I'm wondering if it has to do with children being born in straight relationships that prevents them from going hog wild. Is it a unifying force of male, female, and children that creates peaceful societies?
Eh what do I know I'm a single dude who drinks every night. And since I am wholly underwhelmed by the modern woman I'm definitely not doing crazy kinky shit.
Big to small; civic organizations go first, then religion (bigger often but more localized and less unified usually), then communities, then families, then the individual.
Gay men are incredibly promiscuous. They are so promiscuous that epidemiologists were confused by HIV. They initially thought it was transferable through skin contact and handshaking. Now we know it's only transmissible in the blood.
The reason that this is fundamentally against "nature" is because it's a massive source of the spread of STDs. A prehistoric village would be absolutely wrecked with STDs if homosexuality was permitted behaviour. We know this in our bones, hence why we have this primal response. The only way to undo that response is to brainwash the child.
Examining a broader period and different service, Peter Earle echoed this assessment in his Sailors: English Merchant Seamen 1650-1775:
Research by naval historians has...shown that such relations, though not unknown, were rare at sea...The research for this book tends to confirm these findings, just three references to sodomy having been discovered.[8]
. Hannah Snell, who disguised herself as a man and served as a marine for years, shared a beds with at least three men while ashore on a single voyage without detection.[12] Mary Lacy likewise shared beds with men ignorant of her sex.[13] Sharing beds ashore and close proximity afloat gave ample opportunity for the physical mingling of male bodies, but it's worth noting that both Snell and Lacy escaped detection for years despite that proximity.
Have you got anything to back that up, or just Hollywood depictions of Ancient Greece and prisons?
I'm not in the habit of performing mental gymnastics on people's written communication. She has time to write the comment; she has the time to sort out her meaning.
You may be right. I don't care. She wrote Men, highlighting it and dropping the word gay. The meaning is clear - "all men". That's what we go off.
I'm saying that men, married to women, with a societal, religious expectation of monogamy and fidelity, with children and families to lose, are wildly promiscuous.
So in relationships where both parties are male, the screwing around by both partners is multiplied. There's nothing to incentive monogamy.
Not talking about heterosexual men having situational sex with men because there aren't women around, like on all-male Navy vessels*of old. I'm referring to social environments where the population is all gay men. It's like the Playboy Mansion, with horny guys chasing other horny guys. Or swingers. There's little taboo against screwing around in those social spaces, and little respect for fidelity beyond lip service.
You’re spending too much energy and resources on booze instead of making yourself a hydraulic hammer drill and finding more or better women. And if you’re certain your location. Has none worth drilling, get the fuck out it’s not worth staying.
Hell, I have direct evidence of this from today. Some young, white, heterosexual couple was smooching on each other while waiting for their Five Guys.
It was gross as shit, and I had to choose not to look at my wife while my family finished eating. This couple was over her left shoulder.
Why do I share this? Because I’m as Super Straight as it gets and overt public displays of affection are fucking trashy no matter your race, age or sexuality.
Agreed, but gays take it to the next level, though.
I went to a Melissa Etheridge concert about 25 years ago. Holy shit, the lesbian face sucking was insane! I regularly went to lots of other concerts at this venue, you just don't see straight couples acting like that in public even 1/10th as much.
LGBTQAtoZ is obsessed with labelling you as phobic. I'm not sure what they're trying to achieve with gas lighting and mislabelling, but they do it anyway.
I'm not sure what they're trying to achieve with gas lighting and mislabelling
A phobia is an irrational fear, either in nature or in scope.
Being afraid of a picture of a high place is a phobia, being afraid of being up high to the point you cannot function is a phobia, being afraid of falling off when you're on the edge is not.
The implication is that your phobia, not their perversion, is the illness. That's why they prefer '-phobia' rather than an actual term.
I mean. No offense, but thats my response to either same sexed couple kissing and im a woman, with gay/lesbian friends. No judgment. Just makes me feel weird. Idky.
Lesbians do not make sense. They're homosexual women - they're not normal, it's gross, and it's sinful. If you're saying it makes sense because you as a man are attracted to women, than by that logic women would also consider unions of gay men to make sense because they are attracted to men. All homosexual unions are equally disgusting.
The alphabet “community’s” end goal is the normalisation of the abnormal, a societal shift to viewing heterosexuality as perverse, and ultimately acts of sexual degeneracy forced upon heteros in order to “prove no phobia”.
If your killer instincts are not clean and strong, you will hesitate at the moment of truth. You will not kill. You will become dead Marines. And then you will be in a world of shit. Because Marines are not allowed to die without permission!
Your comment reminded me of this quote from Full Metal Jacket
You're probably just not used to it, I live in a rural area and you don't see that shit around here at all. It's like the first time you see someone's intestines outside their body it's pretty damn un-nerving but eventually you recognize it for what it is and things settle down.
Burying the lede with that "first time you see interestines outside the body"...unless you're on a surgical team, or at an FBI body farm training center,, WTF??
