa": who?
Uh, all African Americans? I suspect back to the Ivory Coast, which is where almost all slaves originated from, but frankly I don't care where.
"The soviets believed in anti-racism because they believed in Lysenkioism, which is an outright denial of natural selection."
The victims of numerous "ethnic cleansings" (which was really taking the idea of "races" of people to an extreme) are alas no longer available for comment.
You do know what the primary tenet of Lysenkoism is, correct? In a nutshell that acquired traits can become hereditary -- which is pretty damn, well, racist. My genes have definitely given me my height, certain immunities/weaknesses to certain diseases, even my skin/hair/eye color, and yes has factored into my IQ (although there could be a great debate to be had for just how valuable IQ is in the making of success or even a good citizen -- some might say individual character does play a significant role, I tend to agree with that)...but it has not conferred any ability whatsoever to build a ship...or sing opera.
Why should every African American be compelled to go to Africa? Culturally they wouldn't fit in as they weren't raised in any of those cultures; genetically they wouldn't either (most of them carry a significant European genetic footprint). And maybe they would just prefer to stay where they were originally from; there's that reason. Oh, wait, surely you don't believe (since you don't believe racism = skin color) that all people who have Sub-Saharan African features belong to a particular race (as you described it -- genetic proximity, not skin color)? Well, whatever you do, don't put them in Cameroon or Germany unless you do a genetic workup and find they've got R1b!
Eugenics was big in the US long before the USSR or Third Reich. From forcible sterilization to Planned Parenthood targeting whatever they deemed unfit (Margaret Sanger was a notorious racist).
because its factually incorrect and sets up a community of such thinkers for failure.
If you teach such mindset to younger generations, they grow up thinking they don't need to try as hard to compete in anything, and they start blaming any failure, comparative to the 'lesser' people on circumstances rather than themselves.
Better instead to teach that your lineage and heritage are valuable and that value deserves effort to persevere, endure and excel.
Bankers were making money hand over fist with their liar loans and the real estate bubble. And when it came crashing down the big guys got free TARP money and acquired distressed properties.
The truth is that blacks love victim good.it is the same thing in Uk,Brazil and Canada.Arabs and Persians also complained about blacks;it is only whites who are going against human nature.
I was thinking yesterday about how CRT and the entire hysterical conversation about "whiteness" has arisen something in me that I can only call a sort of defensive white supremacy. As in I was more than happy to treat everyone well and criticize actual racism when I saw it and generally not spend my time thinking about all this shit, but once I was called "evil" for my race and had it suggested that the world would somehow be better off if white people had never been here, that got me thinking "Fuck that. All we did was invent democracy, and penicillin, and computers, and smart phones, and automobiles, and damn near everything else."
Imagine a world where white people never existed. Where would the rest of the world be today? Would they have reached the industrial revolution yet? Do CTR morons honestly think Africa would have reached interstellar travel had Europe not colonized it six hundred years ago?
White people are the shit. I say this without wishing ill on any other race, but we are fucking great and have made the most contributions to technology that have benefited all races. I guess that makes me a "white supremacist," but it doesn't make me a bad person.
The propagation of Critical Race Theory religion in our society today is a key tool used by the globalists' & Marxists' for destabilization.
Remember, We the People greatly outnumber the enemy in so many ways, and we have yet to show our true strength (doubtful that we ever will, though).
When you're greatly outnumbered, how do you get a tactical advantage? Sneakily, by taking over key infrastructure (education, the media, tech) and using it to turn the spotlight off of you and fracturing your enemy into warring sub-groups.
Hence, the push for Critical Race Theory religion. We the People—regardless of race or creed—unified as Americans against the globalist threat is terrifying to them. But we are all under assault by their lies, instead, and focused on each other: blacks given a mirage of oppression, so that some actually believe it and lash out against whites; whites feel under assault in return, so they view blacks negatively. The rhetoric escalates, as we see in this article, and the division gets wider and wider while the globalists continue to gain more tactical advantages despite their small size.
