As a biological conservative woman there are way to many women in politics. Women should never be allowed to be president or vp, be allowed in the military, police force or fire department.
Women tend to be irrational, illogical and make decisions based on feefees. Men don’t take women in politics, military etc seriously bc men are biologically superior and don’t fear women. Never have and never will.
Imagine a woman telling Putin, the Middle East, North Korea etc what weapons they can and can’t have?
I don’t agree with the right to vote taken away especially since I pay taxes and am entitled to a say bc I want us to go back to a conservative constitutional republic where life evolves around the family. The voting age needs to be increased to 25 or 30.
I can see a woman putting fear into Putin and North Korea it only because she would be backed up by an entire military full of men..
the reality is that there are women that can do what men can do. They're a female basketball players that could whoop the asses of the average dude..
And there are women who were extremely capable. Pretending that all women are inferior just because they're women is stupid. But it's also true that a large majority are extremely manipulatable.. They vote against their own interests. the Republican Party would be better for women overall in the long run then the Democrat one.. sure in the certain term the Democrats help women feel better by pushing female supremacist ideology but in the long run it hurts women just look at the transgender sports debate to see how the Democrat Party In the end will always screw over those it's pretending to helpp
And so while there's plenty of good women. They do also a majority of the time vote against their own best interests.. and it would actually result in a better situation for them overall if they simply weren't allowed to vote at all. They would be happier and their lives would be better because politics would end up helping them more..
capable women are rare look at margaret thatcher they invaded Falklands because they thought she was a weak woman and had to be proven wrong if a man was prime faggot they would not have started that war IMO
It's because anyone running on a platform of rolling back women's suffrage would lose instantly. Women will create a femanized US in which there is no going back. We are truly fucked in the long term.
Voting was never a right. You have the right to representation, but voting is a responsibility. Those who require leaders are not qualified to chose them.
And ownership made sense at the beginning of the Constitution because there were only 13 states and entire 70% of the United States wasn't even explored yet.. owning land was extremely easy because it was incredibly abundant.. it was in the 1950s that the government officially declared that the frontier was over.. I'm a majority of the United States land had already been claimed and settled on.. and you could no longer just pack up and travel West to start your own farm on some unclaimed land..
So of course it made sense in a time in the United States When anybody could own land. Just travel out and claim some..
But not everybody can do that.. sure there's people that were born in the '50s that saved up during the good economic Times and bought a house for $30,000 that ended up turning into $300,000 but not everybody can buy a $300,000 house. Not everybody can afford to put down hundreds of thousands of dollars buying land..
Many people rent. Many people sublease. Half of the United States population lives in cities where they rent apartments..
are you saying we should take voting rights away from literally 50% of the American people and only give it to farmers?.
There's better ways to restrict voting rights to get good outcomes then requiring possession of a very finite resourcee
Your argument might hold water but you're ignoring the fact that the feds own a massive amount of land. It's disingenuous to say there's not enough. There's more than plenty.
People don't care about things they don't have a stake in. If the don't pay the property tax they don't feel the weight.
Renters do not care about the long term, they care about making rent.
we could just require some kind of basic civics test to get a license to vote. If you need a license to drive and a license to own a gun and a license to do a bunch of other things that you have the right to from the Constitution then there should be no reason we can't implement a license to vote.. it doesn't have to be discriminatory.. it can be a basic license. You have to take a test and prove that you at least know who all the candidates are and what they all stand for and what their policies are. That reads out the stupid people..
and then you get a license to vote for that year.. and then you can vote.
This looks like the actual total vote count before the big steal.
As a biological conservative woman there are way to many women in politics. Women should never be allowed to be president or vp, be allowed in the military, police force or fire department.
Women tend to be irrational, illogical and make decisions based on feefees. Men don’t take women in politics, military etc seriously bc men are biologically superior and don’t fear women. Never have and never will.
Imagine a woman telling Putin, the Middle East, North Korea etc what weapons they can and can’t have?
I don’t agree with the right to vote taken away especially since I pay taxes and am entitled to a say bc I want us to go back to a conservative constitutional republic where life evolves around the family. The voting age needs to be increased to 25 or 30.
