15
Comments (6)
sorted by:
2
cryptopede 2 points ago +2 / -0

haha okay let's give this a go, only for the sake of argument.. "they" kill the non-vaccinated OR the vaccine kills the vaccinated. Therefore, we will not have two new races. :D

2
Populist_Leader 2 points ago +2 / -0

If they wanted to depopulate the planet, it’d make sense to make the vaccine the mechanism to do it.

But on the other hand, why would you intentionally kill the willfully enslaved sheeple? They are the ones who give power to the globalist ideas

2
cryptopede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Incompetence mainly. But I actually agree with OP. This is a have and have not situation, and I can easily see it turning into a 'GMO race' and 'non-GM race'. I just thought my comment was a funny half-joke.

1
CarbonMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Naw, i think the definition of a race doesn't allow for that. Not yet at least!

1
Proud_American 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which is silly because we still want actual vaccinations for certain viruses...Just not gene therapy for a cold virus with survival rate close to 100%.

This will be a yearly shot, too. Guaranteed.

1
dukeofdoorcounty 1 point ago +1 / -0

One race will have nano-globules of anti-freeze lodged in their brains, and the other won't.