WHO insider raises alarm over Gates and GAVI
March 19, 20211402
OKé people, today you're in for a real treat. We have presented many of the pieces before, but this will help put them in the right perspective. That's the phase we're in right now. We have the facts, we just need to understand what they mean and interpret them the right way.
This is a really important article. It catalyzeded my understanding of what the hell is going on. The facts are obvious; the overall response to the global pandemic was made possible by the World Health Organization. Their recommendations were followed by virtually every government on earth, reports Dr. Joseph Mercola.
No one will dispute this fact. the following data point is: who controls the WHO? Some will dispute this, but the evidence is pretty clear and solid. It's Bill Gates, who became the WHO's biggest financier when then-President Trump stopped U.S. support last year.
What does Gates have to gain from controlling the WHO? How about the best investment he's ever made, with many tens of billions of dollars running through his "nonprofit" GAVI Vaccine Alliance? The maniacal suppression and censorship of any cheap natural alternative to Covid-19 now makes perfect sense.
These natural therapies, atomized hydrogen peroxide is the best example, would be a serious competition for the vaccines. If everyone knew that these remedies were readily available, very effective and practically free, who would risk their life for a vaccine? Hardly anyone. It all makes perfect sense.
With that framework, enjoy the information our team has gathered that expands this overall concept. Every day we put together the pieces of the puzzle, and the more pieces we fit together, the faster you will see the bigger picture. More will follow in the very near future.
WHO insider speaks out
In July 2020, four German lawyers set up the German Corona Extra Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss1)2,3 Op.
In the video above (video is slow to pick up, please wait, please, ed.) interview the founding members, led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich,4Astrid Stuckelberger, Ph.D., a WHO insider, on what she discovered about Bill Gates and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance.
Stuckelberger has been deputy director of the Swiss National Aging Program since the 1990s, and chairman of the WHO-funded Geneva International Network on Ageing.
According to her biography,5 'is an internationally recognised expert in the evaluation of scientific research for policy-makers, in particular in the areas of health and innovation evaluation, training in the management of pandemics and emergencies and optimising the health and well-being of individuals and population groups'.
She is also a published author, with a dozen books to her name, as well as more than 180 scientific articles, policy documents and governmental and international reports. Stuckelberger points out that much of the research carried out was and still is highly politicized and was done primarily to support and justify political decisions.
For the past 20 years, since 2000, she has been involved in public health at the WHO, and she has been a member of their ethics committee for research for four years. In 2009, she became involved in the WHO's international health rules.
Stuckelberger points out that the WHO's international health regulations are intended to prepare Member States for a pandemic so that they can not only prevent outbreaks, but also react quickly if there is an outbreak. However, the WHO has actively prevented and undermined this preparation for a pandemic.
The center of corruption
According to Stuckelberger, Switzerland is the center of corruption, especially since it is the headquarters of GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, founded by Bill Gates. In 2009, the GAVI Alliance was recognized as an international institution and granted full blank immunity.6
As Justus Hoffmann, Ph.D., one of the German members of the Corona Extra Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry, explains, GAVI has "qualified diplomatic immunity", which is strange, since the organization has no political power that would justify diplomatic immunity. What is even stranger is that GAVI's immunity clauses go even further than those of diplomats. GAVI's immunity covers all aspects of engagement, including criminal business transactions.
GAVI is a nongovernmental organization that is allowed to operate without paying taxes, while also enjoying full immunity from everything it does wrong.
"They can do whatever they want,"Stuckelberger says, without repercussions. For example, the police are not allowed to investigate or gather evidence if GAVI were to become involved in a criminal investigation. "It's shocking,"she says. GAVI is also completely exempt from taxes, which Stuckelberger finds "very strange."
In essence, GAVI is a non-governmental organisation (NGO) that is allowed to operate without paying taxes, while also enjoying full immunity from everything it does wrong, intentionally or otherwise. This is fairly unheard of, and raises a whole series of questions. It is particularly troubling in light of the evidence stuckelberger claims to have found, which shows that GAVI "drives the WHO as a business entity."