If there is anything I've learned about CRT and the culture wars in general is that a lot of it is a paper tiger. The adherents of this religion are small in number and only large in prominence, propped up by those seized institutions, such as higher ed, the media, and tech. A lot of your fellow Americans, regardless of skin color, do not care. If anything, most are scared to speak out (or face "cancellation" or worse).
I share the feelings you have in your comment. How could you not when you're under assault like this? But remember... the fog of war is real, and reality is constantly being warped. What to do? Return to your core values and let them guide you. You and I know that it is America (and Americans) first. We judge base on the content of one's character, not some "identity markers." We cannot abandon those critical values now and play into the hands of the globalists. Our energies need to be on purging the CRT religion from our institutions as it is not only anti-American, but anti-human. People are not the issue here; a sick ideology is, and it is trying to turn Americans against each other.
I agree with Mr. Woods. There has been a war ongoing against whites for some time now. The Marxists want to turn the US into South Africa. There is a reason none of the DNCMSM ever reports on what is going on there as it is a genocide of whites especially white farms. Whites are being discriminated against. Many blacks and coloreds (as they are called there) lose their jobs when white farmers are murdered. If we don't stand up for our race, we will become SA sooner rather than later esp with the Demtard push to get rid of our 2A. This is part of the reason why we have open borders allowing hordes of economic illegal aliens to invade our country. We have enough of our own people struggling especially after a year of this PLANdemic which was, among other things, deployed to destroy small businesses across the US.
If white people do not start fighting back immediately, we are going to find ourselves in one of the worst imaginable situations. These people think that In order to have a utopia, white people need to die. It's pushed by our government, and our government hates us. If white people do not figure out a way to combat this immediately, we are dead. I say 30,000 to 50,000 white males need to invade a country. Afterwards, the rest of our white brothers and sisters can meet us there.
What's keeping us from invading other countries like we used to? Nothing. Smart, healthy white men with formidable fighting skills, weapons and ammunition could easily take over a small country. Think about it. I honestly don't think there's any saving America. The only way that our white race, culture and way of life can live on is if we start our own country by means of colonization. They call us colonizers for a reason. I suggest every single one of you and get in touch with the thought that the only way out of this, and the only way to survive is through colonization.
Which country? Europe is fucked.Antarctica is too cold and it won’t contain everyone.the only hope is whites in Latin America and whites in North America joining hands and creating a bigger nation than USA.
Giving up America would make things worse.Our forefathers built this nation and they would be ashamed at all conservatives especially those who believe in civic nationalism.
I was thinking Panama. We don't have to just conform to one country. There are Pacific Island chains, Greenland, Europe is fucked and nobody wants to fight for it. America will die when whites leave and we can take it back by force.
Find advertisers on their page, contact them with selectively edited snippets from the Root saying "you support writers that openly call for genocide?"
Woke cancel culture is a plague weaponized against liberty, but it is effective. Use it against them.
And they say we are inciting violence by just saying we want a proper audit of the election results and will not accept the false results they are claiming when they are literally saying to go kill people.
Politician and activist Tom Hayden gave a doozy of a speech...especially congratulating his son on marrying a black woman (It’s “another step in a long-term goal of [his]: the peaceful, nonviolent disappearance of the white race”)
During her speech, Fonda talked about being a neglectful mother and then spoke about how “Native Americans had once lived where we were now and how her ancestors had sailed from Holland to New York.”
Hayden's goal is probably shared by much of the Coastal Elite
They keep up this rhetoric and they'll see what right wing extremism really is. Right wing death squads in every shithole of a neighborhood. Keep it up lol. They're only fanning the flames of the fire that will consume them.
2 lies being told there, as viruses that wipe out their hosts quickly/entirely, also wipe themselves out, and thus is not beneficial for the propagation of the virus
What the NYT is saying is that, if theres no one for the white supremacists to kill, then the white supremacists die. So both white supremacists and their victims must die. "Liquidating our assests. Everything must go"
Is the #NYTimes supporting racial genocide? The answer is yes. Yes they are. There is nothing the New York Times like more than death and murder and genocide. This is what they feed on. Don't believe me? Go back and read through any single edition ever published...
