What part of the bill says "black"? If you see someone working to remove disruptive elements from school to make a better environment for learning and think to yourself, "How dare you target black kids" you might be a racist.
You are absolutely correct, but on the flip side, and so we don't become the echo chamber that the left is, I'm pretty sure they are saying that they believe it will be used to unfairly target black kids
Which, I suppose, depending on how the law was written, it could probably be used to target any kid of any color..... but we already know that, even if it targets a majority of white kids, they're still going to cry anytime it targets the black kid.. no matter the context....
"Unfairly" implies they'll just remove a kid who coughed one time during class because he's the wrong color. Even a loaded policy like this is gonna require multiple documented infractions before it's ever enforced.
I dont see abuse happening unjustly to someone who isn't a legit hinderance to decorum in a classroom in every subject. Like how's one racist teacher gonna file a baseless complaint against a student who is otherwise, for lack of a better term, an angel in every other subjects classroom?
So if some kids that make school an intolerable environment for learning happen to be black we should just accept that school is supposed to be a chaotic zoo where nobody learns?
This is not a problem for the white elites that run and support blm because they send their kids to private schools.
What part of the bill says "black"? If you see someone working to remove disruptive elements from school to make a better environment for learning and think to yourself, "How dare you target black kids" you might be a racist.
You are absolutely correct, but on the flip side, and so we don't become the echo chamber that the left is, I'm pretty sure they are saying that they believe it will be used to unfairly target black kids
Which, I suppose, depending on how the law was written, it could probably be used to target any kid of any color..... but we already know that, even if it targets a majority of white kids, they're still going to cry anytime it targets the black kid.. no matter the context....
"Unfairly" implies they'll just remove a kid who coughed one time during class because he's the wrong color. Even a loaded policy like this is gonna require multiple documented infractions before it's ever enforced.
I dont see abuse happening unjustly to someone who isn't a legit hinderance to decorum in a classroom in every subject. Like how's one racist teacher gonna file a baseless complaint against a student who is otherwise, for lack of a better term, an angel in every other subjects classroom?
The reality is it will dis-proportionally effect boys no matter the race.
I know that obviously... I more or less said I was only playing the devil's advocate and did actually say it in my first comment above....
So if some kids that make school an intolerable environment for learning happen to be black we should just accept that school is supposed to be a chaotic zoo where nobody learns?
This is not a problem for the white elites that run and support blm because they send their kids to private schools.
Yes thats exactly what is expected. Obama took it further and penalized schools for disciplining students.
Sadly I think it's more likely to be used on the conservative kids who get too uppity during a lecture about global warming.