Moreover, documents cited by Stuckelberger show that the WHO has acquired a kind of dictatorial power around the world. The Director-General has the exclusive power to take decisions – including decisions on which tests or pandemic medicines should be used – which all Member States must then obey.
Gates nation state
Moreover, Stuckelberger discovered that gates actually asked in 2017 to be part of the day-to-day management of the WHO – as a Member State – ostensibly because he gives them so much money. Indeed, its funding exceeds that of many individual Member States.
As Stuckelberger says, this is truly incredible – the idea that one man would have the same power and influence over the WHO as that of an entire nation. It is, to say the least, a brutal power grab. While there is no evidence that Gates has ever officially been granted state status, one may wonder if he does not have it unofficially.
One thing that arouses Stuckelberger's suspicion is the fact that Swissmedic, the Food and Drug Administration of Switzerland, has entered into a three-sided contract agreement with Gates and the WHO. "That's abnormal,"she says.
In summary, when Gates was not voted in as a one-man nation, Gates signed a three-party contract with the Member States and the WHO, essentially aligning him with the WTO. As mentioned earlier, what the Director-General of the WHO also says applies. They have effectively turned world health care into a dictatorship.
The question is, is Gates the real power behind the curtain? Does he tell the Director-General what to do? Looking back on the past year, it seems that Gates has often been the first to announce what the world needs to do to tackle the pandemic, after which the WHO comes up with an identical message, which is then more or less literally taken over by world leaders.
As Fuellmich points out, it becomes clear that many public-private partnerships have been hijacked by the private sector – and they are exempt from liability. "This has to stop,"he says.
A full review and revision of the United Nations, which the WTO has set up, is also necessary, because the UN has done nothing to prevent or contain undemocratic and illegal activities. As Fuellmich notes, we probably need to rethink whether we need them.
Altered definition of pandemic allows for health dictatorship
The interview also highlights the WHO's role in setting up a global health dictatorship by changing the definition of "pandemic." The who's original definition of a pandemic before 2009 was:7,8
"... when a new flu virus emerges against which the human population is not immune, leading to multiple, simultaneous epidemics worldwide with huge numbers of deaths and the sick".
The most important part of that definition is 'a huge number of dead and sick'. This definition was changed in the month preceding the 2009 Mexican flu pandemic.
The change was simple but substantial: the criteria for severity and high mortality were removed, leaving the definition of a pandemic as "a global epidemic of a disease."9 This change in definition is why COVID-19 became and is still promoted as a pandemic, although it did not cause excessive mortality at any time.10,11,12
We now have enough data that shows that the lethality of COVID-19 is the same as that of seasonal flu.13,14,15,16,17 It can be different in terms of symptoms and complications, but the actual lethality is about the same. Yet we are told that the price we have to pay to protect ourselves and others from this virus is to give up our civil rights and freedoms.
In short, by removing the criteria of a serious disease with high morbidity and using only a geographically dispersed infection as a criterion for a pandemic, the WHO and the technocratic leaders of the world have been able to fool the world's population and reduce our lives and livelihoods.
WHO rewrites science by changing definition of herd immunity
The WHO has also radically changed the definition of "herd immunity". Herd immunity occurs when enough people acquire immunity to an infectious disease, so that it can no longer spread widely in the community. When the number of susceptible people is low enough to prevent epidemic growth, it is said that herd immunity has been achieved.
Before the introduction of vaccines, all herd immunity was achieved through exposure to and recovery of an infectious disease. Eventually, when vaccination became widespread, the concept of herd immunity evolved to include not only the naturally acquired immunity resulting from previous disease, but also the temporary immunity acquired by vaccination that can occur after vaccination.
However, in October 2020, the WHO turned science as we know it upside down by revising this established concept in an Orwellian act that completely removes natural infection from the equation.
