That we are being lied to by those who are supposed to protect us is scary, but should be sobering. Who lies to you in the effort to help?
And yet I do think most in the healthcare chain do try to actually help. You don't go to that much school to be a monster. (Usually) I would think that includes people working to develop the vaccine. Although of course corporate interests also become involved.
If the jab actually prevents infection, that would be WONDERFUL! I have seen many statements from public health authorities plainly stating it does NOT. Is that purely political, and defies the science?
I have seen it stated that the severe form of the disease can be avoided via the jab, even though it doesn't prevent infection. Maybe I shouldn't take that at face value? This is what Dr Z's protocol does. Start taking that immediately upon diagnosis and the disease won't progress. If it has progressed already, it'll turn around in 2 days such that breathing problems are GONE. If it's progressed too far before you start the medication, it either won't help at all or it won't help enough. (No practical difference)
The false notion of asymptomatic spread could become a reality IF it is true that the jab doesn't prevent infection but does prevent or reduce symptoms. I forget the name of the disease that plagues our chicken population that does exactly this. This could become an apocalyptic scenario. Hopefully this is all false.
If the mRNA is shortlived and has no long-term consequence, this may be safe. In which case it might be needed every year or every 90 days otherwise it's no longer effective. Which brings the long-term effects back into the discussion.
And therein lies the rub. They aren't lying to you in some misguided attempt to protect you. They are lying to you to keep the ruse going. They have not yet extracted maximal political benefit that this virus provides them. The masks aren't there to keep you safe, they are there to keep you afraid (read:compliant). And it works so damn well, that they were able to pull off the biggest election heist in world history. So why stop now. The vaccine is great and all, and it will probably keep the virus under control. Whether it's necessary is something that every individual should have to right to decide for themselves. But the weapon that this virus truly is is way too valuable to give up so soon. Everyone who tells you that the vaccine doesn't prevent spread is one of 2 things: an idiot, or a politician. Just my humble opinion. The flu vaccine prevents spread (nobody has ever claimed otherwise), but the covid vaccine does not? The virus spreads on exactly the same way, respiratory droplets, and is about as deadly in roughly the same populations. Used to be more deadly, but we have better drugs, including the protocol you mentioned.
Thank you!
That we are being lied to by those who are supposed to protect us is scary, but should be sobering. Who lies to you in the effort to help?
And yet I do think most in the healthcare chain do try to actually help. You don't go to that much school to be a monster. (Usually) I would think that includes people working to develop the vaccine. Although of course corporate interests also become involved.
If the jab actually prevents infection, that would be WONDERFUL! I have seen many statements from public health authorities plainly stating it does NOT. Is that purely political, and defies the science?
I have seen it stated that the severe form of the disease can be avoided via the jab, even though it doesn't prevent infection. Maybe I shouldn't take that at face value? This is what Dr Z's protocol does. Start taking that immediately upon diagnosis and the disease won't progress. If it has progressed already, it'll turn around in 2 days such that breathing problems are GONE. If it's progressed too far before you start the medication, it either won't help at all or it won't help enough. (No practical difference)
The false notion of asymptomatic spread could become a reality IF it is true that the jab doesn't prevent infection but does prevent or reduce symptoms. I forget the name of the disease that plagues our chicken population that does exactly this. This could become an apocalyptic scenario. Hopefully this is all false.
If the mRNA is shortlived and has no long-term consequence, this may be safe. In which case it might be needed every year or every 90 days otherwise it's no longer effective. Which brings the long-term effects back into the discussion.
Lots of unknowns and thus confusion!
And therein lies the rub. They aren't lying to you in some misguided attempt to protect you. They are lying to you to keep the ruse going. They have not yet extracted maximal political benefit that this virus provides them. The masks aren't there to keep you safe, they are there to keep you afraid (read:compliant). And it works so damn well, that they were able to pull off the biggest election heist in world history. So why stop now. The vaccine is great and all, and it will probably keep the virus under control. Whether it's necessary is something that every individual should have to right to decide for themselves. But the weapon that this virus truly is is way too valuable to give up so soon. Everyone who tells you that the vaccine doesn't prevent spread is one of 2 things: an idiot, or a politician. Just my humble opinion. The flu vaccine prevents spread (nobody has ever claimed otherwise), but the covid vaccine does not? The virus spreads on exactly the same way, respiratory droplets, and is about as deadly in roughly the same populations. Used to be more deadly, but we have better drugs, including the protocol you mentioned.