Go fuck yourself, shill. Trump was up against so many and he always told us to be non-violent, but because some idiots got wrapped up with the infiltrators and doing stupid shit it damned Trump and a lot of tremendous, completely law abiding people. The people up against Trump don't play by the rules and he never was a dictator, he also never had our Military leadership behind him as he never could cross the Rubicon. Trump all the way and the bigger voice he has the better things will be for all of us.
Is he really an absolutist or does he ban certain things that he doesn't like? For instance, his stance on no pornography. Some people may not like it but that's curtailing someone's free speech and expression.
I'm a pragmatist. The reality is that the public at large will not accept any racism in any newly made social media platform. Once the platform is mature and the user base is there, that is when you can incorporate idealism on the platform.
The reason I ask is because you're either an absolutist like the founding fathers or you're someone who will cuck. It's just a matter of finding your cuck line.
Your rationalisation about the general public is bunk. The aim here is political change. You only need 10% of the public to get that.
You are never, ever, ever going to get more than that. In case you haven't noticed, corporate interests (mainly jews) have total control over the mass media, and now social media, as well as the education sector and publishing houses.
When you set your cuck-line as no anti-Semitism (which basically means any criticism or comparison), you eliminate the ONLY conversations that can help the situation.
The public won't accept "racism"? Well, let's test your hypothesis and allow total free speech. . . .
How come all uncensored platforms tilt immediately so-called "alt-right"?
It's not the "public" that's afraid of advocating for their own interests and expressing pride in their own group. It's a small dual citizen demographic.
Don't you EVER slander the American public again by projecting the values of a small, paranoid alien group onto Americans. This tiny group mass-murdered 70 million Russians. The KKK? The Southern Poverty Law Center admits that, in over 150 years, even as repugnant a group as the Klan killed about 8,000 people. Sorry, but "white supremacy" isn't a danger to America. If you want to virtue-signal, let's bust out the body-counts and let the numbers tell us who the evil threat to the West is. So, no, sorry: I'm not superimposing their values over AMERICAN values. I don't bow to mass-murderers. I don't let them set the agenda, and I don't allow them to tell me "what's best for the nation".
No, censorship is what's "best for their power".
Tell you what? Let's meet halfway. Let's agree that, if censorship is to be permitted (as you suggest) we censor one tiny, predatory, human-trafficking, mass-murdering group. Strip them of all media control. Deal?
He is. And a fraud. He only started to pretend to be maga to get his site going. Also it shows by how much he talks shit when someone doesn’t want to use gab, for example an he started attacking Bongino for using Parler instead.
He made an account in his name and uploaded every Trump tweet to it. That's some stalker type stuff.
The downvotes are gab investors begging for Trump to join and boost revenue.
Torbas got a point
Trump should've just joined Gab.
Trump just needs a voice and I'll go there a half dozen times a day AT LEAST.
Go fuck yourself, shill. Trump was up against so many and he always told us to be non-violent, but because some idiots got wrapped up with the infiltrators and doing stupid shit it damned Trump and a lot of tremendous, completely law abiding people. The people up against Trump don't play by the rules and he never was a dictator, he also never had our Military leadership behind him as he never could cross the Rubicon. Trump all the way and the bigger voice he has the better things will be for all of us.
Thanks for nothing Ivanka!
You sure look pretty and would be popular in peace time.
Good thing the GOP rebranded all RINOS as white knights for Ivanka/Jared.
Thanks for not defending your dad as he single handedly performed a mighty heroic deed for all history that can never be taken away.
Wtf?
He did that on The Apprentice, got rid of Carolyn in order to promote Ivanka.
Unfortunate streak of nepotism
מממממ
Nah, Gab gets hacked almost once a month, big time
They really need to step up their game
I'm glad he didn't. Torbas seems like a loose cannon.
Any free speech absolutist can be described like that.
Are you a free speech absolutists, or do you believe certain speech should be curtailed?
Is he really an absolutist or does he ban certain things that he doesn't like? For instance, his stance on no pornography. Some people may not like it but that's curtailing someone's free speech and expression.
Porn isnt speech. Its degeneracy that adds nothing to the conversation and should be banned for the distraction it is.
I'm a pragmatist. The reality is that the public at large will not accept any racism in any newly made social media platform. Once the platform is mature and the user base is there, that is when you can incorporate idealism on the platform.
The reason I ask is because you're either an absolutist like the founding fathers or you're someone who will cuck. It's just a matter of finding your cuck line.
Your rationalisation about the general public is bunk. The aim here is political change. You only need 10% of the public to get that.
You are never, ever, ever going to get more than that. In case you haven't noticed, corporate interests (mainly jews) have total control over the mass media, and now social media, as well as the education sector and publishing houses.
When you set your cuck-line as no anti-Semitism (which basically means any criticism or comparison), you eliminate the ONLY conversations that can help the situation.
I too see it this way. I may be a critic but realistically I say let a thousand strategies bloom, let's see what works and work from there.
The public won't accept "racism"? Well, let's test your hypothesis and allow total free speech. . . .
How come all uncensored platforms tilt immediately so-called "alt-right"?
It's not the "public" that's afraid of advocating for their own interests and expressing pride in their own group. It's a small dual citizen demographic.
Don't you EVER slander the American public again by projecting the values of a small, paranoid alien group onto Americans. This tiny group mass-murdered 70 million Russians. The KKK? The Southern Poverty Law Center admits that, in over 150 years, even as repugnant a group as the Klan killed about 8,000 people. Sorry, but "white supremacy" isn't a danger to America. If you want to virtue-signal, let's bust out the body-counts and let the numbers tell us who the evil threat to the West is. So, no, sorry: I'm not superimposing their values over AMERICAN values. I don't bow to mass-murderers. I don't let them set the agenda, and I don't allow them to tell me "what's best for the nation".
No, censorship is what's "best for their power".
Tell you what? Let's meet halfway. Let's agree that, if censorship is to be permitted (as you suggest) we censor one tiny, predatory, human-trafficking, mass-murdering group. Strip them of all media control. Deal?
He is. And a fraud. He only started to pretend to be maga to get his site going. Also it shows by how much he talks shit when someone doesn’t want to use gab, for example an he started attacking Bongino for using Parler instead.
Bongino was one of the guys running Parler....and frankly it's a shit website.
They hung Torba out to dry for years as fascist businesses tried to unperson him and rob him of his livelihood.
I'd be salty and skeptic af too
So would you.
Don't even dare pretend.
Team Jared brigading us hard tonight.
He invested in many alt tech companies, he never ran or had any involvement in day to day operations.
and look at Parler now.
Show me one example of him not being MAGA or as conservative as he is. I'll wait.
And you have to sign up to be able to read comments. Fuck Gab!
He made an account in his name and uploaded every Trump tweet to it. That's some stalker type stuff. The downvotes are gab investors begging for Trump to join and boost revenue.
How dare he allow the president to speak when Twitter banned him and RINOs tried to have him killed.
How dare he attack the President and his family for no other reason than not joining his shitty racist infested little social media platform?
He thought it’d make Trump want to use his shit site. Womp womp