As recently as June 2020, the WHO's definition of herd immunity, placed on one of their Covid-19 question-and-answer pages, was in line with the generally accepted concept that has been the norm for infectious diseases for decades. Here's what it originally said:18
“Kudde-immuniteit is de indirecte bescherming tegen een infectieziekte die optreedt wanneer een populatie immuun is, hetzij door vaccinatie of immuniteit ontwikkeld door eerdere infectie”.
De bijgewerkte definitie van kudde-immuniteit, die in oktober 2020 verscheen, luidde als volgt:19
“Kudde-immuniteit”, ook wel “populatie-immuniteit” genoemd, is een concept dat wordt gebruikt voor vaccinatie, waarbij een populatie kan worden beschermd tegen een bepaald virus als een drempel van vaccinatie wordt bereikt. Kudde-immuniteit wordt bereikt door mensen te beschermen tegen een virus, niet door ze eraan bloot te stellen.
Vaccins trainen ons immuunsysteem om eiwitten aan te maken die de ziekte bestrijden, de zogenaamde “antilichamen”, net zoals zou gebeuren wanneer we aan een ziekte worden blootgesteld, maar – en dit is van cruciaal belang – vaccins werken zonder ons ziek te maken.
Gevaccineerde mensen zijn beschermd tegen het krijgen van de ziekte in kwestie en het doorgeven ervan, waardoor eventuele besmettingsketens worden doorbroken. Bij kudde-immuniteit is de overgrote meerderheid van de bevolking gevaccineerd, waardoor de totale hoeveelheid virus die zich in de hele bevolking kan verspreiden, daalt”.
Na publieke – en ongetwijfeld gênante – reacties heeft de WHO haar definitie op 31 december 2020 opnieuw herzien, om opnieuw de vermelding van natuurlijke infectie op te nemen, terwijl nog steeds de nadruk wordt gelegd op door vaccinatie verworven immuniteit. De definitie luidt nu:20
“Kudde-immuniteit”, ook wel ‘populatie-immuniteit’ genoemd, is de indirecte bescherming tegen ee
WHO insider raises alarm over Gates and GAVI March 19, 20211402
OKé people, today you're in for a real treat. We have presented many of the pieces before, but this will help put them in the right perspective. That's the phase we're in right now. We have the facts, we just need to understand what they mean and interpret them the right way. This is a really important article. It catalyzeded my understanding of what the hell is going on. The facts are obvious; the overall response to the global pandemic was made possible by the World Health Organization. Their recommendations were followed by virtually every government on earth, reports Dr. Joseph Mercola.
No one will dispute this fact. the following data point is: who controls the WHO? Some will dispute this, but the evidence is pretty clear and solid. It's Bill Gates, who became the WHO's biggest financier when then-President Trump stopped U.S. support last year.
What does Gates have to gain from controlling the WHO? How about the best investment he's ever made, with many tens of billions of dollars running through his "nonprofit" GAVI Vaccine Alliance? The maniacal suppression and censorship of any cheap natural alternative to Covid-19 now makes perfect sense.
These natural therapies, atomized hydrogen peroxide is the best example, would be a serious competition for the vaccines. If everyone knew that these remedies were readily available, very effective and practically free, who would risk their life for a vaccine? Hardly anyone. It all makes perfect sense.
With that framework, enjoy the information our team has gathered that expands this overall concept. Every day we put together the pieces of the puzzle, and the more pieces we fit together, the faster you will see the bigger picture. More will follow in the very near future.
WHO insider speaks out
In July 2020, four German lawyers set up the German Corona Extra Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss1)2,3 Op.
In the video above (video is slow to pick up, please wait, please, ed.) interview the founding members, led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich,4Astrid Stuckelberger, Ph.D., a WHO insider, on what she discovered about Bill Gates and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance.
Stuckelberger has been deputy director of the Swiss National Aging Program since the 1990s, and chairman of the WHO-funded Geneva International Network on Ageing.
According to her biography,5 'is an internationally recognised expert in the evaluation of scientific research for policy-makers, in particular in the areas of health and innovation evaluation, training in the management of pandemics and emergencies and optimising the health and well-being of individuals and population groups'.
