This guy it talking absolute nonsense. Half of what he says doesn't make sense or is tin foil hat nonsense.
I'm sorry but if this was the most secure election ever (which is an outrageous claim) what's the problem? Why are you so scared of them if there's nothing to find? If it's an exercise in futility then how can it possibly be "sedition" or impact the result?
If it passed every test then why are you objecting to them running this test?
All this guy does it just keeps screaming sedition. I'm worry but the only thing you can do by blocking recounts is to enable sedition. Those two positions are mutually exclusive.
The only thing checking the ballots can possibly achieve other than nothing is detecting sedition. So how is it sedition if they want to check the ballots? What's the point of gaining possession if you can't even count them? It sounds to me like absolute nonsense. You can have possession of the ballots but oops sorry you're not allowed to look at them?
If this was the most secure election they'd open everything up for the people to look at it and show us just how secure it was.
Instead, the courts and everybody ignore every attempt to look at what happened, which is exactly what you do when you're are covering something up.
The most secure election would be the most secure election because of the transparency that election has. This one had 0 transparency. therefore, not the most secure election.
This guy it talking absolute nonsense. Half of what he says doesn't make sense or is tin foil hat nonsense.
I'm sorry but if this was the most secure election ever (which is an outrageous claim) what's the problem? Why are you so scared of them if there's nothing to find? If it's an exercise in futility then how can it possibly be "sedition" or impact the result?
If it passed every test then why are you objecting to them running this test?
All this guy does it just keeps screaming sedition. I'm worry but the only thing you can do by blocking recounts is to enable sedition. Those two positions are mutually exclusive.
The only thing checking the ballots can possibly achieve other than nothing is detecting sedition. So how is it sedition if they want to check the ballots? What's the point of gaining possession if you can't even count them? It sounds to me like absolute nonsense. You can have possession of the ballots but oops sorry you're not allowed to look at them?
If this was the most secure election they'd open everything up for the people to look at it and show us just how secure it was.
Instead, the courts and everybody ignore every attempt to look at what happened, which is exactly what you do when you're are covering something up.
The most secure election would be the most secure election because of the transparency that election has. This one had 0 transparency. therefore, not the most secure election.