If not actively endorsed it it's tacitly encouraged it. A star journalist there covered for Stalin as the latter starved civilians. The Times barely mentioned Nazi atrocities.
it didn't say "white supremacy..."
it said "whiteness..."
even worse.
Completely ignoring the FBI crime stats.
If this propaganda continues it will be worse than what Germany did to the jews
It's funny because the NYT was started by jews and you still think they're the biggest victims in history because they get to write the narrative.
I just hope one day someone gets on Cox news and talks about the Holodomor.this will cause some conservatives to start noticing things.I don’t get how many pedes here are still naive after all we have tried to tell them.
Nothing is worse than those lies, everything they do is based on them
We went from "be less white" to "there should be less whites" very quickly.
Excellent comment. Look no further than music and television.
White Genocide is real
The original article from The Root: https://archive.is/yqj1D
It's pretty vile.
Full of dog whistles, blaming all the world's ills today and 30 years from now on white people.
From another work by the author:
No wonder he's bitter: he's a Communist.
Wait til Kill Whites turns into Kill White-ish. Much smaller number, less armed, and easier to fit into camps.
Identity Politics sure are helpful.
Look into the rebellions on haiti when they exterminated the whites... they exterminated the "free coloreds" after. Meaning that the haitians murdered any person with any white blood in them at all. All the half caste, mixed race citizens were brutally murdered because of the color of their skin, even though they were also oppressed by the French government and weren't allowed land ownership or the right to vote. This is exactly what they are trying to do to america. There will always be a poor, lesser class that wants what the people at the top have. And there will always be people seeking to take advantage of that.
Yea and it will never drop until whitey is completely gone. Soon it will turn into "Why do the minority whites have ______"? And it will go on and on and on until America is overrun with low IQ individuals who can easily be controlled. No empire has lasted forever. America will lose its #1 geopolitical superpower spot in less than 40 years and maybe quicker to China/Russia
Journalism sounds pretty whiteish to me. Marxists should start with them
At long as the Military/FBI doesn't start rounding people up. Just need to sit back and watch White Liberals in the cities destroy themselves with their own Diversity. Then we just let those Crab Buckets do their thing, like Detroit. Stuck forever.
That takes too long. We need to do something now, not wait it out like inept fucking retards.
Jan 6th. Some stood up and EVERYONE turned on them. Like it or not, more need to be on our side. Maybe Conservatives can't save us because the Left will unify against Conservatives no matter what. So we have to wait for the Left to have another Communist vs Fascist civil war.
Either way, prepare for the hard times coming.
Or just go on wild bitch rants online like... you
Well, I've done more for my community than you've done for yours I suspect. Built a private school inside a church. Funded the extension of a church to add room for middle school and high school students. I bought a printing press, I have several businesses also involved, silent of course. My entire community of like-minded white people are pooling their money and resources into something we can build on. What have you done? Like I said, probably nothing. You're pissed because you sit around and do nothing as the walls close in around you. Your freedoms slowly being chipped away from you, and yet here you are, doing nothing, just bitching about people on the internet. What a winner you are...
You shut your mouth, scum. I'm saving the entire human race.
You have the originality of a cum sock.
Sounds like it. When do preemptive strikes on these people begin? They openly call for the extermination of hundreds of millions of people and it’s treated as normal.
Come on, Woods
Help us fight faux news by archiving links
Can anybody please explain why it's bad to think you are superior to other people?
I am waiting for non-whites to explain why they think that they are superior.
You'll be waiting a long time, fren. White, Western culture has been the defining driver for most every major (and minor) achievement for a very long time.
