They used to call RNA "junk DNA" and for a long time believed it was useless. But then they realized that RNA and DNA are intricately connected and one doesn't work without the other.
Modifying your RNA is virtually the same as modifying your DNA in the first place, at least as far as 99.99% of the population understands the concept of DNA and "programing" organisms.
This is where the Fact Checkers get of screaming "It's not modifying DNA you conspiracy theorist, just the RNA which is the actual program they are talking about reprogramming!!"
If you think of DNA as the core code of a computer, like the drivers running the hardware, then the RNA is like the actual Operating system. RNA is what does all the work while the DNA is supposed to remain an unchanged blueprint. They are trying to give your operating system a Windows Update and an autoimmune disorder that makes people dependent on annual injections. Surely doctors know more about correcting RNA than programmers know about fixing much simpler programs they themselves wrote, right? Surely it must be true.
Go beyond the DNA and focus on what they are proposing to do to the immune system. Your immune system is adaptive and they are trying to make it specific. Even if they succeed, if they are 100% on the level with what they are trying to achieve, they are trying to change an adaptive system into a targeted specific system. That will make everyone incredibly vulnerable to virtually any disease their immune system was not preprogramed to fight. Or, maybe vaccine dependent for the rest of their lives.
It wasn't the "vaccine" or any of it's components that was listed to cause either of those, it was the successful immunization itself. Sounds an awful lot like some of the deaths being reported following the vax.
Thank you! I always felt I was in a crazy parallel world where RNA was taught that way in my high school biology classes back in the day. I don't see others talking about it.
Back then I felt this view was wrong, and it's one of the reasons I prefer to do my only research into anything scientific rather than accepting anything I read as gospel.
I don't believe there is a "vestigial organ" left that they haven't found a use for, either. The arrogance of man knows no bounds.
"If I can't figure it out, it must be useless."
They also recently discovered that there are lymphatic nodes in the brain. Pretty much a hundred years of medical science about the brain and the immune system should be thrown completely out the window.
Dont worry. The panic pushers will downvote you without referencing the function of mRNA. Essentially mRNA acts as a go between of DNA and ribosomes. It doesnt alter DNA. What the mRNA "vaccines" do is put mRNA into your cells that interact with the ribosomes to produce the infamous spike protein. Once the spike protein is produces, your body learns how to recognize the spike protein and produce antibodies that fight off the coronavirus.
Not really, am mobilefag so I don't have archives. Just use your favorite search engine. One of the things I remember from last time I looked into it was a vaccine manufacturer describing the difference and the key word IMO was intent.
It's worth noting that they're engineering the mRNA (why you'll see the term synthetic thrown around)
I'm not saying this stuff does alter DNA, I'm just saying it has the capability, regardless of their intention.
I think it's honestly just more likely to kill you or leave you with a horrible autoimmune disorder. You can also expect that your children will have it from birth.
Here's an article from 1998 explaining how government health agencies are essentially run by eugenicists quacks and social engineers (although it doesn't spell it out in those specific terms).
“In every cell there’s this thing called messenger RNA or mRNA for short, that transmits the critical information from the DNA in our genes to the protein, which is really the stuff we’re all made out of. This is the critical information that determines what the cell will do. So we think about it as an operating system. …. So if you could actually change that, … if you could introduce a line of code, or change a line of code, it turns out, that has profound implications for everything, from the flu to cancer.”
The line "so if you could actually change that" is clearly referring to the subject of the paragraph from the first sentence, mRNA.
Subject to interpretation. Could go either way. Rule of thumb would suggest that the most recent item mentioned before 'change that' is the thing to be changed, IE DNA.
They used to call RNA "junk DNA" and for a long time believed it was useless. But then they realized that RNA and DNA are intricately connected and one doesn't work without the other.
Modifying your RNA is virtually the same as modifying your DNA in the first place, at least as far as 99.99% of the population understands the concept of DNA and "programing" organisms.
This is where the Fact Checkers get of screaming "It's not modifying DNA you conspiracy theorist, just the RNA which is the actual program they are talking about reprogramming!!"
If you think of DNA as the core code of a computer, like the drivers running the hardware, then the RNA is like the actual Operating system. RNA is what does all the work while the DNA is supposed to remain an unchanged blueprint. They are trying to give your operating system a Windows Update and an autoimmune disorder that makes people dependent on annual injections. Surely doctors know more about correcting RNA than programmers know about fixing much simpler programs they themselves wrote, right? Surely it must be true.