She is also a published author, with a dozen books to her name, as well as more than 180 scientific articles, policy documents and governmental and international reports. Stuckelberger points out that much of the research carried out was and still is highly politicized and was done primarily to support and justify political decisions.
For the past 20 years, since 2000, she has been involved in public health at the WHO, and she has been a member of their ethics committee for research for four years. In 2009, she became involved in the WHO's international health rules.
Stuckelberger points out that the WHO's international health regulations are intended to prepare Member States for a pandemic so that they can not only prevent outbreaks, but also react quickly if there is an outbreak. However, the WHO has actively prevented and undermined this preparation for a pandemic.
The center of corruption
According to Stuckelberger, Switzerland is the center of corruption, especially since it is the headquarters of GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, founded by Bill Gates. In 2009, the GAVI Alliance was recognized as an international institution and granted full blank immunity.6
As Justus Hoffmann, Ph.D., one of the German members of the Corona Extra Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry, explains, GAVI has "qualified diplomatic immunity", which is strange, since the organization has no political power that would justify diplomatic immunity. What is even stranger is that GAVI's immunity clauses go even further than those of diplomats. GAVI's immunity covers all aspects of engagement, including criminal business transactions.
GAVI is a nongovernmental organization that is allowed to operate without paying taxes, while also enjoying full immunity from everything it does wrong. "They can do whatever they want,"Stuckelberger says, without repercussions. For example, the police are not allowed to investigate or gather evidence if GAVI were to become involved in a criminal investigation. "It's shocking,"she says. GAVI is also completely exempt from taxes, which Stuckelberger finds "very strange."
In essence, GAVI is a non-governmental organisation (NGO) that is allowed to operate without paying taxes, while also enjoying full immunity from everything it does wrong, intentionally or otherwise. This is fairly unheard of, and raises a whole series of questions. It is particularly troubling in light of the evidence stuckelberger claims to have found, which shows that GAVI "drives the WHO as a business entity."
Moreover, documents cited by Stuckelberger show that the WHO has acquired a kind of dictatorial power around the world. The Director-General has the exclusive power to take decisions – including decisions on which tests or pandemic medicines should be used – which all Member States must then obey.
Gates nation state
Moreover, Stuckelberger discovered that gates actually asked in 2017 to be part of the day-to-day management of the WHO – as a Member State – ostensibly because he gives them so much money. Indeed, its funding exceeds that of many individual Member States.
As Stuckelberger says, this is truly incredible – the idea that one man would have the same power and influence over the WHO as that of an entire nation. It is, to say the least, a brutal power grab. While there is no evidence that Gates has ever officially been granted state status, one may wonder if he does not have it unofficially.
One thing that arouses Stuckelberger's suspicion is the fact that Swissmedic, the Food and Drug Administration of Switzerland, has entered into a three-sided contract agreement with Gates and the WHO. "That's abnormal,"she says.
In summary, when Gates was not voted in as a one-man nation, Gates signed a three-party contract with the Member States and the WHO, essentially aligning him with the WTO. As mentioned earlier, what the Director-General of the WHO also says applies. They have effectively turned world health care into a dictatorship.
The question is, is Gates the real power behind the curtain? Does he tell the Director-General what to do? Looking back on the past year, it seems that Gates has often been the first to announce what the world needs to do to tackle the pandemic, after which the WHO comes up with an identical message, which is then more or less literally taken over by world leaders.
As Fuellmich points out, it becomes clear that many public-private partnerships have been hijacked by the private sector – and they are exempt from liability. "This has to stop,"he says.
A full review and revision of the United Nations, which the WTO has set up, is also necessary, because the UN has done nothing to prevent or contain undemocratic and illegal activities. As Fuellmich notes, we probably need to rethink whether we need them.
