No, she actually understands policy, and has proven that she actually read the bill, and understands policy (and the unintended [or secretly intended] consequences of weasel-words and/or ambiguous language) and thus, rightfully so, sent the bill back. Now media pundits and those w/ special interests are using this to push a false narrative to smear Noem to those who don't understand policy. Read her thread on it, and how/why she did it, and/or read an article that actually has accurate analysis on this - as someone that both researches/works in public policy, and also works in higher-ed, she is 100% right, and the bill needs to be revised in order to successfully deliver the intent/outcomes it's claiming to deliver
No, she actually understands policy, and has proven that she actually read the bill, and understands policy (and the unintended [or secretly intended] consequences of weasel-words and/or ambiguous language) and thus, rightfully so, sent the bill back. Now media pundits and those w/ special interests are using this to push a false narrative to smear Noem to those who don't understand policy. Read her thread on it, and how/why she did it, and/or read an article that actually has accurate analysis on this - as someone that both researches/works in public policy, and also works in higher-ed, she is 100% right, and the bill needs to be revised in order to successfully deliver the intent/outcomes it's claiming to deliver