I wonder what Pelosi and Schumer have up their sleeve for the military troops that are ordered to murder citizens in masse when the civil war breaks out?
Then why the double standards? George Floyd, as one example, O.D.’s on fentanyl while violently resisting arrest and his family gets $27 million dollars? Politicians are creating new legislation to strangle law enforcement, the Supreme Court won’t hear election fraud cases fearing riots, Antifa wants to defund police...where does this shit end? I don’t approve of Babbitt’s actions, but murdering an unarmed woman is not what we stand for. If the cop wants to disclose who ordered him to shoot and kill unarmed citizens, then we can talk about reduced charges. But to praise him? Give me a break. This is Pelosi’s doing.
Police had no way of knowing that she was unarmed. She could have had anything in that backpack, including chemical or biological weapons, and she was actively trying to proceed deeper into secured areas, and closer to the House Chamber, via a broken interior window. The officer who shot her was doing his job well, as was the officer who agreed to George Floyd's demand to get out of the squad car and lie down on the ground, and then took up a position in which he was prepared to immediately stop any attempt by Floyd to get up and run. When people are caught in the act of committing a crime, it is reasonable and appropriate for law enforcement on the scene to interpret all the information they have about the perp through a filter which assumes criminal intent is likely. Makes no difference who the perp is or what the perp claims their intentions are.
Then why the double standards? George Floyd, as one example, O.D.’s on fentanyl while violently resisting arrest and his family gets $27 million dollars? Politicians are creating new legislation to strangle law enforcement, the Supreme Court won’t hear election fraud cases fearing riots, Antifa wants to defund police...where does this shit end? I don’t approve of Babbitt’s actions, but murdering an unarmed woman is not what we stand for. If the cop wants to disclose who ordered him to shoot and kill unarmed citizens, then we can talk about reduced charges. But to praise him? Give me a break. This is Pelosi’s doing.
Police had no way of knowing that she was unarmed. She could have had anything in that backpack, including chemical or biological weapons, and she was actively trying to proceed deeper into secured areas, and closer to the House Chamber, via a broken interior window. The officer who shot her was doing his job well, as was the officer who agreed to George Floyd's demand to get out of the squad car and lie down on the ground, and then took up a position in which he was prepared to immediately stop any attempt by Floyd to get up and run. When people are caught in the act of committing a crime, it is reasonable and appropriate for law enforcement on the scene to interpret all the information they have about the perp through a filter which assumes criminal intent is likely. Makes no difference who the perp is or what the perp claims their intentions are.