Go beyond the DNA and focus on what they are proposing to do to the immune system. Your immune system is adaptive and they are trying to make it specific. Even if they succeed, if they are 100% on the level with what they are trying to achieve, they are trying to change an adaptive system into a targeted specific system. That will make everyone incredibly vulnerable to virtually any disease their immune system was not preprogramed to fight. Or, maybe vaccine dependent for the rest of their lives.
Then of course all successful attempts to immunize to SARS resulted in developing an immunocompromised response to the *same virus: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035421 or liver damage: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2004/12/sars-vaccine-linked-liver-damage-ferret-study
It wasn't the "vaccine" or any of it's components that was listed to cause either of those, it was the successful immunization itself. Sounds an awful lot like some of the deaths being reported following the vax.
Thank you! I always felt I was in a crazy parallel world where RNA was taught that way in my high school biology classes back in the day. I don't see others talking about it.
Back then I felt this view was wrong, and it's one of the reasons I prefer to do my only research into anything scientific rather than accepting anything I read as gospel.
I don't believe there is a "vestigial organ" left that they haven't found a use for, either. The arrogance of man knows no bounds.
"If I can't figure it out, it must be useless."
They also recently discovered that there are lymphatic nodes in the brain. Pretty much a hundred years of medical science about the brain and the immune system should be thrown completely out the window.
If I'm remembering right, we were taught that RNA is basically cloned from DNA to do the work. There was a part of the cell that did this copying.
RNA is unstable as well and mutations happen. This is one way cancer can happen naturally
That is so scary. I was just watching a video on Rumble that had Dr. Lee Emmitt (i think that was her name?) and she was talking about exactly that.
Step 1: Introduce something into the body to rewrite the bodys response to it
Step 2: Release a specific pathogen the hosts are not prepared for because of Step 1.
Step 3: Everyone who takes the shot dies.
I wasn't too sure I believed any of it, but its starting to make a whole lot of sense.
Nevermind.. Here, I found the video - https://rumble.com/vdww5v-dr-lee-merit-the-vaxx-is-preparing-the-world-for-a-mass-death-event.html
No, he doesn't. The author of the crap Washington Standard article conflated the word "code" with "DNA". mRNA is not DNA.
Dont worry. The panic pushers will downvote you without referencing the function of mRNA. Essentially mRNA acts as a go between of DNA and ribosomes. It doesnt alter DNA. What the mRNA "vaccines" do is put mRNA into your cells that interact with the ribosomes to produce the infamous spike protein. Once the spike protein is produces, your body learns how to recognize the spike protein and produce antibodies that fight off the coronavirus.
Thank you for putting quotations on vaccine...
However, you're repeating the manufacturers stated intent... Look into mRNA gene therapy, which uses mRNA with the stated intent of altering DNA
Any specific educational material you could point me too?
Not really, am mobilefag so I don't have archives. Just use your favorite search engine. One of the things I remember from last time I looked into it was a vaccine manufacturer describing the difference and the key word IMO was intent.
It's worth noting that they're engineering the mRNA (why you'll see the term synthetic thrown around)
I'm not saying this stuff does alter DNA, I'm just saying it has the capability, regardless of their intention.
Heres an interesting article. It questions the mainstream concept (the one i invoked) about mRNA.
https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/03/16/mit-harvard-study-suggests-mrna-vaccine-might-permanently-alter-dna-after-all
Im definitely questioning my own dogma.
Man.... I honestly don't like the world now. What's the purpose of having this in our DNA. is it a precursor to controlling us?
I think it's honestly just more likely to kill you or leave you with a horrible autoimmune disorder. You can also expect that your children will have it from birth.
Thats a bit of a leap....
https://rumble.com/vdww5v-dr-lee-merit-the-vaxx-is-preparing-the-world-for-a-mass-death-event.html
facebook.com
Here's an article from 1998 explaining how government health agencies are essentially run by eugenicists quacks and social engineers (although it doesn't spell it out in those specific terms).
https://www.city-journal.org/html/public-health-quackery-11914.html
it's almost as if something worse is coming
SPARS 2025 https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2017/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf
https://rumble.com/vdww5v-dr-lee-merit-the-vaxx-is-preparing-the-world-for-a-mass-death-event.html
That article. Wow! And all for a fucking coof? I think not. Who knows what's coming down the pike?
Thanks, pede.
You're welcome.
This is the quote 'bombshell'
The line "so if you could actually change that" is clearly referring to the subject of the paragraph from the first sentence, mRNA.
Subject to interpretation. Could go either way. Rule of thumb would suggest that the most recent item mentioned before 'change that' is the thing to be changed, IE DNA.
Saved
user name checks out