There is nothing wrong with acknowledging your individual superiority with regards to a talent, ability, or skill set based on merit in comparison to other people. But:
there is nothing superior about one's complexion (or sex or ethnicity); different, but not superior (aka. I'm not superior at things because I'm white; I'm superior compared to some people in some skill areas because I worked at them and perhaps have a talent for said skills...and a lot of people are superior to me for the same reasons, and there are things I'm not very good at all with that others are.)
nobody is (or should be) superior to others in the eyes of the law (and one could argue in the eyes of God and in the rules of civil society)...a lot of people seem to forget this one
I think people either stupidly or disingenuously believe some people unironically think skin color to be the sole reason to justify their views on race, and not actually the common characteristic that precedes genetic/cultural differences that if benchmarked with theirs, proves to be inferior and/or not fit to couple with theirs.
What's written above does not snuff the possibility of kindness, intelligence, innovation, and a lithany of things that makes Humans great, in their culture. That's the common lefty-drone schtick. What it does, is indicate that these cultures cannot merge with ours without friction and disaster, something nobody wants, with exception those that seek power and money in a cheap and villanous way, such as creating artificial division, and fearmongering to such extent where they conveniently swoop in waving their "antidote" at the apex of the conflict, with the catch of being elected, otherwise we can't be "saved".
Genetics isn't culture; we've got plenty of evidence to back that up. And that still doesn't negate the dictum that states "equal under the law".
I don't get to go and harm somebody for criminal reasons, unprovoked because I'm from a different culture than they are.
Similarly, while I believe I come from a more advanced culture than say a Kalahari bushman (and with some evidence to back that up), nonetheless their culture has likely better enabled them to survive in the Kalahari desert (and that's ok; I've not got any real desire to go survive in the Kalahari desert; they may have no real desire to engage in my cultural milieu either....they might have a point with the drag queen story hour, to be honest). I can't help but notice that the Kalahari bushmen are not the ones who created Cardi B, and America/Americans have.
Although I do agree to some extent that cultures can and do have friction points when they come into contact with one another -- sometimes greater, sometimes lesser (although we'd probably disagree on cultures -- I'm firmly of the opinion that the "cultures" the Western world is having a problem with right now are pretty much as a result of the Western world -- we're not having a Kalahari bushman culture problem, for example).
Never said it was, so your point is... well pointless.
A strawman. An individual, or a few, merge with the culture through the means of adaptation, they lose theirs, or force the bits that are incompatible out so they can be succesfully merge their mother, and host cultures. When cultures clash into violence, it's because there's enough dissenting mass to enable phyical hostilities, through peer pressure, constant brain siege by listening to people hate on the opposed culture, and belief that theirs is superior. This is obvious because we don't remove superiority from our lives, it's stupid.
As i previously said, if you benchmark the cultures and compare them to the micrometer, can you honestly say that a western/mediterranean/asian man will lose against a kalahari man? If you drop them in the middle of the desert they'll die, obviously, JUST as the kalahari man would, but put into a life of desert they'd survive, just like your model. In modern society? those races i mentioned have a ridiculously higher chance to not only survive, but thrive.
Play this game so that you don't admit outright that races do play a part; If you were to form a colony on a different planet, would you bring your kalahari man, or a random modernized man? The logical part of your brain will take the controversial answer, why? Because it subconsciously wants to live.
The answer to this is in the second sentence "Sometimes greater, sometimes lesser" And the answer to that? It's because there's not many friction points. A western American man would work really well with a western French man. Different cultures, but almost 0 to none friction points. As per your kalahari bushmen culture problem, they may not have many, but they sure are warring amongst eachother, more so thatn western, mediterranean and asian countries.
No, I brought up the argument of the Kalahari bushman because I wanted to point out a very good example of differing cultures (with a racial component) to make two points (that would back up MY argument):
However:
And I don't know about working really well between a western American man (aren't they all?) and a western French man...the French soldiers used to drive my husband and his unit (some of whom had the same R1b as the French dudes, some of whom did not) fucking nuts when they did a train up together...something, something cultural differences in attitudes towards lunch breaks vs. mission goals...
