Exactly... The jizzing here for Dan is weird... I've listened to him for years but he basically avoided the voter fraud, bangs on about midterms like elections will ever matter again, pretends Parlor weren't harvesting user data and then in the next breath says any free product means you are the product etc etc etc.. There are so many examples of him avoiding big topics just to ensure he isn't banned everywhere.
He has a lot of good material as well so don't get me wrong but he toes the line like everyone else.
Wasn't he told, along with Mark Levine, that if they pushed the voter fraud issue, they'd be taken off the air? So, if he's staying with that network, it doesn't really matter what time slot he gets. That was part of Rush's genius - he didn't answer to anyone. He talked about whatever he wanted to and discussed whatever the callers wanted to discuss.
I agree with the comments below, about Mark Steyn - he'd be the best to cover the 12-3 slot, on Rush Radio. Whoever ends up permanently filling in for Rush, or even if they keep rotating different people to speak into the golden EIB microphone, will be who I listen to. They'll have the freedom to discuss whatever they want and won't have to answer to some PC corporate talking head.
There is a certain irony in having a British person broadcasting every day about freedom, liberty and American greatness!!
Bongino dropped the ball (mostly) on voter fraud. To play it safe for this radio money? Or because he was too weakened by lymphoma?
Let’s hope it was the cancer.
Exactly... The jizzing here for Dan is weird... I've listened to him for years but he basically avoided the voter fraud, bangs on about midterms like elections will ever matter again, pretends Parlor weren't harvesting user data and then in the next breath says any free product means you are the product etc etc etc.. There are so many examples of him avoiding big topics just to ensure he isn't banned everywhere. He has a lot of good material as well so don't get me wrong but he toes the line like everyone else.
Wasn't he told, along with Mark Levine, that if they pushed the voter fraud issue, they'd be taken off the air? So, if he's staying with that network, it doesn't really matter what time slot he gets. That was part of Rush's genius - he didn't answer to anyone. He talked about whatever he wanted to and discussed whatever the callers wanted to discuss.
I agree with the comments below, about Mark Steyn - he'd be the best to cover the 12-3 slot, on Rush Radio. Whoever ends up permanently filling in for Rush, or even if they keep rotating different people to speak into the golden EIB microphone, will be who I listen to. They'll have the freedom to discuss whatever they want and won't have to answer to some PC corporate talking head.
There is a certain irony in having a British person broadcasting every day about freedom, liberty and American greatness!!