I'd be OK with every net contributor to taxes being able to vote.
If you take out more than you put in, you can't vote. Because those people will always vote to take more and more and more out of the system.
I can see a woman putting fear into Putin and North Korea it only because she would be backed up by an entire military full of men..
the reality is that there are women that can do what men can do. They're a female basketball players that could whoop the asses of the average dude..
And there are women who were extremely capable. Pretending that all women are inferior just because they're women is stupid. But it's also true that a large majority are extremely manipulatable.. They vote against their own interests. the Republican Party would be better for women overall in the long run then the Democrat one.. sure in the certain term the Democrats help women feel better by pushing female supremacist ideology but in the long run it hurts women just look at the transgender sports debate to see how the Democrat Party In the end will always screw over those it's pretending to helpp
And so while there's plenty of good women. They do also a majority of the time vote against their own best interests.. and it would actually result in a better situation for them overall if they simply weren't allowed to vote at all. They would be happier and their lives would be better because politics would end up helping them more..
capable women are rare look at margaret thatcher they invaded Falklands because they thought she was a weak woman and had to be proven wrong if a man was prime faggot they would not have started that war IMO
You're right but no "conservative" will touch this with a 10 foot pole because 90% of them are deeply closeted feminists.
It's because anyone running on a platform of rolling back women's suffrage would lose instantly. Women will create a femanized US in which there is no going back. We are truly fucked in the long term.
The 19th Amendment was a mistake.
Change my mind.
Voting was never a right. You have the right to representation, but voting is a responsibility. Those who require leaders are not qualified to chose them.
Abortion aka the new slavery.
You just have to fix Ruby Freeman's vote.
August 26, 1920. Darkest day in the nation's history.
Stupid (mostly) white women voting against western men and culture and against their own interests and the interests of their children.
We just need more based women to educate their sisters.
you want an even hotter take?
don't let people who are STUPID (iq under average) vote and you'll have exactly the same map
what does that say about women?
Want a hotter take?
Go back to the constitution and require land ownership.
(Also go back to requiring citizenship to owning land).
This is my constitutional wet dream. I'd be giving up my vote for this (at least for the moment), and I'd be GLAD TO.
And ownership made sense at the beginning of the Constitution because there were only 13 states and entire 70% of the United States wasn't even explored yet.. owning land was extremely easy because it was incredibly abundant.. it was in the 1950s that the government officially declared that the frontier was over.. I'm a majority of the United States land had already been claimed and settled on.. and you could no longer just pack up and travel West to start your own farm on some unclaimed land..
So of course it made sense in a time in the United States When anybody could own land. Just travel out and claim some..
But not everybody can do that.. sure there's people that were born in the '50s that saved up during the good economic Times and bought a house for $30,000 that ended up turning into $300,000 but not everybody can buy a $300,000 house. Not everybody can afford to put down hundreds of thousands of dollars buying land..
Many people rent. Many people sublease. Half of the United States population lives in cities where they rent apartments..
are you saying we should take voting rights away from literally 50% of the American people and only give it to farmers?.
There's better ways to restrict voting rights to get good outcomes then requiring possession of a very finite resourcee
Your argument might hold water but you're ignoring the fact that the feds own a massive amount of land. It's disingenuous to say there's not enough. There's more than plenty.
People don't care about things they don't have a stake in. If the don't pay the property tax they don't feel the weight.
Renters do not care about the long term, they care about making rent.
we could just require some kind of basic civics test to get a license to vote. If you need a license to drive and a license to own a gun and a license to do a bunch of other things that you have the right to from the Constitution then there should be no reason we can't implement a license to vote.. it doesn't have to be discriminatory.. it can be a basic license. You have to take a test and prove that you at least know who all the candidates are and what they all stand for and what their policies are. That reads out the stupid people..
and then you get a license to vote for that year.. and then you can vote.
Socialism is:
a) free money and equality for everyone
b) death to the patriarchy and white supremacy
c) green energy, everyone is vegan, no more airplanes
d) cancer