PS. as for the "mission to Mars" -- that's all conjecture at this point; for all we both know both the Bushman and the European might have skill sets that could prove quite useful...hasn't been tried yet; we might find out in the future
You're wrong, because you're using the marxist definition of race. Race is not skin color, race is a genetically close group of the ethnicities. Skin color is just a convenient, albeit imperfect, phenotype that let's you gauge a person's race at a glance.
The part that you're missing that behavior and intelligence are genetic, and while you can't make assumptions about individuals, you can make assumptions about the population. We know that the last common ancestor between whites and Africans was 60,000 years ago, and that most human brain evolution occurred in the last 10,000 outside of Africa, due to the discovery of agriculture. In addition, we can see morphological and functional differences in brain scans. Africans have smaller prefrontal cortexes, and fewer cortical convolutions (indicating less processing power).
This is all in addition to behavioral we differences we observe, cross culturally. For example, Africans fail the mirror test until they are pretty old.
What you're saying is actually a form of creationism. Evolution is racist, it optimized the different races for the environments they evolved in. In Africa you don't need intelligence to survive, food is abundant and available year round. I. The north, it's not available for half the year, so you need to evolve to be very forward thinking and clever.
White people are better at living in modern societies because our ancestors already paid their dues in the past. There is a reason the Europeans found that Africans were still living in mud huts, and hadn't even discovered written language, while they were zipping around on sea faring wooden ships. We are better than them.
Ok, let's go with "genetically close group" -- there are people in Africa who are genetically more akin to European populations than they are to the rest of Africa (R1b in parts of Central Africa, look it up). That same haplogroup much lower in E. Europe (specifically, Ukraine).
Although I would most definitely agree that skin color is a very poor indication of "race", I don't think anyone wants to make the case that Cameroonians are more European than Ukrainians (maybe some might, who knows).
From there, I would once again posit that neither skin color nor genetic haplogroup affiliation has very much to do with culture -- which can have many variations within both similar skin pigmentations as well as genetic affiliations (Swedes and Swiss are not 100% alike culturally, even if they may look very similar and have very similar genetics, as an example).
And I'm not the one trying to make the "better than them" argument -- I'm just pointing out that no one should be considered better than in the eyes of the law...which IS a marxist/socialist construct ("four legs good; two legs bad; some pigs are better than others" -- no thanks; I don't want to live under that social code).
You're talking a single measure of closeness, which is not a valid argument. Haven't you wondered how gene testing companies like 23andMe are able to determine your ethnicity and race? In the last 10 years, due to advancement in gene testing, we actually can determine (almost down to the region) where you came from due to correlations in alleles and such. You can see such clustering even when examining only a few alleles, here is just one such example https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Plots-of-genetic-similarity-according-to-Eigenstrat-derived-PCA-based-axes-of-genetic_fig1_225095386.
What you're missing, and what most libertarian types need to understand, is that your personality and behavioral profile is mostly determined by the time you are born. Culture is a reflection of genetic predisposition, not an overlay on top of it. The ones asserting that culture create differences in behavior are making the same "blank slate" argument that liberals make when they assert that gender is a social construct.
It's actually not, anti-racism is actually the Marxist construct. The soviet union was the first to publicly assert that race didn't matter, and that class did https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/06/15/despite-its-complicated-history-soviet-antiracism-was-ahead-of-the-historical-curve-a70569.
Racism is actually a biological construct; being a racist just means that you recognize that evolution is real. And lastly, being equal under the law, doesn't mean equal. At some point you have to ask yourself, are the people that are good making up for those who are not? And when it comes to Africans, the answer is a resounding no. They shouldn't be harmed, but if we keep trying to accommodate them we are only going to destroy our own societies. They need to go back to Africa.
You're the one who brought it up; just responding!
"Libertarian type" -- haha! I'm sure the more "libertarian types" on this board just love the fact that you called me that (seriously, they and I have had arguments with each other before; don't think they'd call me that).
