“Such characterizations of the allegedly defamatory statements further support defendants’ position that reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process.”
This means she expected to prove this in court but also expected they would not be accepted as fact until the process was complete. Which is exactly how the law works every single time.
3rd, lawyers go with the path of least resistance. It is easier to dismiss the suit than to prove the fraud.
This particular response should have been expected. It's not evidence of a grift.
Tucker Carlson and Maddow used this defense and won.
Ahem...
The ultimate defense to slander, libel, and defamation is the truth.
If in fact Powell had one single shred of factual evidence that was ignored in the original suits, being sued by Dominion is her perfectly legitimate chance to show it, to prove it, to provide the actual truth.
Assuming it exists at all, this is her chance, this is Giuliani's chance too.
To prove it, once and for all.
Instead of showing the evidence they claimed they had, instead of using the primary defense to these types of law suits, what to they do?
They throw Pedes under the bus.
This was all a grift.
If they had proof, if they had a defense, they would JUMP at the chance to show it.
And worse, rather than see it for the grift it was, Pedes willingly ignore common legal sense.
IF SHE HAD PROOF, IF SHE EVER HAD PROOF, THAT PROOF WOULD BE THE IDEAL DEFENSE!
And the media would have given it exactly how much coverage to get the news out ... Also, any information she released would be fodder for denial and nitpicking by the media and the complainants... Most of all, seeking dismissal is the set in stone first step of any trial strategy .... that PROOF you speak of will come out in the trial as it should. We don't try cases in the media ... though reading your post, maybe we do.
Furthermore, she put and backed up all the information she claimed, including, as you know because you happen to be the king of 'deep-thinking,' signed affidavits. So, the fact that she is claiming no reasonable person would believe Dominion was involved in voter fraud is actually true; they only create the system. How it's used is entirely different. It's like blaming Colt or Sig for shootings, or Ford for a car accident that it out of the realm liability. Keep trying though, you'll get there some day
No, actually it wasn't. It was that the machines "flipped" votes. It's only come out after that they're using a weighted race feature. More proof has come out to support her claims than not. Sorry, but you're wrong. Keep trying though
Well if it is too outrageous to believe and no logical person would ever believe it then a judge will dismiss and she can go on to tell those of us complete morons who saw the fraud happen before our eyes it happened. If they want to prove defamation they have to prove that it is completely believable that dominion software/machines could be used to steal elections and provide discovery. I think it’s pretty slick. We shall see though. If you read her books, she is pretty brilliant.
“Such characterizations of the allegedly defamatory statements further support defendants’ position that reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process.”
This means she expected to prove this in court but also expected they would not be accepted as fact until the process was complete. Which is exactly how the law works every single time.
3rd, lawyers go with the path of least resistance. It is easier to dismiss the suit than to prove the fraud.
This particular response should have been expected. It's not evidence of a grift. Tucker Carlson and Maddow used this defense and won.
Ahem... The ultimate defense to slander, libel, and defamation is the truth. If in fact Powell had one single shred of factual evidence that was ignored in the original suits, being sued by Dominion is her perfectly legitimate chance to show it, to prove it, to provide the actual truth. Assuming it exists at all, this is her chance, this is Giuliani's chance too. To prove it, once and for all.
Instead of showing the evidence they claimed they had, instead of using the primary defense to these types of law suits, what to they do? They throw Pedes under the bus.
This was all a grift. If they had proof, if they had a defense, they would JUMP at the chance to show it. And worse, rather than see it for the grift it was, Pedes willingly ignore common legal sense. IF SHE HAD PROOF, IF SHE EVER HAD PROOF, THAT PROOF WOULD BE THE IDEAL DEFENSE!
And the media would have given it exactly how much coverage to get the news out ... Also, any information she released would be fodder for denial and nitpicking by the media and the complainants... Most of all, seeking dismissal is the set in stone first step of any trial strategy .... that PROOF you speak of will come out in the trial as it should. We don't try cases in the media ... though reading your post, maybe we do.
They were defamation cases, don't get your point. I don't watch either, used to watch Carlson.
It's called making a defense. Smart.
You brought up chess, not me.
Furthermore, she put and backed up all the information she claimed, including, as you know because you happen to be the king of 'deep-thinking,' signed affidavits. So, the fact that she is claiming no reasonable person would believe Dominion was involved in voter fraud is actually true; they only create the system. How it's used is entirely different. It's like blaming Colt or Sig for shootings, or Ford for a car accident that it out of the realm liability. Keep trying though, you'll get there some day
No, actually it wasn't. It was that the machines "flipped" votes. It's only come out after that they're using a weighted race feature. More proof has come out to support her claims than not. Sorry, but you're wrong. Keep trying though
No I said dominion wasn’t involved. They only made the machine. Learn to read genius
Powell had nothing to do with Q.
I am Jacks lack of surprise.
I am Jacks lack of surprise.
Well if it is too outrageous to believe and no logical person would ever believe it then a judge will dismiss and she can go on to tell those of us complete morons who saw the fraud happen before our eyes it happened. If they want to prove defamation they have to prove that it is completely believable that dominion software/machines could be used to steal elections and provide discovery. I think it’s pretty slick. We shall see though. If you read her books, she is pretty brilliant.
Boilerplate.