Filibuster isn't written into the Constitution, it's in Rule XXII of the Senate. So Senate could abolish or set a new precedent by simple majority vote any time and the courts can't do anything about it. It's outside their jurisdiction.
Fuck off dude. That's how the law works. Senate rules are under the sole jurisdiction of the Senate. SCOTUS cannot weigh in - it's a nonjusticiable question under the law.
The original post didn’t say ACB can’t be relied on to reverse the senate’s rules, the original post said ACB can’t be relied on to stop the democratic senate from deconstructing the constitution and thereby destroying checks and balances. tedandlisa123 is right, you are wrong.
Senate makes its own rules.
Filibuster isn't written into the Constitution, it's in Rule XXII of the Senate. So Senate could abolish or set a new precedent by simple majority vote any time and the courts can't do anything about it. It's outside their jurisdiction.
Stop blaming her for nothing.
Quit simping over a traitor nerd
Fuck off dude. That's how the law works. Senate rules are under the sole jurisdiction of the Senate. SCOTUS cannot weigh in - it's a nonjusticiable question under the law.
The original post didn’t say ACB can’t be relied on to reverse the senate’s rules, the original post said ACB can’t be relied on to stop the democratic senate from deconstructing the constitution and thereby destroying checks and balances. tedandlisa123 is right, you are wrong.
It specifically states "If the Dems scrap the filibuster..."
Supreme Court can't stop them from doing that. That's what I was mentioning.