I don't really think he's missing the point. We just have to acknowledge that those extreme cases exist. XY and XX are still the useful ones that we should classify based on. Like how we say people have two arms and 10 fingers despite variation on that happening via injury, birth defect, etc.
There is XXY or XXX
There's always one of you trying to miss the point with irrelevant fog.
Here's the reality:
"Klinefelter syndrome is a genetic condition in which a boy is born with an extra X chromosome."
"Klinefelter syndrome (KS), also known as 47,XXY is the set of symptoms that result from two or more X chromosomes in males."
Etc.
Males. Females. Even gestational or genetic derangements don't change that.
🤦♂️ 🙈💩
I don't really think he's missing the point. We just have to acknowledge that those extreme cases exist. XY and XX are still the useful ones that we should classify based on. Like how we say people have two arms and 10 fingers despite variation on that happening via injury, birth defect, etc.
Like I think a lot of this argument is pedantic but taking you literally here I actually disagree with your specific comment.
In regards to this specific argument, no we DON’T need to discuss or acknowledge that.
Why? Because the greater context is letting a group of people with a genetic advantage unfairly compete.
If you reduce this to specifics and pedantry all it does is open the door to the left and their slippery slope bullshit.
95% use cases are perfectly acceptable for all of society to function. This is true of many different things.
We don’t need to promote inefficiency by constantly catering to the last 5% on any issue.
That’s how the left always wins. By promoting idiotic test cases.
Did Trumps rightful but rare claims of sedition against the FBI or cheating against state agencies go anywhere?
No. Because the left enforces it’s own 5% rule. But the right bends over every time when theirs is challenged out of “compassion”.
Think about that.