They can swap faces onto other bodies. So, there is a concern about revenge porn, where you substitute your ex-girlfriend's face onto porn. And then allege that she really made porn.
They say it's still unclear what law says about this.
But a person obviously owns their own face image, as the first, inalienable copyright. It's theirs and nobody can use it without permission.
Nothing unclear about that.
For instance, google is careful not to show recognizable people in its street views. They spend much valuable time and energy blurring faces. Why? They don't want lawsuits.
Theft of identity is a well known concept, defined as illegal.
They can swap faces onto other bodies. So, there is a concern about revenge porn, where you substitute your ex-girlfriend's face onto porn. And then allege that she really made porn.
They say it's still unclear what law says about this.
But a person obviously owns their own face image, as the first, inalienable copyright. It's theirs and nobody can use it without permission. Nothing unclear about that.
For instance, google is careful not to show recognizable people in its street views. They spend much valuable time and energy blurring faces. Why? They don't want lawsuits.
Theft of identity is a well known concept, defined as illegal.