Any article is Fake News when you decide it is? It was a point by point take down of what she tweeted about.
You defending her like you probably did with Barret's appointment to SCOTUS? We warned you people but you SIMPS saw a cute face and a nice rack so you went along with it even though we said she'd betray us at the worst time. Then guess what happened? She did.
Just like Noem is now. She doesn't want to get a better bill with more proper language. She wants to protect certain aspects of those who do the victimization from being part of the change so she can keep those sweet sweet reelection bucks flowing into her coffers. That's it.
Either you believe something's wrong or you don't. If something can become less wrong with the proper application of Money then I no longer trust that person.
News can be fake because of the conclusion drawn from reported events, not just the events themselves.
Noem is a governor, it is her job to best govern all the people in her state, not just the conservative ones. It is the people of South Dakota's job to speak up if she gets it wrong. I encourage that they do.
She has been fighting the left since the pandemic started. That she kept her state open and proved the lockdown did not work destroyed the narrative of the left and likely is why states started opening up again.
Everyone is going to have different opinions on what needs to happen going forward, we are not a group of mindless robots walking lockstep like the left are.
That means when someone (especially someone generally in line with us) does something we disagree with, we debate them, we push back.
We do not attack them personally. We do not have enough allies to cancel everyone we disagree with. That is unbelievably stupid, and people who push that sort of ideology are more likely to destroy our movement than the lefties are.
Go listen to what she said about it in terms of scenarios where the language of the bill could he adversely used to it's purpose before you go on a retard spree
Any article is Fake News when you decide it is? It was a point by point take down of what she tweeted about.
You defending her like you probably did with Barret's appointment to SCOTUS? We warned you people but you SIMPS saw a cute face and a nice rack so you went along with it even though we said she'd betray us at the worst time. Then guess what happened? She did.
Just like Noem is now. She doesn't want to get a better bill with more proper language. She wants to protect certain aspects of those who do the victimization from being part of the change so she can keep those sweet sweet reelection bucks flowing into her coffers. That's it.
Either you believe something's wrong or you don't. If something can become less wrong with the proper application of Money then I no longer trust that person.
News can be fake because of the conclusion drawn from reported events, not just the events themselves.
Noem is a governor, it is her job to best govern all the people in her state, not just the conservative ones. It is the people of South Dakota's job to speak up if she gets it wrong. I encourage that they do.
She has been fighting the left since the pandemic started. That she kept her state open and proved the lockdown did not work destroyed the narrative of the left and likely is why states started opening up again.
Everyone is going to have different opinions on what needs to happen going forward, we are not a group of mindless robots walking lockstep like the left are.
That means when someone (especially someone generally in line with us) does something we disagree with, we debate them, we push back.
We do not attack them personally. We do not have enough allies to cancel everyone we disagree with. That is unbelievably stupid, and people who push that sort of ideology are more likely to destroy our movement than the lefties are.
Go listen to what she said about it in terms of scenarios where the language of the bill could he adversely used to it's purpose before you go on a retard spree