On that note: I don't deny the existence of racism, nor really with evolution (although I'm not without skepticism as to the myriad of theories regarding it). I do however consider, as a person with some fondness for Christianity, both to be things appropriately countenanced with some deal of skepticism and caution -- I'm not down with a lot of what I've seen, not at all...from spiritual as well as scientific standpoints.
The Soviet Union pushed anti-racism as a means to undermining the United States...what they actually did in their own society was a different matter altogether. In fact, one could argue that eugenics (a construct with very racist underpinnings in addition to class-ist ones) has always been part and parcel of any socialist movement. In short, they're racist af. They love segregating people off into categories!
"They need to go back to Africa": who? and more to the point -- where in Africa? (it isn't a monolithic place: genetically, racially, genetically, linguistically...culturally). And, why just "them"? I for one would dearly love to send white American leftists back to Europe (anything to get them the fuck out of my backyard) ...but that's perhaps a bit unfair to Europeans; selfish if you will...and where would be a whole other issue.
This is completely untrue, and shows a significant lack of historical understanding. The soviets believed in anti-racism because they believed in Lysenkioism, which is an outright denial of natural selection. They believed in it so deeply they even allowed their own crops to fail, and their people to starve, in order to keep up the facade that it was correct. They also didn't divide by race at all, only class. They were even the first to allow women in their military and secret police, because they thought that men and women were basically the same. And it also had nothing to do with the US at all; this all happened long before there was any real tension between the soviets and the US.
Uh, all African Americans? I suspect back to the Ivory Coast, which is where almost all slaves originated from, but frankly I don't care where.
"The soviets believed in anti-racism because they believed in Lysenkioism, which is an outright denial of natural selection."
The victims of numerous "ethnic cleansings" (which was really taking the idea of "races" of people to an extreme) are alas no longer available for comment.
You do know what the primary tenet of Lysenkoism is, correct? In a nutshell that acquired traits can become hereditary -- which is pretty damn, well, racist. My genes have definitely given me my height, certain immunities/weaknesses to certain diseases, even my skin/hair/eye color, and yes has factored into my IQ (although there could be a great debate to be had for just how valuable IQ is in the making of success or even a good citizen -- some might say individual character does play a significant role, I tend to agree with that)...but it has not conferred any ability whatsoever to build a ship...or sing opera.
Why should every African American be compelled to go to Africa? Culturally they wouldn't fit in as they weren't raised in any of those cultures; genetically they wouldn't either (most of them carry a significant European genetic footprint). And maybe they would just prefer to stay where they were originally from; there's that reason. Oh, wait, surely you don't believe (since you don't believe racism = skin color) that all people who have Sub-Saharan African features belong to a particular race (as you described it -- genetic proximity, not skin color)? Well, whatever you do, don't put them in Cameroon or Germany unless you do a genetic workup and find they've got R1b!
Eugenics was big in the US long before the USSR or Third Reich. From forcible sterilization to Planned Parenthood targeting whatever they deemed unfit (Margaret Sanger was a notorious racist).
And who was promoting it? Margaret Sanger was also a notorious socialist. But thanks for playing.
because its factually incorrect and sets up a community of such thinkers for failure.
If you teach such mindset to younger generations, they grow up thinking they don't need to try as hard to compete in anything, and they start blaming any failure, comparative to the 'lesser' people on circumstances rather than themselves.
Better instead to teach that your lineage and heritage are valuable and that value deserves effort to persevere, endure and excel.
You can think that. It doesn't mean you are that.
Why else would people cringe, go into convulsions, and beg for understanding when called racists?
Pro tip: The Root is a {{black}} publication, but it isnt owned by black people.
Gee I wonder who owns all of these publications.
you mean those '7th day adventists' again ? coof [ 109 ]
Aw f$$$ they’re owned by a company called G/O media?
They’re in the room with us now!!
Wasn't that caused by blacks not being able to pay their mortgage?
