2888
Comments (91)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
78
deleted 78 points ago +79 / -1
28
QLARP 28 points ago +29 / -1

Obviously they don't care about climate change.

Some dem donor must own oil trucks and oil trains.

Or maybe did the Keystone people use eminent domain to take some rich ranchers land then he gave money to Xiden to get revenge?

I'm not buying this climate change excuse

29
regollyek 29 points ago +29 / -0

Warren Buffett stands to gain the most from stopping Keystone Pipeline.

There's fact-checks saying that's false now, but there's articles from 5+ years ago stating it.

9
War_Hamster 9 points ago +9 / -0

I wasn't aware that they were trying to deny this.

It has always been mainly about Buffett, but it's also designed to drive up oil prices so that "renewables" can compete cost-wise.

7
MasterChef 7 points ago +7 / -0

He owns the rail line that ships oil from canada. Pretty much getting the same product in a more inefficient/costly way.

4
DonJr24 4 points ago +4 / -0

And dangerous, don't forget dangerous.

3
KillaKrayon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah I'll have to go back and get the intel on that but someone on TG had the entire breakdown of how Buffett owned the hauling rights under two separate shell companies. It was fully linked and documented but it's valid.

13
BlaineBug 13 points ago +13 / -0

There was the meme I saw a while back about Warren Buffett owning the railroads that transport the oil.

6
KillaKrayon 6 points ago +6 / -0

It was something to do with the leases on the oil hauling freight cars. Either way he made several billion off the freight cars. I think he updated the fleet and the pipeline would cause the investment to lose money if completed.

3
TakenusernameA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why didnt he just invest in the pipeline instead?

7
HLSparta 7 points ago +7 / -0

Considering the fact that now they have to use either trucks to transport it a lot further or use tanker ships and move it across the entire ocean, this was not about climate change. Or if it was, they completely failed.

3
QLARP 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is there a eminent domain issue?

You can't do a road or pipeline across 5 states without making atleast some farmers or ranchers pissed off for the government stealing their land...

1
HLSparta 1 point ago +1 / -0

As much as I hate eminent domain, this is one time I agree with it, assuming the landowners receive a fair offer. Of course it is a lot easier for me to say that when it's not my land though. Although it is possible to get out of eminent domain through land patents, which I wish more people knew about. I'm not sure how easy or difficult it is, and I'm also not sure if it's possible if offers have already been made on your land.

2
LadyPedette 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes! You got it. This is what I've been pointing out. This is all under the guise of " climate change " yet, deploying trucks, planes and tanks goes completely against their narrative. It's so insidious, I don't know how more people don't see this

2
nemonster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trains; warren buffet

1
Junionthepipeline 1 point ago +1 / -0

You just pay to put in the right of way .pipelines are not really that big.

3
Women4Trump2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ken Paxton is the man. A True Patriot.

2
OhhhhNooooThatSucks 2 points ago +2 / -0

KXL still has a long way to go to get through nebraska. The president is just one of the many issues this project will continue to face.