Didn't shill for her, but that is just legal speak for it was an opinion and not subject to defamation, Rachel Maddow did the same thing when she was sued
Nope. It is akin to proposing a hypothesis before an experiment, and seeing if the experiment will support the hypothesis. In this case, Sidney proposed a hypothesis, but the courts never gave her a chance to test it.
Didn't shill for her, but that is just legal speak for it was an opinion and not subject to defamation, Rachel Maddow did the same thing when she was sued
Tucker Carlson also did the same thing and won his case.
that’s just legal speak for “I lied”
Same with Maddow
Same with Alex Jones
Nope. It is akin to proposing a hypothesis before an experiment, and seeing if the experiment will support the hypothesis. In this case, Sidney proposed a hypothesis, but the courts never gave her a chance to test it.
Yep. Sounds like laywer-speak.
C O P E
P R O J E C T I O N