As a straight man, who rents a room from a based gay couple, I can say at least for me that's bullshit. I mean I don't want to see him making out, but they give each other a peck all the time and I don't give a shit.
The gay lifestyle is degenerate and deviant. Period. It is supported and promoted by the commies, the democrats, and the evil left.
("Buh ... buh ... but muh Richard Grenell ... !")
I'm wondering if it has to do with children being born in straight relationships that prevents them from going hog wild. Is it a unifying force of male, female, and children that creates peaceful societies?
Eh what do I know I'm a single dude who drinks every night. And since I am wholly underwhelmed by the modern woman I'm definitely not doing crazy kinky shit.
The individual isn't the core unit of society. It's the family.
Which is why it's their primary target
Destroy anything that competes with The State. Family, religion, civic organizations!
Big to small; civic organizations go first, then religion (bigger often but more localized and less unified usually), then communities, then families, then the individual.
you're wrong about that to be fair, the true individuals are the heroes that establish and protect their societies
No I'm not wrong about it. A society without strong families is no society at all.
thanks for your efforts explaining. let me go tell everyone with broken homes they aren't a part of society
Fucking amen
Take a note from GEOTUS, get off the liquor. You'll feel a whole lot better.
Gay men are incredibly promiscuous. They are so promiscuous that epidemiologists were confused by HIV. They initially thought it was transferable through skin contact and handshaking. Now we know it's only transmissible in the blood.
The reason that this is fundamentally against "nature" is because it's a massive source of the spread of STDs. A prehistoric village would be absolutely wrecked with STDs if homosexuality was permitted behaviour. We know this in our bones, hence why we have this primal response. The only way to undo that response is to brainwash the child.
Men are incredibly promiscuous. In an all-male environment, where there's no anchor to monogamy or fidelity, it's off to the races.
That statement runs counter to the findings.
Have you got anything to back that up, or just Hollywood depictions of Ancient Greece and prisons?
Read what he said again. You’re comparing straight guys to homos.
I'm not in the habit of performing mental gymnastics on people's written communication. She has time to write the comment; she has the time to sort out her meaning.
You may be right. I don't care. She wrote Men, highlighting it and dropping the word gay. The meaning is clear - "all men". That's what we go off.
Great post.
Oh those are a bunch of heterosexual males. Now let’s take a look at how homosexual men behave when they get free reign to do what they want:
www.zombietime.com/up_your_alley_2008/
NSFW: www.zombietime.com/up_your_alley_2015/
NSFW: www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=2066
I'm saying that men, married to women, with a societal, religious expectation of monogamy and fidelity, with children and families to lose, are wildly promiscuous.
So in relationships where both parties are male, the screwing around by both partners is multiplied. There's nothing to incentive monogamy.
Not talking about heterosexual men having situational sex with men because there aren't women around, like on all-male Navy vessels*of old. I'm referring to social environments where the population is all gay men. It's like the Playboy Mansion, with horny guys chasing other horny guys. Or swingers. There's little taboo against screwing around in those social spaces, and little respect for fidelity beyond lip service.
It's the responsibilities that families create, having to worry about things beyond yourself and your immediate gratification.
When society is composed of families, the future matters.
You’re spending too much energy and resources on booze instead of making yourself a hydraulic hammer drill and finding more or better women. And if you’re certain your location. Has none worth drilling, get the fuck out it’s not worth staying.
I don’t want to watch anyone make out
Hell, I have direct evidence of this from today. Some young, white, heterosexual couple was smooching on each other while waiting for their Five Guys.
It was gross as shit, and I had to choose not to look at my wife while my family finished eating. This couple was over her left shoulder.
Why do I share this? Because I’m as Super Straight as it gets and overt public displays of affection are fucking trashy no matter your race, age or sexuality.
Agreed, but gays take it to the next level, though.
I went to a Melissa Etheridge concert about 25 years ago. Holy shit, the lesbian face sucking was insane! I regularly went to lots of other concerts at this venue, you just don't see straight couples acting like that in public even 1/10th as much.
Same. I fucking hate PDA regardless of who it is.
Exactly why I watch no modern television programming. It is chock full of masculinity shaming.
This is very true. Especially if tongues are involved. Yuck
Try watching some yuri scenes (would recommend Shoujo Sect), then come back and say that. Only a faggot would be repulsed by 2 cute girls making out.
Guess the word:
Agate?
Bob Sagget?
Faggots.
Bagette?
“Fuckin mAGGOTS” maybe?
MAGA-ots
yep. its not homo-phobia, its homo-disgust
LGBTQAtoZ is obsessed with labelling you as phobic. I'm not sure what they're trying to achieve with gas lighting and mislabelling, but they do it anyway.
A phobia is an irrational fear, either in nature or in scope.
Being afraid of a picture of a high place is a phobia, being afraid of being up high to the point you cannot function is a phobia, being afraid of falling off when you're on the edge is not.
The implication is that your phobia, not their perversion, is the illness. That's why they prefer '-phobia' rather than an actual term.
Correct.
and we have every right to feel disgusted.
