"Hey, we tested a goat and some fruit and they came back as COVID-positive according to these WHO testing kits. I'm starting to suspect these test results are false."
I posted the video of this guy testing various objects on camear to another social media site and received comments justifying it, stating that since it wasnt meant to be tested on a goat, a mango, a banana, soda or anything else doesnt prove the test is inaccurate.
the labcoats are just as easily bought as politicians. That grant money for saying what the donor wants works the same or is more effective than political donations for politicians saying what the donor wants.
But people eat mangos, bananas, goat, and drink soda. The test is sensitive and designed to pick up traces. If common things people eat and drink cause positive tests, that's not OK.
I'm pointing out that their own logic is bad. It wasn't meant to be tested on those things, but traces of those things can literally be where they swab because they are things we consume.
"Hey, we tested a goat and some fruit and they came back as COVID-positive according to these WHO testing kits. I'm starting to suspect these test results are false."
"OMG SCIENCE-DENIER! TRUST THE SCIENCE!"
I posted the video of this guy testing various objects on camear to another social media site and received comments justifying it, stating that since it wasnt meant to be tested on a goat, a mango, a banana, soda or anything else doesnt prove the test is inaccurate.
There is no saving these people.
Was this the guy that also swabbed the tire on his truck and sent that in, and inorganic material tested positive for covid.
it wouldnt surprise me at all. There is no science behind these tests.
Evidence that the sensitivity is too high, therefore making the test invalid.
Their idea of science is mindlessly repeating what the talking-head labcoats tell them.
the labcoats are just as easily bought as politicians. That grant money for saying what the donor wants works the same or is more effective than political donations for politicians saying what the donor wants.
Half the time they're totally unqualified goofs like most Public Health quacks.
But people eat mangos, bananas, goat, and drink soda. The test is sensitive and designed to pick up traces. If common things people eat and drink cause positive tests, that's not OK.
what?
I'm pointing out that their own logic is bad. It wasn't meant to be tested on those things, but traces of those things can literally be where they swab because they are things we consume.
Actually there is no saving us because we have to live with and apparently support these people
we dont have to support them.
We support them like the body supports a tumor. Remove the cancerous growth.
"Believe and listen to people of color, bigots... wait not the ones contradicting my slave master!"