The Convention of States is a so-far unused piece of the Constitution which says the states can override congress and create amendments if things get out of whack. Any changes require 2/3 of all state legislatures to ratify.
The reason it is unused is that up until recently, whenever Congress sniffed out that a Convention of States was coming, they swooped in, did this part themselves, and took the credit.
The issue on the table here? Term limits for Congress. Which is why they'd never swoop in to take the credit this time around.
People forget that a lot of us were pretty damned blackpilled during the Obama years. Trump was a pleasant surprise. This project was just getting started back then, and has still been working all this time. It made a lot of headway in 2019.
Convention of States has always been the real answer. Trump bought us time, however.
Roughly half would be an immediate lock. Then they just need enough Soros/globalist money, death threats, and other shenanigans to get 13 more. Understand that the enemy would be willing to pour literally trillions of dollars into subverting a Constitutional Convention, because it would be a death blow against us.
Meanwhile, find 38 states that would be willing to do literally ANYTHING in our favor. You have to understand that they control the blue states outright, and they've deeply subverted the red states...or have you forgotten Georgia?
It's possible that they'd pass term limits, but only because they're a trap:
First, term limits mean that corrupt politicians in their last term won't even pay lip service to their constituents in the hope of keeping their prestigious elected office for another term. Instead, the moment their last term started, they'd immediately start going to work for the highest corporate/NGO bidder promising them a cushy follow-up career.
Term limits also make elected legislators too inexperienced to investigate and outmaneuver outmaneuver the vastly more experienced unelected bureaucracy who steer them and staff their offices. (Look at how the bureaucrats underneath President Trump undermined him for an example.) Pelosi wouldn't be in Congress, because she wouldn't have to be anymore. The balance of power would shift more toward unelected career Democrats, and they'd complicate things to the point where the legitimate elected government ran around chasing their tails for their entire tenure before figuring out how they were being played.
Finally, corrupt politicians are a dime a dozen and easily replaceable...but good ones are extremely rare, and we need to keep them as long as possible, because their replacement will almost always be worse.
https://conventionofstates.com/
The Convention of States is a so-far unused piece of the Constitution which says the states can override congress and create amendments if things get out of whack. Any changes require 2/3 of all state legislatures to ratify.
The reason it is unused is that up until recently, whenever Congress sniffed out that a Convention of States was coming, they swooped in, did this part themselves, and took the credit.
The issue on the table here? Term limits for Congress. Which is why they'd never swoop in to take the credit this time around.
People forget that a lot of us were pretty damned blackpilled during the Obama years. Trump was a pleasant surprise. This project was just getting started back then, and has still been working all this time. It made a lot of headway in 2019.
Convention of States has always been the real answer. Trump bought us time, however.
Tell ya what. Go look at a Map and fine 38 states that would vote to abolish the second amendment.
Roughly half would be an immediate lock. Then they just need enough Soros/globalist money, death threats, and other shenanigans to get 13 more. Understand that the enemy would be willing to pour literally trillions of dollars into subverting a Constitutional Convention, because it would be a death blow against us.
Meanwhile, find 38 states that would be willing to do literally ANYTHING in our favor. You have to understand that they control the blue states outright, and they've deeply subverted the red states...or have you forgotten Georgia?
It's possible that they'd pass term limits, but only because they're a trap: First, term limits mean that corrupt politicians in their last term won't even pay lip service to their constituents in the hope of keeping their prestigious elected office for another term. Instead, the moment their last term started, they'd immediately start going to work for the highest corporate/NGO bidder promising them a cushy follow-up career.
Term limits also make elected legislators too inexperienced to investigate and outmaneuver outmaneuver the vastly more experienced unelected bureaucracy who steer them and staff their offices. (Look at how the bureaucrats underneath President Trump undermined him for an example.) Pelosi wouldn't be in Congress, because she wouldn't have to be anymore. The balance of power would shift more toward unelected career Democrats, and they'd complicate things to the point where the legitimate elected government ran around chasing their tails for their entire tenure before figuring out how they were being played.
Finally, corrupt politicians are a dime a dozen and easily replaceable...but good ones are extremely rare, and we need to keep them as long as possible, because their replacement will almost always be worse.