I am not homophobic, they don't scare me a bit.
I am homonauseous.
Ditto. (👻)
Same people who are trying to make us eat maggot-meat hamburgers are also pushing the rainbow onto everything.
We're living in the dumbest timeline
cool it with anti_______ remarks
Anti maggot-meat?
Its in our DNA to abhor homosexual acts.
correct
I mean. No offense, but thats my response to either same sexed couple kissing and im a woman, with gay/lesbian friends. No judgment. Just makes me feel weird. Idky.
Super straight rights! Lol
It's called a disgust response
Lesbian makes sense. Women are 100 times more visually appealing... Gay? Makes no sense at all. Plus, even Gay guys can't stand flaming gays.
I may be a minority, but I think lesbian porn is disgusting and boring.
When I see lesbians in real life, I tend to think, "What a waste" especially if one is attractive.
I'm yet to see an attractive lesbian.
Insert "Lesbians - It's Not Like The Porn" meme here.
I know one, but I think she is going to flip back the moment she realizes her biological clock is ticking and she wants babies.
Sure. But it still makes more sense than being gay.
it doesn't, stop being a cooomer
"I can't wait to win this race and grow up to be a Leftist..." --SpeedY
o~~~ o~-~
Lesbians are gay.
Lesbians do not make sense. They're homosexual women - they're not normal, it's gross, and it's sinful. If you're saying it makes sense because you as a man are attracted to women, than by that logic women would also consider unions of gay men to make sense because they are attracted to men. All homosexual unions are equally disgusting.
You could in theory make babies with both women kissing, so it's completely biologically sound
I'm pressing X on that one. Also, gross.
Well, it is pretty gross
Let them do it in private. I don't want to watch anyone suck face in front of me.
dirty dirty maggots !
Faggots.
The alphabet “community’s” end goal is the normalisation of the abnormal, a societal shift to viewing heterosexuality as perverse, and ultimately acts of sexual degeneracy forced upon heteros in order to “prove no phobia”.
We are definitely seeing that last with the trans bullshit.
Everything the left pushes is in direct contrast to the Word of God. Everything.
Maggot? As in, a Male Faggot?
I like it.
I’m not sure I understand the headline. I know I’m supposed to be offended, but it sounds 100% accurate. 🤨🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️
Never thought about that, but it sounds about right.
When some TV show I otherwise like decides to throw that on the screen, I'm out. Immediately. It is a "disgust" reaction, for sure.
Maggot? That's 5/6 homophobic
I didn't realize the M and F keys on the keyboard were so close to each other.
We can't help it. We are born this way!
Or faggots
Article checks out. Also, I can confirm this personally.
Well both are disgusting
Maggots!
exactly what i was looking for
remember son, dying is gay
I'm not allowed to die without explicit written authorization from 3 parties.
Your comment reminded me of this quote from Full Metal Jacket
Can confirm.
natural response to shit.
Yeah that seems about right
Yeah, I pretty much hate it.
If you don't want to stick your dick in maggots, you're a transphobe
And?
The sky is blue, water is wet, and boobies are fun.
LOL I don't mind seeing maggots one bit I have been to r/politics.
100% true, I'd say it's much worse for me though. As much as I try to be tolerant it disgusts me on a visceral level
Well, it's gross. I'd rather look at feces.
eeewey no poop is worse
Truth
check out. its how I feel when I see faggots kiss, genuinely.
Correct.
So?
There's a point to sexuality, and it's not to have two men kiss.
Also: Gayness is basically a genetic defect (if it doesn't increase your chances of passing on your genes to a baby, it's a defect). https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/12/11/scientists-may-have-finally-unlocked-puzzle-of-why-people-are-gay
In fairness, I dont like watching straight people kiss either.
The same as maggots? Ha. Maggots ain't nothing.
Most accurate headline I've seen in a long time
So, same as women's. Shit makes me want to puke.
You, my fren, have a problem. You should see someone about that
You're probably just not used to it, I live in a rural area and you don't see that shit around here at all. It's like the first time you see someone's intestines outside their body it's pretty damn un-nerving but eventually you recognize it for what it is and things settle down.
If maggots are that common you need to wash out your trash can and get stronger garbage bags.
Burying the lede with that "first time you see interestines outside the body"...unless you're on a surgical team, or at an FBI body farm training center,, WTF??
That'd unnerve me more that fly larvae.
I think you mean /superstraight/ men.
As a straight man, who rents a room from a based gay couple, I can say at least for me that's bullshit. I mean I don't want to see him making out, but they give each other a peck all the time and I don't give a shit.
When I was a maggot, I hated eating dead dick, but a maggot has to do what a maggot does.
That's because maggots are super gross
i literally don't care. leave me out it; i'll leave you alone; straight men become marginally more scarce
not seeing the problem here
Accurate.
Chyna declared queerness a mental illness. No news agencies saying a word. Socialism hates queers in their society. Just more useful idgiots.
I miss the days before this site migrated over to Patriots.win. This kind of messaging just makes me sad, but I guess that’s how we keep on losing.