474
Comments (19)
sorted by:
11
Czshad2 11 points ago +11 / -0

A small portion of the military would do whatever they are told. The majority would take off their uniforms and go home to help their families. They will have to drone strike the whole country to exterminate the "extremists"

4
PlanetSmasher2112 4 points ago +4 / -0

Shhh!! The truth is frowned upon!

6
BurtMcGirt 6 points ago +6 / -0

That was also before the military was a bunch of gays, women, and trannies. Would be even worse, now.

5
Littlebigfoot 5 points ago +5 / -0

They would see the true power of exponential value

5
Jacque_Strap 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don’t have any black pajamas or one of those straw hats, but I’m ready to die for Jesus first and American ideals next.

Rather die fighting than turn into a full steam potato like fake president.

1
MAD-3R 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd prefer to make them die for their commie ideals.

1
LatitudeofMind 1 point ago +1 / -0

So when

4
Bullet3250 4 points ago +4 / -0

Most in the Military 'took an oath to the Constitution' - Not to Joe Biden or some pink haired Libtard.

3
RememberKosciuszko 3 points ago +5 / -2

Yeah but Vietnamese farmers had, among other things from Soviets and the Chinese, anti-aircraft systems, a jungle to hide in and a transport network in neighboring country

Do you think that current administration and at least a part of higher-ups in military would have any moral qualms with outright civilian slaughter if the proper narrative of "Trumpers = terrorists" would be fed to the sheep?

If civil war comes to be, better pray that military splits in any significant measure, because civilians vs Democrat regime is cause lost before it even starts

5
MaoHadOnly1Testicle 5 points ago +5 / -0

a jungle to hide in

Iraq and Afghanistan didn't have those

and a transport network in neighboring country

Hear me out

Just hear me out bro

We send Trump to Juarez. Trump negotiates deals with cartels for cheap guns and ammo and supplies, plus cuts off dems' supply of children.

2
the-new-style 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, but the US had McNamara's Morons

Due to a lack of men volunteering for combat standards were lowered in order to meet quotas. They recruited those with low test scores who came to be known as ‘McNamara’s Morons’ a group of 357,000 or so men. With ‘mental standards’ now lower, the US now had men to fight in the war.

A total of 5,478 low-IQ men died will in the service, most of them in combat. Their fatality rate was three times as high as that of other GIs. An estimated 20,270 were wounded, and some were permanently disabled (including an estimated 500 amputees).

2
WildStar 2 points ago +2 / -0

True, but will the trannies and pregnant women be any better?

2
Theyreallinonit 2 points ago +2 / -0

What about the goat herding sand people in the middle east, heard they only had holes in mountains and rocks to hide behind yet we are still at war with them.

2
h4yw1r3_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

yes. I do think they would have qualms. they've gotten used to the fact that killing anyone not directly shooting at you will lead to you getting sent to Leavenworth. I was in Afg with a unit that had an open ROE and we were shocked at what they put the conventional troops through.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
Siteless_Vagrant 3 points ago +3 / -0

*sharpens punji sticks

1
QEBL486 1 point ago +1 / -0

The rednecks of Vietnam were fighting for communism... that’s why they won.

0
Trust_But_Verify_All 0 points ago +1 / -1

All the restrictions held us back on day one if we went weapons free on our ROE. Different story. Politicians were running that war don't forget