Comments (6)
sorted by:
4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
1
TexasJack [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Read her proposed changes to the law. They gut its central purpose.

She completely removes prohibitions on trans in college women's sports and allows trans in k-12 by defining "biological sex" as what is on the student athlete's birth certificate or "affidavit provided upon initial enrollment".

In other words, under Noem’s proposed changes, a biological male would easily be able to participate in women’s sports in South Dakota (even in K-12) as long as he files the proper paperwork.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-2
Schiffblower -2 points ago +1 / -3

She also wants it narrowed to K-12 and not ban transgender collegiate sports

I have no problem with college sports allowing trans people in college competition because they are all 18+ and legal adults

1
grognar_the_ape 1 point ago +4 / -3

This site is incredibly compromised. I thought Reddit was a fount of disinformation, but this site has clearly been co-opted. I just don’t believe anything I read here anymore.

0
HueyLongAdmirer 0 points ago +2 / -2

Stop worrying. The SD legislature is OVERWHELMINGLY Republican, and always has been. Far more than any Midwestern state. Ask the people of DFL-dominated Minnesota how they feel.