Yep. "Here, take this money for this house that we know you cannot afford because the government is forcing us to do this."
Blacks (in aggregate) have the Charmin touch.
Bankers were making money hand over fist with their liar loans and the real estate bubble. And when it came crashing down the big guys got free TARP money and acquired distressed properties.
All groups want to kill off all White people.
The weirdest part, White people are the most vicious with going about the White Genocide.
The self-hating White is about as annoying as the self-hating Jew.
blacks are deliberately taught self victimhood by our democrat controlled school system to keep them sucking at the welfare system
The truth is that blacks love victim good.it is the same thing in Uk,Brazil and Canada.Arabs and Persians also complained about blacks;it is only whites who are going against human nature.
I was thinking yesterday about how CRT and the entire hysterical conversation about "whiteness" has arisen something in me that I can only call a sort of defensive white supremacy. As in I was more than happy to treat everyone well and criticize actual racism when I saw it and generally not spend my time thinking about all this shit, but once I was called "evil" for my race and had it suggested that the world would somehow be better off if white people had never been here, that got me thinking "Fuck that. All we did was invent democracy, and penicillin, and computers, and smart phones, and automobiles, and damn near everything else."
Imagine a world where white people never existed. Where would the rest of the world be today? Would they have reached the industrial revolution yet? Do CTR morons honestly think Africa would have reached interstellar travel had Europe not colonized it six hundred years ago?
White people are the shit. I say this without wishing ill on any other race, but we are fucking great and have made the most contributions to technology that have benefited all races. I guess that makes me a "white supremacist," but it doesn't make me a bad person.
The propagation of Critical Race Theory religion in our society today is a key tool used by the globalists' & Marxists' for destabilization.
Remember, We the People greatly outnumber the enemy in so many ways, and we have yet to show our true strength (doubtful that we ever will, though).
When you're greatly outnumbered, how do you get a tactical advantage? Sneakily, by taking over key infrastructure (education, the media, tech) and using it to turn the spotlight off of you and fracturing your enemy into warring sub-groups.
Hence, the push for Critical Race Theory religion. We the People—regardless of race or creed—unified as Americans against the globalist threat is terrifying to them. But we are all under assault by their lies, instead, and focused on each other: blacks given a mirage of oppression, so that some actually believe it and lash out against whites; whites feel under assault in return, so they view blacks negatively. The rhetoric escalates, as we see in this article, and the division gets wider and wider while the globalists continue to gain more tactical advantages despite their small size.
If there is anything I've learned about CRT and the culture wars in general is that a lot of it is a paper tiger. The adherents of this religion are small in number and only large in prominence, propped up by those seized institutions, such as higher ed, the media, and tech. A lot of your fellow Americans, regardless of skin color, do not care. If anything, most are scared to speak out (or face "cancellation" or worse).
I share the feelings you have in your comment. How could you not when you're under assault like this? But remember... the fog of war is real, and reality is constantly being warped. What to do? Return to your core values and let them guide you. You and I know that it is America (and Americans) first. We judge base on the content of one's character, not some "identity markers." We cannot abandon those critical values now and play into the hands of the globalists. Our energies need to be on purging the CRT religion from our institutions as it is not only anti-American, but anti-human. People are not the issue here; a sick ideology is, and it is trying to turn Americans against each other.
Welcome to the club, fren.
I agree with Mr. Woods. There has been a war ongoing against whites for some time now. The Marxists want to turn the US into South Africa. There is a reason none of the DNCMSM ever reports on what is going on there as it is a genocide of whites especially white farms. Whites are being discriminated against. Many blacks and coloreds (as they are called there) lose their jobs when white farmers are murdered. If we don't stand up for our race, we will become SA sooner rather than later esp with the Demtard push to get rid of our 2A. This is part of the reason why we have open borders allowing hordes of economic illegal aliens to invade our country. We have enough of our own people struggling especially after a year of this PLANdemic which was, among other things, deployed to destroy small businesses across the US.
