If Trump were running the show each of these instances would be wall to wall coverage for months. Instead, the left seems to think our reputation on the global stage no longer maters. 🤡🌎
Comments (205)
sorted by:
If Trump were running the show each of these instances would be wall to wall coverage for months. Instead, the left seems to think our reputation on the global stage no longer maters. 🤡🌎
That and we retain out ability to own firearms. That's literally all it takes to be a world super power. We can make as much debt as we want. But if everyone is armed we can't easily been invaded
so we need the dollar to crash in an instant, not drop slowly, and still hold the guns?
wouldn't it be easier to surround state capitols en-masse and lock them down with numbers?
edit: "as long as the central banks and petro dollar exist" so i'm just running out the ground ball, not a suggestion - It's a simple question.
Do you guys get good benefits over at the bureau?
lol dude, read the comment(s) I was responding to - it's what they're suggesting is a solution. i point it out, and you hear ME say it and think I'm an FBI guy?
I'm a recruiter who works in his basement and makes youtube videos as a hobby.
Well hello there Glowy.
see my post history, not every question or opinion you disagree with is immediately an FBI plant. or a bot or anything else.
I ask, simply, which one is easier.
Yes it would be easier because the government couldn't do anything about it. What makes you think we want that liability in the first place? It is a whole hell of a lot easier to just ignore the government in the first place and let them think they own the keys to the castle while we hold down the real fort and defend the real property. China was stupid to think they could infiltrate and control the government. Our government is "We The People..." You can't control us, you stupid faggots. You can eat bullets though.