I would have preferred Mark Stein. I think he's got a better presentation and doesn't compromise his principles (as far as I've seen). Edit: HA, didn't scroll down to see the Stein comments until after posting mine.
Stein has a greater sense of humor and wit — Bongino is great for distilling and delivering understandable debate facts and digging into issues, but not as purely entertaining.
Rush was a master of mixing facts and reason deep into the batter of conversational charisma and engaging charm. And Trump proved that entertainment value goes a lot further than factual correctness when it comes to achieving results.
Stein's humor and wit really drives home many of his points while keeping your interest, much like Rush. I find Bongino frequently boring. I wish him success, but I just don't think he's got "it". So I think we're on the same page.
Bongino dropped the ball (mostly) on voter fraud. To play it safe for this radio money? Or because he was too weakened by lymphoma?
Let’s hope it was the cancer.
I would have preferred Mark Stein. I think he's got a better presentation and doesn't compromise his principles (as far as I've seen). Edit: HA, didn't scroll down to see the Stein comments until after posting mine.
Stein has a greater sense of humor and wit — Bongino is great for distilling and delivering understandable debate facts and digging into issues, but not as purely entertaining.
Rush was a master of mixing facts and reason deep into the batter of conversational charisma and engaging charm. And Trump proved that entertainment value goes a lot further than factual correctness when it comes to achieving results.
Stein's humor and wit really drives home many of his points while keeping your interest, much like Rush. I find Bongino frequently boring. I wish him success, but I just don't think he's got "it". So I think we're on the same page.