Altered definition of pandemic allows for health dictatorship
The interview also highlights the WHO's role in setting up a global health dictatorship by changing the definition of "pandemic." The who's original definition of a pandemic before 2009 was:7,8
"... when a new flu virus emerges against which the human population is not immune, leading to multiple, simultaneous epidemics worldwide with huge numbers of deaths and the sick".
The most important part of that definition is 'a huge number of dead and sick'. This definition was changed in the month preceding the 2009 Mexican flu pandemic.
The change was simple but substantial: the criteria for severity and high mortality were removed, leaving the definition of a pandemic as "a global epidemic of a disease."9 This change in definition is why COVID-19 became and is still promoted as a pandemic, although it did not cause excessive mortality at any time.10,11,12
We now have enough data that shows that the lethality of COVID-19 is the same as that of seasonal flu.13,14,15,16,17 It can be different in terms of symptoms and complications, but the actual lethality is about the same. Yet we are told that the price we have to pay to protect ourselves and others from this virus is to give up our civil rights and freedoms.
In short, by removing the criteria of a serious disease with high morbidity and using only a geographically dispersed infection as a criterion for a pandemic, the WHO and the technocratic leaders of the world have been able to fool the world's population and reduce our lives and livelihoods.
WHO rewrites science by changing definition of herd immunity
The WHO has also radically changed the definition of "herd immunity". Herd immunity occurs when enough people acquire immunity to an infectious disease, so that it can no longer spread widely in the community. When the number of susceptible people is low enough to prevent epidemic growth, it is said that herd immunity has been achieved.
Before the introduction of vaccines, all herd immunity was achieved through exposure to and recovery of an infectious disease. Eventually, when vaccination became widespread, the concept of herd immunity evolved to include not only the naturally acquired immunity resulting from previous disease, but also the temporary immunity acquired by vaccination that can occur after vaccination.
However, in October 2020, the WHO turned science as we know it upside down by revising this established concept in an Orwellian act that completely removes natural infection from the equation.
As recently as June 2020, the WHO's definition of herd immunity, placed on one of their Covid-19 question-and-answer pages, was in line with the generally accepted concept that has been the norm for infectious diseases for decades. Here's what it originally said:18
“Kudde-immuniteit is de indirecte bescherming tegen een infectieziekte die optreedt wanneer een populatie immuun is, hetzij door vaccinatie of immuniteit ontwikkeld door eerdere infectie”.
De bijgewerkte definitie van kudde-immuniteit, die in oktober 2020 verscheen, luidde als volgt:19
“Kudde-immuniteit”, ook wel “populatie-immuniteit” genoemd, is een concept dat wordt gebruikt voor vaccinatie, waarbij een populatie kan worden beschermd tegen een bepaald virus als een drempel van vaccinatie wordt bereikt. Kudde-immuniteit wordt bereikt door mensen te beschermen tegen een virus, niet door ze eraan bloot te stellen.
Vaccins trainen ons immuunsysteem om eiwitten aan te maken die de ziekte bestrijden, de zogenaamde “antilichamen”, net zoals zou gebeuren wanneer we aan een ziekte worden blootgesteld, maar – en dit is van cruciaal belang – vaccins werken zonder ons ziek te maken.
Gevaccineerde mensen zijn beschermd tegen het krijgen van de ziekte in kwestie en het doorgeven ervan, waardoor eventuele besmettingsketens worden doorbroken. Bij kudde-immuniteit is de overgrote meerderheid van de bevolking gevaccineerd, waardoor de totale hoeveelheid virus die zich in de hele bevolking kan verspreiden, daalt”.
Na publieke – en ongetwijfeld gênante – reacties heeft de WHO haar definitie op 31 december 2020 opnieuw herzien, om opnieuw de vermelding van natuurlijke infectie op te nemen, terwijl nog steeds de nadruk wordt gelegd op door vaccinatie verworven immuniteit. De definitie luidt nu:20
“Kudde-immuniteit”, ook wel ‘populatie-immuniteit’ genoemd, is de indirecte bescherming tegen ee
You can go to article and get it translated in the Q and A portion It is a detailed article.
May it shed light albeit bitter.