They want whites extinct.
every blade of grass motherfukers!
If white people do not start fighting back immediately, we are going to find ourselves in one of the worst imaginable situations. These people think that In order to have a utopia, white people need to die. It's pushed by our government, and our government hates us. If white people do not figure out a way to combat this immediately, we are dead. I say 30,000 to 50,000 white males need to invade a country. Afterwards, the rest of our white brothers and sisters can meet us there.
What's keeping us from invading other countries like we used to? Nothing. Smart, healthy white men with formidable fighting skills, weapons and ammunition could easily take over a small country. Think about it. I honestly don't think there's any saving America. The only way that our white race, culture and way of life can live on is if we start our own country by means of colonization. They call us colonizers for a reason. I suggest every single one of you and get in touch with the thought that the only way out of this, and the only way to survive is through colonization.
Which country? Europe is fucked.Antarctica is too cold and it won’t contain everyone.the only hope is whites in Latin America and whites in North America joining hands and creating a bigger nation than USA.
Giving up America would make things worse.Our forefathers built this nation and they would be ashamed at all conservatives especially those who believe in civic nationalism.
I was thinking Panama. We don't have to just conform to one country. There are Pacific Island chains, Greenland, Europe is fucked and nobody wants to fight for it. America will die when whites leave and we can take it back by force.
he's posting again? sweet!
Yes they are.
Hope this author gets a lot of blowback for this hate-filled screed.
More important for the owners of The Root to get blowback, but they won't.
Find advertisers on their page, contact them with selectively edited snippets from the Root saying "you support writers that openly call for genocide?"
Woke cancel culture is a plague weaponized against liberty, but it is effective. Use it against them.
Best NYT can do is a promotion
They really, really want that race war to kick off.
And they say we are inciting violence by just saying we want a proper audit of the election results and will not accept the false results they are claiming when they are literally saying to go kill people.
https://www.vulture.com/2011/05/jane_fondas_sons_wedding_sound.html
Hayden's goal is probably shared by much of the Coastal Elite
Silly man, racial genocide requires power + racial mass murder, so whites can't be racial genocided /s
All this is a distraction from the true crime of industrial scale voter fraud. This is what a psyop looks like.
change white to black and repost it to social media.
WELL THEY BETTER COME ARMED!
Is this a recent missive from Woods? It is nice to hear from him again.
stay locked and loaded frens
Don't any of you dare look into who owns the NYT and, wonder why that one ethnic group would want to erase whiteness
They keep up this rhetoric and they'll see what right wing extremism really is. Right wing death squads in every shithole of a neighborhood. Keep it up lol. They're only fanning the flames of the fire that will consume them.
2 lies being told there, as viruses that wipe out their hosts quickly/entirely, also wipe themselves out, and thus is not beneficial for the propagation of the virus
What the NYT is saying is that, if theres no one for the white supremacists to kill, then the white supremacists die. So both white supremacists and their victims must die. "Liquidating our assests. Everything must go"
(((NYT))).
did the NYSlimes omit the part that this had nothing to do with race but a guys perverted "sexual addiction"?
Anyone who calls themselves "The Root" is giving themselves a bloviated sense of importance.
No wonder they are willing to say they want all white people dead.
Is that rhetorical?
Ofc it is. What matters is will people swallow it or not
The fact that he even asks worries me. It is well past time for serious people to accept the obvious.
Always supported genocides, people should learn from history.
If you have to ask
Is the #NYTimes supporting racial genocide? The answer is yes. Yes they are. There is nothing the New York Times like more than death and murder and genocide. This is what they feed on. Don't believe me? Go back and read through any single edition ever published...
If not actively endorsed it it's tacitly encouraged it. A star journalist there covered for Stalin as the latter starved civilians. The Times barely mentioned Nazi atrocities.
We should dox the writer and show up at his home. Give him an opportunity to try and kill some whiteness.
Not really. The Root has always been racist.